Do consumers care about clean labels? Willingness to pay for simple ingredient lists and front-of-package labels on beef and plant-based burgers

IF 2.5 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1111/cjag.12346
Darnell Holt, Peter Slade, Jill Hobbs
{"title":"Do consumers care about clean labels? Willingness to pay for simple ingredient lists and front-of-package labels on beef and plant-based burgers","authors":"Darnell Holt,&nbsp;Peter Slade,&nbsp;Jill Hobbs","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We use an online hypothetical discrete choice experiment to examine willingness to pay for two dimensions of a clean label: simple ingredient lists and front-of-package labels. Experimental subjects were asked to choose between beef burgers, plant-based burgers, and hybrid burgers made with beef and plant protein. The burgers had either a simple or complex ingredient list and could also be labeled as organic or an excellent source of protein. Subjects were divided into two treatments: a treatment in which ingredient lists were always visible, and a treatment in which the ingredient lists were only visible if subjects clicked on the product image (click treatment). Subjects were willing to pay a premium of $4.55–$5.58 for products with simple ingredient lists in the visible ingredient treatment (relative to base prices of $5.00 to $12.50). This premium was reduced to $1.82–$2.29 in the click treatment. Willingness to pay for the organic and excellent source of protein labels was considerably lower and was generally insignificant, ranging from -$0.17 (and statistically insignificant) to $0.73. Willingness to pay for simple ingredient lists and front-of-package labels were not correlated, suggesting that demand for these attributes does not stem from an underlying preference for clean labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":55291,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","volume":"72 1","pages":"5-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use an online hypothetical discrete choice experiment to examine willingness to pay for two dimensions of a clean label: simple ingredient lists and front-of-package labels. Experimental subjects were asked to choose between beef burgers, plant-based burgers, and hybrid burgers made with beef and plant protein. The burgers had either a simple or complex ingredient list and could also be labeled as organic or an excellent source of protein. Subjects were divided into two treatments: a treatment in which ingredient lists were always visible, and a treatment in which the ingredient lists were only visible if subjects clicked on the product image (click treatment). Subjects were willing to pay a premium of $4.55–$5.58 for products with simple ingredient lists in the visible ingredient treatment (relative to base prices of $5.00 to $12.50). This premium was reduced to $1.82–$2.29 in the click treatment. Willingness to pay for the organic and excellent source of protein labels was considerably lower and was generally insignificant, ranging from -$0.17 (and statistically insignificant) to $0.73. Willingness to pay for simple ingredient lists and front-of-package labels were not correlated, suggesting that demand for these attributes does not stem from an underlying preference for clean labels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者关心清洁标签吗?愿意为牛肉和植物性汉堡的简单配料表和包装正面标签付费
我们通过一个在线假设离散选择实验来考察人们对清洁标签两个方面的支付意愿:简单的配料表和包装正面标签。实验对象被要求在牛肉汉堡、植物汉堡和牛肉与植物蛋白混合汉堡中做出选择。这些汉堡的配料表可以是简单的,也可以是复杂的,还可以标注为有机或优质蛋白质来源。受试者被分为两个处理:一个处理是配料表始终可见,另一个处理是只有当受试者点击产品图片时配料表才可见(点击处理)。在成分可见处理中,受试者愿意为成分列表简单的产品支付 4.55 美元至 5.58 美元的溢价(相对于 5 美元至 12.50 美元的基本价格)。在点击处理中,这一溢价降至 1.82 美元至 2.29 美元。对有机和优质蛋白质来源标签的支付意愿要低得多,而且一般不显著,从-0.17 美元(统计上不显著)到 0.73 美元不等。对简单配料表和包装正面标签的支付意愿并不相关,这表明对这些属性的需求并非源于对清洁标签的潜在偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie (CJAE) serves as a platform for scholarly research in agricultural, resource, and environmental economics, covering topics such as agri-food, agri-business, policy, resource utilization, and environmental impacts. It publishes a range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Quality cue or price anchoring: The effect of price on consumer behavior in repeat experiments Collateral damage: China's anti-dumping case against Canadian canola The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing Understanding the determinants of consumer grocery stockpiling behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1