Once in Contact, Forever Contaminated! Introducing a Clinically Validated Imagery- and Video-Based Chain of Contagion Task for the Measurement of Disgust and Contamination Change in Experimental Research and Clinical Practice

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2024.03.002
{"title":"Once in Contact, Forever Contaminated! Introducing a Clinically Validated Imagery- and Video-Based Chain of Contagion Task for the Measurement of Disgust and Contamination Change in Experimental Research and Clinical Practice","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tolin et al. (2004) developed the Chain of Contagion Task (CCT) to experimentally test the law of contagion and looming vulnerability (LV). In the CCT, contaminated pencils are brought into contact with clean pencils. The degree of contamination transferred to further new pencils refers to the level of biased contagious beliefs. Although this could be an important transdiagnostic tool, the usability of the original paradigm has been very laborious. Therefore, an imagery- and video-based CCT is introduced and validated in Study 1 in a nonclinical sample with 85 participants. In Study 2, the imagery-based CCT was validated in a clinical study with 15 participants diagnosed with contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder (C-OCD), 15 participants suffering from an anxiety disorder, and 15 nonclinical controls. The number of participants is consistent with those in Tolin’s original sample and the statistical evaluation of Study 2 was preregistered. Both CCT could be validated and the results could be replicated. In the imagery-based CCT, the C-OCD group displayed significantly higher contamination ratings, avoidance tendencies and LV than the two control groups. We argue that this open access diagnostic instrument can be applied in research as well as in therapeutic practice (Download CCT videos and imagery: <span><span>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7730459</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"55 5","pages":"Pages 1043-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tolin et al. (2004) developed the Chain of Contagion Task (CCT) to experimentally test the law of contagion and looming vulnerability (LV). In the CCT, contaminated pencils are brought into contact with clean pencils. The degree of contamination transferred to further new pencils refers to the level of biased contagious beliefs. Although this could be an important transdiagnostic tool, the usability of the original paradigm has been very laborious. Therefore, an imagery- and video-based CCT is introduced and validated in Study 1 in a nonclinical sample with 85 participants. In Study 2, the imagery-based CCT was validated in a clinical study with 15 participants diagnosed with contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder (C-OCD), 15 participants suffering from an anxiety disorder, and 15 nonclinical controls. The number of participants is consistent with those in Tolin’s original sample and the statistical evaluation of Study 2 was preregistered. Both CCT could be validated and the results could be replicated. In the imagery-based CCT, the C-OCD group displayed significantly higher contamination ratings, avoidance tendencies and LV than the two control groups. We argue that this open access diagnostic instrument can be applied in research as well as in therapeutic practice (Download CCT videos and imagery: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7730459).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一旦接触,永远污染!在实验研究和临床实践中引入经临床验证的基于图像和视频的传染链任务,用于测量厌恶感和污染变化
开发了 "传染链任务"(CCT),通过实验来检验传染规律和隐现脆弱性(LV)。在 CCT 中,受污染的铅笔与干净的铅笔接触。转移到新铅笔上的污染程度指的是偏差传染信念的程度。尽管这可能是一种重要的跨诊断工具,但原始范例的可用性一直非常费力。因此,研究 1 引入了基于图像和视频的 CCT,并在 85 名非临床样本参与者中进行了验证。在研究 2 中,15 名被诊断患有污染相关强迫症(C-OCD)的参与者、15 名患有焦虑症的参与者和 15 名非临床对照组参与者在一项临床研究中对基于图像的 CCT 进行了验证。参与者人数与托林的原始样本一致,研究 2 的统计评估是预先登记的。两项 CCT 均可验证,结果也可重复。在基于意象的 CCT 中,C-OCD 组的污染评级、回避倾向和 LV 都明显高于两个对照组。我们认为,这种开放式诊断工具既可用于研究,也可用于治疗实践(下载 CCT 视频和图像:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7730459)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Underlying Working Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Exposure: Exploring the Role of Fearful Expectancies and Habituation Impact of a Brief Parenting Intervention on Parent and Infant Imitation Evaluating the Effectiveness of Safety Plans for Mitigating Suicide Risk in Two Samples of Psychiatrically Hospitalized Military Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1