A Taste-intensity Visual Analog Scale: An Improved Zinc Taste-test Protocol.

Q3 Medicine Integrative medicine Pub Date : 2015-04-01
Matthew J Zdilla, Leah D Starkey, Julia R Saling
{"title":"A Taste-intensity Visual Analog Scale: An Improved Zinc Taste-test Protocol.","authors":"Matthew J Zdilla, Leah D Starkey, Julia R Saling","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Studies employing methods for measurement of zinc sulfate taste acuity have had diverse results, and although the studies have had limitations in design and implementation, they have suggested salient findings beyond the assessment of taste acuity. These findings have included, but were not limited to, relationships between zinc sulfate taste acuity and weight, levels of serum zinc, diastolic hypertension, levels of salivary carbonic anhydrase 6, and frequency of illness. However, current protocols for zinc sulfate taste assessment are problematic and warrant improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study intended to compare the ranking scale for the original Bryce-Smith and Simpson zinc taste test (BS-ZTT) with a novel, taste-intensity visual analog scale (TI-VAS) to explore the potential for improved zinc sulfate taste-acuity measurement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants were administered a 0.1% solution of zinc sulfate and assessed using the 2 scales.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place at West Liberty University, in West Liberty, WV, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were 500 West Liberty University students who volunteered to participate in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong, statistically significant, positive correlation existed between the BS-ZTT and the TI-VAS scores (r s = 0.79; P < .0001; n = 491).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that the BS-ZTT offered a limited number of ordinal variable ranks and depended on an examiner's evaluation. Conversely, the TI-VAS had an expanded range of variables and was independent of the examiner. The TI-VAS can be used as a taste-acuity test for zinc sulfate and as a benchmark for future analyses of zinc sulfate taste acuity and zinc taste tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":13593,"journal":{"name":"Integrative medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":"34-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Studies employing methods for measurement of zinc sulfate taste acuity have had diverse results, and although the studies have had limitations in design and implementation, they have suggested salient findings beyond the assessment of taste acuity. These findings have included, but were not limited to, relationships between zinc sulfate taste acuity and weight, levels of serum zinc, diastolic hypertension, levels of salivary carbonic anhydrase 6, and frequency of illness. However, current protocols for zinc sulfate taste assessment are problematic and warrant improvement.

Objective: The current study intended to compare the ranking scale for the original Bryce-Smith and Simpson zinc taste test (BS-ZTT) with a novel, taste-intensity visual analog scale (TI-VAS) to explore the potential for improved zinc sulfate taste-acuity measurement.

Design: Participants were administered a 0.1% solution of zinc sulfate and assessed using the 2 scales.

Setting: The study took place at West Liberty University, in West Liberty, WV, USA.

Participants: Participants were 500 West Liberty University students who volunteered to participate in the study.

Results: A strong, statistically significant, positive correlation existed between the BS-ZTT and the TI-VAS scores (r s = 0.79; P < .0001; n = 491).

Conclusions: The study found that the BS-ZTT offered a limited number of ordinal variable ranks and depended on an examiner's evaluation. Conversely, the TI-VAS had an expanded range of variables and was independent of the examiner. The TI-VAS can be used as a taste-acuity test for zinc sulfate and as a benchmark for future analyses of zinc sulfate taste acuity and zinc taste tests.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
味觉强度视觉模拟量表:锌味觉测试改进方案
背景:采用硫酸锌味觉敏锐度测量方法的研究结果各不相同,尽管这些研究在设计和实施方面存在局限性,但它们都提出了味觉敏锐度评估以外的突出发现。这些发现包括(但不限于)硫酸锌味觉敏锐度与体重、血清锌水平、舒张性高血压、唾液碳酸酐酶 6 水平和发病频率之间的关系。然而,目前的硫酸锌味觉评估方案存在问题,需要加以改进:本研究旨在将原始的布莱斯-史密斯和辛普森锌味觉测试(BS-ZTT)的等级量表与新型的味觉强度视觉模拟量表(TI-VAS)进行比较,以探索改进硫酸锌味觉敏锐度测量的可能性:设计:给参与者注射 0.1% 的硫酸锌溶液,并使用这两种量表进行评估:研究地点:美国西弗吉尼亚州西自由大学:参与者:500 名自愿参加研究的西自由大学学生:结果:BS-ZTT 和 TI-VAS 分数之间存在很强的正相关性,具有统计学意义(r s = 0.79;P < .0001;n = 491):研究发现,BS-ZTT 提供的顺序变量等级数量有限,并且依赖于检查者的评估。相反,TI-VAS 的变量范围更广,且独立于考官。TI-VAS 可用作硫酸锌味觉敏锐度测试,也可作为今后分析硫酸锌味觉敏锐度和锌味觉测试的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative medicine
Integrative medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Impact of Short-Term Integrated Yoga Therapy Intervention on Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Naturopathic Management to Taper Off Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Case Report. Revealing the in-office study findings of Daiwa Brain Health vs. Prevagen. The Road to Cancer Recovery for Melanie Cole and Caitlin Whyte. Thoughts on Establishing a New Standard for Assessing Toxic Load in the General Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1