‘It’s One Rule for Them and One for Us’: Occupational Classification, Gender and Worktime Domestic Labour

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Work Employment and Society Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1177/09500170241235864
Julie Monroe, Steve Vincent, Ana Lopes
{"title":"‘It’s One Rule for Them and One for Us’: Occupational Classification, Gender and Worktime Domestic Labour","authors":"Julie Monroe, Steve Vincent, Ana Lopes","doi":"10.1177/09500170241235864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we focus on gender and class to investigate worktime domestic labour. Methodologically, we extend a novel, comparative critical realist method in which occupation-based and gendered positions in productive and reproductive labour are foregrounded. By building theoretical connections between labour process conditions and collective rule-following practices, we illustrate how inequalities are inscribed organisationally. Our analysis provides a more critical contextualisation of technological affordances to develop the literature on how technology is implicated in the reproduction of social inequality. Moreover, our analysis identifies multi-level causal processes, which combine to explain the presence and actualisation of worktime domestic labour or its absence, which is due, principally, to fear of sanction. For realist researchers interested in diversity-based challenges, absences are important because they can point towards specific discriminatory mechanisms. Our investigation thus revealed a surprising level of class-related in-work inequality within the gendered dynamics of domestic work.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170241235864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we focus on gender and class to investigate worktime domestic labour. Methodologically, we extend a novel, comparative critical realist method in which occupation-based and gendered positions in productive and reproductive labour are foregrounded. By building theoretical connections between labour process conditions and collective rule-following practices, we illustrate how inequalities are inscribed organisationally. Our analysis provides a more critical contextualisation of technological affordances to develop the literature on how technology is implicated in the reproduction of social inequality. Moreover, our analysis identifies multi-level causal processes, which combine to explain the presence and actualisation of worktime domestic labour or its absence, which is due, principally, to fear of sanction. For realist researchers interested in diversity-based challenges, absences are important because they can point towards specific discriminatory mechanisms. Our investigation thus revealed a surprising level of class-related in-work inequality within the gendered dynamics of domestic work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们一个规则,我们一个规则":职业分类、性别与家务劳动时间
在本文中,我们以性别和阶级为重点,对工作时间的家务劳动进行研究。在方法论上,我们扩展了一种新颖的比较批判现实主义方法,在这种方法中,基于职业和性别的生产劳动和再生产劳动的地位得到了强调。通过在劳动过程条件和集体遵守规则的实践之间建立理论联系,我们说明了不平等是如何通过组织形式体现出来的。我们的分析为技术能力提供了一个更具批判性的背景,以发展有关技术如何与社会不平等的再生产相联系的文献。此外,我们的分析还确定了多层次的因果过程,这些过程共同解释了工作时间家务劳动的存在和实现,或者主要由于害怕制裁而导致的工作时间家务劳动的缺失。对于那些对基于多样性的挑战感兴趣的现实主义研究者来说,缺勤现象非常重要,因为它们可以指向特定的歧视机制。因此,我们的调查显示,在家务劳动的性别动态中,与阶级相关的在职不平等程度令人惊讶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
期刊最新文献
(Doing) Time Is Money: Confinement, Prison Work and the Reproduction of Carceral Capitalism Book Review: Tiziano Bonini and Emiliano Treré, Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight Against Platform Power Book Review: Sarah Waters, Suicide Voices: Labour Trauma in France Book Review: Pablo Pérez-Ahumada, Building Power to Shape Labor Policy: Unions, Employee Associations, and Reform in Neoliberal Chile Exploring Informal Work: Gaining Legitimation through Nudging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1