Comparative study of oncology patients' quality of life.

Silmara Meneguin, Camila Fernandes Pollo, Heloiza Thaís Felipe Camargo, Heitor Marques Honório, César de Oliveira
{"title":"Comparative study of oncology patients' quality of life.","authors":"Silmara Meneguin, Camila Fernandes Pollo, Heloiza Thaís Felipe Camargo, Heitor Marques Honório, César de Oliveira","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.3.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A cancer diagnosis has a significant impact on a person's life, both physically and emotionally. However, the oncology patients' QoL (QoL) at different stages of the disease has been under investigated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess and compare the QoL in three groups of oncology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative study was carried out in an outpatient care service at a public hospital in the state of São Paulo. Data collection involved the use of the Palliative Performance Scale and the McGill QoL Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants were women, Catholic and living with a partner. The Palliative Performance Scale revealed a predominance of stable patients (score: ≥70 points). Overall, palliative care patients had lower QoL scores compared to the other groups (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QoL was worse among palliative care patients. Advanced age, being in palliative care, and have a low-income were negatively associated with a patient's QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"30 3","pages":"120-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.3.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A cancer diagnosis has a significant impact on a person's life, both physically and emotionally. However, the oncology patients' QoL (QoL) at different stages of the disease has been under investigated.

Aim: To assess and compare the QoL in three groups of oncology patients.

Methods: A comparative study was carried out in an outpatient care service at a public hospital in the state of São Paulo. Data collection involved the use of the Palliative Performance Scale and the McGill QoL Questionnaire.

Results: Most participants were women, Catholic and living with a partner. The Palliative Performance Scale revealed a predominance of stable patients (score: ≥70 points). Overall, palliative care patients had lower QoL scores compared to the other groups (p<0.01).

Conclusion: QoL was worse among palliative care patients. Advanced age, being in palliative care, and have a low-income were negatively associated with a patient's QoL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤患者生活质量的比较研究。
背景:癌症诊断会对患者的生活产生重大影响,包括身体上和情感上的影响。目的:评估并比较三组肿瘤患者的 QoL:在圣保罗州一家公立医院的门诊护理服务处开展了一项比较研究。数据收集包括姑息治疗表现量表和麦吉尔 QoL 问卷:大多数参与者为女性,信奉天主教并与伴侣同住。姑息治疗表现量表显示,病情稳定的患者占多数(得分≥70分)。总体而言,姑息治疗患者的 QoL 得分低于其他组别(p 结论:姑息治疗患者的 QoL 更差:姑息治疗患者的生活质量较差。高龄、接受姑息治疗和低收入与患者的生活质量呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barriers to healthcare professionals' ability to provide end-of-life care: a cross-sectional study. Addressing the missing framework of paediatric palliative care in Saudi Arabia. Continuity for family members of patients receiving palliative care. Calm amidst chaos. Mental health interventions for patients with haematological malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1