Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-24 DOI:10.1080/01621424.2024.2331452
Yuko Yoshida, Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Young Jae Hong, Md Razib Mamun, Hiroko Shimizu, Yoshihisa Nakano, Hiroshi Yatsuya
{"title":"Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach.","authors":"Yuko Yoshida, Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Young Jae Hong, Md Razib Mamun, Hiroko Shimizu, Yoshihisa Nakano, Hiroshi Yatsuya","doi":"10.1080/01621424.2024.2331452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic assessments of interprofessional collaboration barriers and enablers in long-term care settings are critical for delivering person-centered healthcare. However, research on factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care settings is limited. For this study, 65 healthcare professionals across multiple facilities experienced in long-term care in Japan participated in online focus group discussions and individual interviews to discuss cases. The qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Seven themes emerged: coordination, the need for care manager training, hierarchy among healthcare professionals, specialization but not the mind-set of overspecialization, casual conversations, electronic group communication tools, and excessive fear of personal information protection. These findings highlight the need to develop coordinator roles and for interprofessional education on the proper approach to personal information protection laws. Furthermore, daily casual conversations, the use of online platforms, and the prevention of patients being left behind due to overspecialization are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":45875,"journal":{"name":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2024.2331452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systematic assessments of interprofessional collaboration barriers and enablers in long-term care settings are critical for delivering person-centered healthcare. However, research on factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care settings is limited. For this study, 65 healthcare professionals across multiple facilities experienced in long-term care in Japan participated in online focus group discussions and individual interviews to discuss cases. The qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Seven themes emerged: coordination, the need for care manager training, hierarchy among healthcare professionals, specialization but not the mind-set of overspecialization, casual conversations, electronic group communication tools, and excessive fear of personal information protection. These findings highlight the need to develop coordinator roles and for interprofessional education on the proper approach to personal information protection laws. Furthermore, daily casual conversations, the use of online platforms, and the prevention of patients being left behind due to overspecialization are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从多学科角度看影响长期护理专业间合作的因素:案例研究法。
对长期护理环境中的跨专业合作障碍和促进因素进行系统评估,对于提供以人为本的医疗保健服务至关重要。然而,有关影响长期护理机构中专业间合作因素的研究却十分有限。在这项研究中,65 名来自日本多个机构、具有长期护理经验的医护专业人员参加了在线焦点小组讨论和个别访谈,对案例进行了讨论。研究采用定性内容分析法对定性数据进行了分析。研究发现了七个主题:协调、护理经理培训的必要性、医护人员之间的等级制度、专业化但不过度专业化的心态、随意交谈、电子群组交流工具以及对个人信息保护的过度恐惧。这些发现突出表明,有必要发展协调者角色,并就个人信息保护法的正确做法开展跨专业教育。此外,还需要进行日常闲聊、使用网络平台,以及防止因过度专业化而将病人抛在脑后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Services Quarterly continues to publish important research on the cutting edge of home care and alternatives to long-term institutional care for the elderly, disabled, and other population groups that use in-home health care and other community services. The journal is aimed toward service providers and health care specialists involved with health care financing, evaluation of services, organization of services, and public policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Elderly Health Care Voucher Scheme in Hong Kong: needs assessment and an evaluation of outcomes. Optimism and resilience among the precariat: a gendered analysis of community home-based care work in South Africa. Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach. Resilience in home and community care registered practical nurses: a scoping review. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization among Home Care Aides in Washington, U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1