Evidence for the Induction of Analgesic Cross-Tolerance Between Opioid and Apelin/APJ Systems in Male Rats.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.15288/jsad.23-00377
Elham Abbasloo, Saeed Esmaeili-Mahani, Firas Kobeissy, Theresa Currier Thomas
{"title":"Evidence for the Induction of Analgesic Cross-Tolerance Between Opioid and Apelin/APJ Systems in Male Rats.","authors":"Elham Abbasloo, Saeed Esmaeili-Mahani, Firas Kobeissy, Theresa Currier Thomas","doi":"10.15288/jsad.23-00377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Opioids are potent pain relievers for managing severe pain. However, their effectiveness is hindered by tolerance, which causes the need for higher doses and leads to adverse effects. In a previous study, we found that prolonged use of apelin, similar to opioids, results in a tolerance to its analgesic effects. It remains unclear whether there is a cross-tolerance between morphine and apelin, meaning if the analgesic effects of one can reduce the effectiveness of the other.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold. All experiments were carried out on 63 male Wistar rats, which received intrathecal apelin (3 μg/rat) or morphine (15 μg/rat) for 7 days. To determine cross-tolerance between the analgesic effect of morphine and apelin, the analgesic property of apelin or morphine was assessed in chronic morphine- or apelin-treated groups, respectively. To determine the role of apelin and opioid receptors signaling on the development of analgesic cross-tolerance, F13-A and naloxone, as apelin and opioid receptor antagonists, were injected simultaneously with morphine or apelin. At the end of the tests, the expression levels of apelin and μ-opioid receptors were evaluated by western blotting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data indicated that chronic apelin or morphine use produced tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of each other. F13-A and naloxone could inhibit the induction of such cross-tolerance. The molecular data showed that there was a significant downregulation of apelin receptors in chronic morphine-treated rats and vice versa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic administration of apelin or morphine induces analgesic cross-tolerance that may, in part, be mediated through receptor interactions and downregulation. The demonstrated efficacy of F13-A in these experiments highlights its potential as a novel target for improving pain management through the inhibition of the apelin/APJ signaling pathway, meriting further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":"704-712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Opioids are potent pain relievers for managing severe pain. However, their effectiveness is hindered by tolerance, which causes the need for higher doses and leads to adverse effects. In a previous study, we found that prolonged use of apelin, similar to opioids, results in a tolerance to its analgesic effects. It remains unclear whether there is a cross-tolerance between morphine and apelin, meaning if the analgesic effects of one can reduce the effectiveness of the other.

Method: The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold. All experiments were carried out on 63 male Wistar rats, which received intrathecal apelin (3 μg/rat) or morphine (15 μg/rat) for 7 days. To determine cross-tolerance between the analgesic effect of morphine and apelin, the analgesic property of apelin or morphine was assessed in chronic morphine- or apelin-treated groups, respectively. To determine the role of apelin and opioid receptors signaling on the development of analgesic cross-tolerance, F13-A and naloxone, as apelin and opioid receptor antagonists, were injected simultaneously with morphine or apelin. At the end of the tests, the expression levels of apelin and μ-opioid receptors were evaluated by western blotting.

Results: The data indicated that chronic apelin or morphine use produced tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of each other. F13-A and naloxone could inhibit the induction of such cross-tolerance. The molecular data showed that there was a significant downregulation of apelin receptors in chronic morphine-treated rats and vice versa.

Conclusions: Chronic administration of apelin or morphine induces analgesic cross-tolerance that may, in part, be mediated through receptor interactions and downregulation. The demonstrated efficacy of F13-A in these experiments highlights its potential as a novel target for improving pain management through the inhibition of the apelin/APJ signaling pathway, meriting further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在雄性大鼠体内诱导阿片类和凋亡素/APJ 系统之间的镇痛交叉耐受的证据。
背景介绍阿片类药物是治疗严重疼痛的强效止痛药。然而,阿片类药物的疗效会受到耐受性的影响,耐受性会使患者需要服用更大剂量的阿片类药物,并导致不良反应。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现长期使用杏仁蛋白与阿片类药物类似,会对其镇痛效果产生耐受性。目前还不清楚吗啡和阿片类药物之间是否存在交叉耐受性,即其中一种药物的镇痛效果是否会降低另一种药物的镇痛效果:方法:使用挠尾试验来评估痛觉阈值。所有实验均在 63 只雄性 Wistar 大鼠身上进行,这些大鼠接受了为期 7 天的鞘内阿佩林(3µg/只)或吗啡(15µg/只)注射。为了确定吗啡和阿佩林镇痛作用之间的交叉耐受性,分别在长期接受吗啡或阿佩林治疗的组别中评估了阿佩林或吗啡的镇痛特性。为了确定阿佩林和阿片受体信号转导对镇痛交叉耐受的产生所起的作用,在注射吗啡或阿佩林的同时注射了作为阿佩林和阿片受体拮抗剂的F13-A和纳洛酮。试验结束后,用 Western 印迹法评估了阿佩林和μ阿片受体的表达水平:数据表明,长期使用阿佩林或吗啡会对彼此的抗痛作用产生耐受性。F13-A和纳洛酮可以抑制这种交叉耐受的诱导。分子数据显示,长期服用吗啡的大鼠体内芹菜素受体明显下调,反之亦然:结论:长期服用阿佩林或吗啡会诱发镇痛交叉耐受,部分原因可能是受体相互作用和下调。F13-A在这些实验中的疗效凸显了其作为通过抑制凋亡素/APJ信号通路改善疼痛管理的新靶点的潜力,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors for Consensual and Coercive Sexual Hookup Behaviors among College Men: A Daily Diary Study. Harms from others' drinking and key indicators of the college experience in the United States. Interactive Effects of Anger and Alcohol Intoxication on Men's Laboratory-Based Sexual Aggression Propensity Following a Masculinity Threat. Measurement equivalence of the Marijuana Effect Expectancies Questionnaire-Brief across sex, race/ethnicity, and their co-occurring social identities for Black, Latinx, and non-Latinx white youth in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Cannabis and alcohol enforcement strategies across the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1