Development and Initial Validation of the Shame Frequency Questionnaire in Medical Students.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005713
William E Bynum, Ting Dong, Sebastian Uijtdehaage, Franz Belz, Anthony R Artino
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Shame Frequency Questionnaire in Medical Students.","authors":"William E Bynum, Ting Dong, Sebastian Uijtdehaage, Franz Belz, Anthony R Artino","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study presents the steps taken to develop and collect initial validity evidence for the Shame Frequency Questionnaire in Medical Students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The instrument was based on a 7-step survey design; validity evidence was collected from content, response process, internal structure, and relationship to other variables. A literature review and qualitative interviews led to the design of the initial 16-item scale. Expert review and cognitive interviewing led to minor modifications in the original structure. Initial pilot testing was conducted in August 2019 in Uniformed Services University (USU) medical students; reliability assessment and exploratory factor analysis were performed. The revised 12-item scale was tested in January 2022 in Duke University School of Medicine medical students; reliability assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and correlation analysis with depression, burnout, anxiety, emotional thriving, and emotional well-being were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 336 of 678 USU students (50%) and 106 of 522 Duke students (20%) completed the survey. Initial exploratory factor analysis of the USU data revealed 1 factor (shame), and 4 items were dropped from the scale according to predefined rules. Subsequent exploratory factor analysis of the Duke data revealed 1 factor; no further items were removed according to predefined rules. Internal consistent reliability was 0.95, and all interitem correlations were less than 0.85 for USU and Duke samples. As predicted, mean shame scale scores were positively correlated with anxiety ( r = 0.54, P < .001), burnout ( r = 0.50, P < .001), and depression ( r = 0.47, P < .001) and negatively correlated with emotional thriving ( r = -0.46, P < .001) and emotional recovery ( r = -0.46, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Shame Frequency Questionnaire in Medical Students is a psychometrically sound instrument with strong internal reliability and multisource validity evidence, supporting its use in studying shame in medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents the steps taken to develop and collect initial validity evidence for the Shame Frequency Questionnaire in Medical Students.

Method: The instrument was based on a 7-step survey design; validity evidence was collected from content, response process, internal structure, and relationship to other variables. A literature review and qualitative interviews led to the design of the initial 16-item scale. Expert review and cognitive interviewing led to minor modifications in the original structure. Initial pilot testing was conducted in August 2019 in Uniformed Services University (USU) medical students; reliability assessment and exploratory factor analysis were performed. The revised 12-item scale was tested in January 2022 in Duke University School of Medicine medical students; reliability assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and correlation analysis with depression, burnout, anxiety, emotional thriving, and emotional well-being were performed.

Results: A total of 336 of 678 USU students (50%) and 106 of 522 Duke students (20%) completed the survey. Initial exploratory factor analysis of the USU data revealed 1 factor (shame), and 4 items were dropped from the scale according to predefined rules. Subsequent exploratory factor analysis of the Duke data revealed 1 factor; no further items were removed according to predefined rules. Internal consistent reliability was 0.95, and all interitem correlations were less than 0.85 for USU and Duke samples. As predicted, mean shame scale scores were positively correlated with anxiety ( r = 0.54, P < .001), burnout ( r = 0.50, P < .001), and depression ( r = 0.47, P < .001) and negatively correlated with emotional thriving ( r = -0.46, P < .001) and emotional recovery ( r = -0.46, P < .001).

Conclusions: The Shame Frequency Questionnaire in Medical Students is a psychometrically sound instrument with strong internal reliability and multisource validity evidence, supporting its use in studying shame in medical students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生羞耻频率问卷的开发和初步验证。
目的:本研究介绍了为医学生羞耻频率问卷开发和收集初步有效性证据所采取的步骤:方法:该问卷基于七步调查设计;从内容、回答过程、内部结构以及与其他变量的关系等方面收集效度证据。通过文献回顾和定性访谈,设计了最初的 16 个项目量表。专家评审和认知访谈对原始结构进行了细微修改。2019年8月,在统一服务大学(USU)的医学生中进行了初步试点测试;进行了信度评估和探索性因子分析。2022 年 1 月,在杜克大学医学院医学生中对修订后的 12 个项目量表进行了测试;进行了信度评估、探索性因子分析以及与抑郁、职业倦怠、焦虑、情绪亢奋和情绪幸福感的相关分析:美国南加州大学 678 名学生中有 336 人(50%)完成了调查,杜克大学 522 名学生中有 106 人(20%)完成了调查。对南加州大学的数据进行初步探索性因子分析后发现了一个因子(羞愧),并根据预先设定的规则从量表中删除了 4 个项目。随后对杜克大学的数据进行的探索性因子分析发现了 1 个因子;根据预先设定的规则,没有再删除任何项目。南加大和杜克大学样本的内部一致性信度为 0.95,所有项目间相关性均小于 0.85。正如预测的那样,羞耻感量表的平均得分与焦虑(r = 0.54,P < .001)、职业倦怠(r = 0.50,P < .001)和抑郁(r = 0.47,P < .001)呈正相关,与情感愉悦(r = -0.46,P < .001)和情感恢复(r = -0.46,P < .001)呈负相关:医学生羞耻感频率问卷是一种心理测量工具,具有很强的内部信度和多源效度,可用于研究医学生的羞耻感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
U.S. Medical School Graduates' Placement in Graduate Medical Education: A National Study. Holistic Review in Applicant Selection: A Scoping Review. Sense of Belonging Among Medical Students, Residents, and Fellows: Associations With Burnout, Recruitment Retention, and Learning Environment. A Dedicated Graduate Certificate in Health Equity: A Novel Approach to Increase the Future Physician Capacity to Address Health Inequities. Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1