Prophylactic antiseizure medications for recurrent status epilepticus in nonsyndromic childhood epilepsy

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain & Development Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.braindev.2024.03.004
Hirokazu Takeuchi , Norimichi Higurashi , Yurika Toga
{"title":"Prophylactic antiseizure medications for recurrent status epilepticus in nonsyndromic childhood epilepsy","authors":"Hirokazu Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Norimichi Higurashi ,&nbsp;Yurika Toga","doi":"10.1016/j.braindev.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The management of status epilepticus (SE) has mainly focused on the termination of ongoing SE episodes. However, long-term therapeutic strategies for the prevention of SE are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) for SEs in nonsyndromic childhood epilepsy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study was conducted at Jikei University Hospital. Patients &lt;18 years of age, diagnosed with epilepsy, and experiencing three or more SE episodes within 1 year between April 1, 2017, and October 1, 2021, were included. ASMs introduced for seizure types that developed into SE were evaluated. The effectiveness of ASMs was determined by using the “Rule of Three”: An ASM was determined effective if patients were free of SE for a duration at least three times that of their longest SE interval in 12 months prior to intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The investigation included a total of 32 ASMs administered to 13 patients. The longest interval between SE episodes before ASM administration was 28–257 d. The first SE interval after ASM administration was 12–797 d. Levetiracetam (LEV) and clobazam (CLB) showed effectiveness in 2/10 and 5/6 patients, respectively. Other ASMs were ineffective. The leading etiology of epilepsy was perinatal brain injury, identified in four patients, and CLB was effective in all of them.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present study suggests that CLB and LEV may prolong the SE interval in some cases of nonsyndromic childhood epilepsy. CLB may be beneficial, particularly in patients with perinatal brain injury.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56137,"journal":{"name":"Brain & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0387760424000433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The management of status epilepticus (SE) has mainly focused on the termination of ongoing SE episodes. However, long-term therapeutic strategies for the prevention of SE are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) for SEs in nonsyndromic childhood epilepsy.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at Jikei University Hospital. Patients <18 years of age, diagnosed with epilepsy, and experiencing three or more SE episodes within 1 year between April 1, 2017, and October 1, 2021, were included. ASMs introduced for seizure types that developed into SE were evaluated. The effectiveness of ASMs was determined by using the “Rule of Three”: An ASM was determined effective if patients were free of SE for a duration at least three times that of their longest SE interval in 12 months prior to intervention.

Results

The investigation included a total of 32 ASMs administered to 13 patients. The longest interval between SE episodes before ASM administration was 28–257 d. The first SE interval after ASM administration was 12–797 d. Levetiracetam (LEV) and clobazam (CLB) showed effectiveness in 2/10 and 5/6 patients, respectively. Other ASMs were ineffective. The leading etiology of epilepsy was perinatal brain injury, identified in four patients, and CLB was effective in all of them.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that CLB and LEV may prolong the SE interval in some cases of nonsyndromic childhood epilepsy. CLB may be beneficial, particularly in patients with perinatal brain injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性抗癫痫药物治疗非综合征儿童癫痫的复发性癫痫状态。
目的:癫痫状态(SE)的治疗主要集中于终止正在进行的 SE 发作。然而,目前还缺乏预防 SE 的长期治疗策略。本研究旨在探讨预防性抗癫痫药物(ASMs)对非综合征儿童癫痫的有效性:这项回顾性研究在慈惠大学医院进行。患者结果:研究共对 13 名患者使用了 32 种 ASM。左乙拉西坦(LEV)和氯巴紮(CLB)分别对2/10和5/6的患者有效。其他 ASM 无效。四名患者的主要癫痫病因是围产期脑损伤,CLB对所有患者均有效:本研究表明,CLB 和 LEV 可延长某些非综合征儿童癫痫患者的 SE 间期。CLB可能有益,尤其是对围产期脑损伤患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & Development
Brain & Development 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Brain and Development (ISSN 0387-7604) is the Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Child Neurology, and is aimed to promote clinical child neurology and developmental neuroscience. The journal is devoted to publishing Review Articles, Full Length Original Papers, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor in the field of Child Neurology and related sciences. Proceedings of meetings, and professional announcements will be published at the Editor''s discretion. Letters concerning articles published in Brain and Development and other relevant issues are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
A retrospective study on post-operative recovery of daily living activity after total corpus callosotomy. Looks can be deceiving: An appraisal of Sturge weber syndrome type III case series. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated cerebral cortical encephalitis with super-refractory status epilepticus. Editorial Board Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1