Efficacy of silodosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones 4 to 10 mm in diameter.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-10-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Mustafa Yuksel, Serdar Yilmaz, Husnu Tokgoz, Soner Yalcinkaya, Serkan Baş, Tümay Ipekci, Ali Yildiz, Nihat Ates, Murat Savas
{"title":"Efficacy of silodosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones 4 to 10 mm in diameter.","authors":"Mustafa Yuksel, Serdar Yilmaz, Husnu Tokgoz, Soner Yalcinkaya, Serkan Baş, Tümay Ipekci, Ali Yildiz, Nihat Ates, Murat Savas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Few studies have investigated the efficacy of silodosin, a recently introduced selective alpha 1-A adrenoceptor antagonist, in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteral calculi. The results of these studies, which all evaluated the efficacy of 8 mg/day, indicate that silodosin is a potential treatment for ureteral calculi. This study investigated the efficacy of 4 mg/day of silodosin for MET of distal ureteral stones 4 to 10 mm in diameter.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>After 70 patients had been randomized into 2 groups of 35 patients each, both the control and experimental groups (groups 1 and 2, respectively) were advised to take 75 mg/day of diclofenacsodiumas needed for pain relief but only the experimental group to take 4 mg/day of silodosin. After 21 days, the groups were compared regarding the stone expulsion rate and duration, number of renalcolicepisodes, and analgesicdosage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median expulsion rates were 71.4% and 91.4% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the difference between them was significant (P=0.031). The median expulsion durations were 12.91±6.14 and 8.03±4.99 days, respectively, and the difference between them was significant (P<0.001). No significant differences were found regarding the median number of renal colic episodes or median analgesic dosage. While no patients in group 1 experienced side effects, 5 patients (14%) in group 2 experienced retrograde ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that 4 mg/day of silodos in facilitates the expulsion of distal ureteral stones 4 to 10 mm in diameter but does not significantly reduce the number of renal colic episodes or analgesic dosage.</p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 10","pages":"19086-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4694437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have investigated the efficacy of silodosin, a recently introduced selective alpha 1-A adrenoceptor antagonist, in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteral calculi. The results of these studies, which all evaluated the efficacy of 8 mg/day, indicate that silodosin is a potential treatment for ureteral calculi. This study investigated the efficacy of 4 mg/day of silodosin for MET of distal ureteral stones 4 to 10 mm in diameter.

Material and method: After 70 patients had been randomized into 2 groups of 35 patients each, both the control and experimental groups (groups 1 and 2, respectively) were advised to take 75 mg/day of diclofenacsodiumas needed for pain relief but only the experimental group to take 4 mg/day of silodosin. After 21 days, the groups were compared regarding the stone expulsion rate and duration, number of renalcolicepisodes, and analgesicdosage.

Results: The median expulsion rates were 71.4% and 91.4% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the difference between them was significant (P=0.031). The median expulsion durations were 12.91±6.14 and 8.03±4.99 days, respectively, and the difference between them was significant (P<0.001). No significant differences were found regarding the median number of renal colic episodes or median analgesic dosage. While no patients in group 1 experienced side effects, 5 patients (14%) in group 2 experienced retrograde ejaculation.

Conclusion: These results indicate that 4 mg/day of silodos in facilitates the expulsion of distal ureteral stones 4 to 10 mm in diameter but does not significantly reduce the number of renal colic episodes or analgesic dosage.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西洛多辛治疗直径 4 至 10 毫米输尿管远端结石的疗效。
研究目的最近推出的一种选择性α1-A肾上腺素受体拮抗剂西洛多辛在输尿管结石的药物排石疗法(MET)中的疗效鲜有研究。这些研究都对 8 毫克/天的疗效进行了评估,结果表明西洛多辛具有治疗输尿管结石的潜力。本研究调查了西洛多辛每天 4 毫克治疗直径 4 至 10 毫米输尿管远端结石的疗效:将 70 名患者随机分为两组,每组 35 人,建议对照组和实验组(分别为第一组和第二组)每天服用 75 毫克双氯芬酸钠以缓解疼痛,但只建议实验组每天服用 4 毫克西洛多辛。21 天后,比较各组的结石排出率和持续时间、肾结石发作次数以及镇痛剂用量:结果:第 1 组和第 2 组的中位排石率分别为 71.4% 和 91.4%,差异显著(P=0.031)。排出时间的中位数分别为 12.91±6.14 天和 8.03±4.99 天,差异有显著性(P=0.031):这些结果表明,每天服用 4 毫克西洛多有助于排出直径为 4 至 10 毫米的输尿管远端结石,但不会显著减少肾绞痛发作次数或镇痛剂用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case report of moderate COVID-19 with an extremely long-term viral shedding period in China Lentivirus-Mediated knockdown of tectonic family member 1 inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation [Retraction]. Classification of MRI and psychological testing data based on support vector machine. Nucleostemin regulates proliferation and migration of gastric cancer and correlates with its malignancy [Retraction]. Effect of lipiodol and methylene blue on the thoracoscopic preoperative positioning [Retraction].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1