Gastrointestinal release site for delayed release and gelatin capsules in healthy dogs

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1111/jvp.13439
Charles B. Stone, Adam J. Rudinsky, Rebecca J. Urion, Simone B. March, Jenessa A. Winston
{"title":"Gastrointestinal release site for delayed release and gelatin capsules in healthy dogs","authors":"Charles B. Stone,&nbsp;Adam J. Rudinsky,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Urion,&nbsp;Simone B. March,&nbsp;Jenessa A. Winston","doi":"10.1111/jvp.13439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gelatin capsules deliver their contents to the stomach, while delayed-release (DR) capsules are designed to allow delivery to the small intestine. This study evaluated the gastrointestinal release site of DR capsules in six healthy adult dogs compared to gelatin capsules. Both gelatin and DR capsules were filled with barium-impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS™), and following enteral administration, release site was assessed using abdominal radiographs at baseline, immediately after ingestion, 15 min post-ingestion, 30 min post-ingestion, and then every 30 min thereafter. The evaluated phases included fasted conditions (phase 1, <i>n</i> = 6), increased meal size (phase 2, <i>n</i> = 2), double encapsulation (phase 3, <i>n</i> = 2), and altered capsule size (phase 4, <i>n</i> = 1). The released site was the stomach in all phases for both capsule types. In phase 1, DR capsules had a significantly prolonged time (median 60 min, range 60–90) to release BIPS™ compared to gelatin capsules (15 min, range 15–30; <i>p</i> = .03). In phase 2 (full meal size), 3 (double encapsulation), and 4 (smaller capsule size) pilot studies, release time was prolonged but still occurred in the stomach. This is similar to the release site for gelatin capsules but differs from the release site for DR capsules in people. This has implications for pharmacologic outcomes for products that are affected by gastric physiology (e.g. fecal microbiota transplantation). Based on this pilot data, clinicians and researchers should not assume DR capsules will allow for intestinal delivery of contents in dogs. Future studies should be conducted on larger and varied populations of dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"47 4","pages":"266-273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvp.13439","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvp.13439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gelatin capsules deliver their contents to the stomach, while delayed-release (DR) capsules are designed to allow delivery to the small intestine. This study evaluated the gastrointestinal release site of DR capsules in six healthy adult dogs compared to gelatin capsules. Both gelatin and DR capsules were filled with barium-impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS™), and following enteral administration, release site was assessed using abdominal radiographs at baseline, immediately after ingestion, 15 min post-ingestion, 30 min post-ingestion, and then every 30 min thereafter. The evaluated phases included fasted conditions (phase 1, n = 6), increased meal size (phase 2, n = 2), double encapsulation (phase 3, n = 2), and altered capsule size (phase 4, n = 1). The released site was the stomach in all phases for both capsule types. In phase 1, DR capsules had a significantly prolonged time (median 60 min, range 60–90) to release BIPS™ compared to gelatin capsules (15 min, range 15–30; p = .03). In phase 2 (full meal size), 3 (double encapsulation), and 4 (smaller capsule size) pilot studies, release time was prolonged but still occurred in the stomach. This is similar to the release site for gelatin capsules but differs from the release site for DR capsules in people. This has implications for pharmacologic outcomes for products that are affected by gastric physiology (e.g. fecal microbiota transplantation). Based on this pilot data, clinicians and researchers should not assume DR capsules will allow for intestinal delivery of contents in dogs. Future studies should be conducted on larger and varied populations of dogs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康狗胃肠道释放缓释胶囊和明胶胶囊的部位。
明胶胶囊可将内容物送入胃部,而缓释(DR)胶囊则可将内容物送入小肠。与明胶胶囊相比,本研究评估了六只健康成年犬体内 DR 胶囊的胃肠道释放部位。明胶胶囊和 DR 胶囊中都填充了钡浸渍聚乙烯球(BIPS™),在肠道给药后,分别在基线、进食后立即、进食后 15 分钟、进食后 30 分钟以及之后每隔 30 分钟使用腹部 X 光片对释放部位进行评估。评估阶段包括空腹状态(第 1 阶段,n = 6)、增加饭量(第 2 阶段,n = 2)、双层封装(第 3 阶段,n = 2)和改变胶囊大小(第 4 阶段,n = 1)。两种胶囊在所有阶段的释放部位都是胃。在第 1 阶段,DR 胶囊释放 BIPS™ 的时间(中位数 60 分钟,范围 60-90)明显长于明胶胶囊(15 分钟,范围 15-30;p = 0.03)。在第 2 阶段(全餐)、第 3 阶段(双重封装)和第 4 阶段(胶囊尺寸较小)的试验研究中,释放时间有所延长,但仍在胃中释放。这与明胶胶囊的释放部位相似,但与 DR 胶囊在人体内的释放部位不同。这对受胃生理影响的产品(如粪便微生物群移植)的药理结果有影响。根据这些试验数据,临床医生和研究人员不应认为 DR 胶囊可以在狗的肠道中输送内容物。未来的研究应该在更大和更多的狗群中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JVPT) is an international journal devoted to the publication of scientific papers in the basic and clinical aspects of veterinary pharmacology and toxicology, whether the study is in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo or in silico. The Journal is a forum for recent scientific information and developments in the discipline of veterinary pharmacology, including toxicology and therapeutics. Studies that are entirely in vitro will not be considered within the scope of JVPT unless the study has direct relevance to the use of the drug (including toxicants and feed additives) in veterinary species, or that it can be clearly demonstrated that a similar outcome would be expected in vivo. These studies should consider approved or widely used veterinary drugs and/or drugs with broad applicability to veterinary species.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Procaine, With and Without Epinephrine, Compared to Lidocaine in Local Anesthesia for Calves Before Thermocautery Disbudding. The Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of a Compounded Levetiracetam Formulation and Bioequivalence to a Commercial Formulation in Healthy Dogs. Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetic Studies in Sea Turtles: A Review. Issue Information Pharmacokinetics of Salbutamol in Thoroughbred Horses After a Single Intravenous or Inhaled Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1