Redesigning Rooms of Clients With Intellectual Disabilities and Severe Behavioral Problems in a Long-term Care Facility: Three Case Studies

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1007/s10882-024-09955-7
Jacqueline Roos, Andrea Möhn, Albert Ponsioen, Robert Didden
{"title":"Redesigning Rooms of Clients With Intellectual Disabilities and Severe Behavioral Problems in a Long-term Care Facility: Three Case Studies","authors":"Jacqueline Roos, Andrea Möhn, Albert Ponsioen, Robert Didden","doi":"10.1007/s10882-024-09955-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To observe changes in three clients with intellectual disabilities and severe behavioral problems and staff in a long-term care residential facility after redesigning the clients’ rooms by making them more personal and homely, adjusting the amount of stimuli, changing the layout, connecting to the outdoor area, and using high-quality natural materials. Relatively many clients with intellectual disabilities exhibit severe problem behaviors, including self-harm, aggression toward others, and repeated destruction of their own rooms, which can eventually result in a barren, inhumane living environment. Research on these clients is limited. Data were collected in a mixed methods study in which quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed. After the redesigns, positive changes were observed in the well-being and behavior of all three clients, for example, with respect to quality of life, privacy, freedom of choice, problem behavior, mood, cognition, activities of daily living, leisure activities, social behavior, self-harm, and constraints. There were no changes in the use of psychotropic medication. Quality of life scores increased in two cases, but were significant in only one. Emotional and behavioral problem scores decreased significantly in two cases, but in only one case these results were maintained at follow-up. Staff experienced a more pleasant, safe, and functional work environment, with improved provision of indicated care and interaction. Absenteeism decreased significantly in two of the three cases. Redesigning clients’ rooms could potentially be a promising intervention for clients with intellectual disabilities and severe chronic behavioral problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-024-09955-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To observe changes in three clients with intellectual disabilities and severe behavioral problems and staff in a long-term care residential facility after redesigning the clients’ rooms by making them more personal and homely, adjusting the amount of stimuli, changing the layout, connecting to the outdoor area, and using high-quality natural materials. Relatively many clients with intellectual disabilities exhibit severe problem behaviors, including self-harm, aggression toward others, and repeated destruction of their own rooms, which can eventually result in a barren, inhumane living environment. Research on these clients is limited. Data were collected in a mixed methods study in which quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed. After the redesigns, positive changes were observed in the well-being and behavior of all three clients, for example, with respect to quality of life, privacy, freedom of choice, problem behavior, mood, cognition, activities of daily living, leisure activities, social behavior, self-harm, and constraints. There were no changes in the use of psychotropic medication. Quality of life scores increased in two cases, but were significant in only one. Emotional and behavioral problem scores decreased significantly in two cases, but in only one case these results were maintained at follow-up. Staff experienced a more pleasant, safe, and functional work environment, with improved provision of indicated care and interaction. Absenteeism decreased significantly in two of the three cases. Redesigning clients’ rooms could potentially be a promising intervention for clients with intellectual disabilities and severe chronic behavioral problems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新设计长期护理机构中智障和严重行为问题客户的房间:三个案例研究
观察三位有严重行为问题的智障服务对象和长期护理机构的工作人员在重新设计服务对象的房间后的变化,包括使房间更加个性化和家庭化、调整刺激量、改变布局、与室外区域相连接以及使用高质量的天然材料。相对而言,许多智障服务对象会表现出严重的问题行为,包括自残、攻击他人、反复破坏自己的房间等,最终导致生活环境变得荒芜、不人道。针对这些客户的研究十分有限。本研究采用混合方法收集数据,对定量和定性数据进行分析。经过重新设计后,我们观察到这三位病人的福祉和行为都发生了积极的变化,例如在生活质量、隐私、选择自由、问题行为、情绪、认知、日常生活活动、休闲活动、社交行为、自残和约束等方面。精神药物的使用没有变化。有两个病例的生活质量评分有所提高,但只有一个病例的评分有显著提高。有两个病例的情绪和行为问题得分明显下降,但只有一个病例在随访时保持了这些结果。工作人员的工作环境更加愉快、安全和实用,所提供的护理和互动也有所改善。三个案例中有两个案例的缺勤率明显下降。对于有智力障碍和严重慢性行为问题的服务对象来说,重新设计服务对象的房间可能是一种很有前景的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original research and clinical reports from a variety of fields serving persons with developmental and physical disabilities. Submissions from researchers, clinicians, and related professionals in the fields of psychology, rehabilitation, special education, kinesiology, counseling, social work, psychiatry, nursing, and rehabilitation medicine are considered. Investigations utilizing group comparisons as well as single-case experimental designs are of primary interest. In addition, case studies that are of particular clinical relevance or that describe innovative evaluation and intervention techniques are welcome. All research and clinical reports should contain sufficient procedural detail so that readers can clearly understand what was done, how it was done, and why the strategy was selected. Rigorously conducted replication studies utilizing group and single-case designs are welcome irrespective of results obtained. In addition, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical discussions that contribute substantially to understanding the problems and strengths of persons with developmental and physical disabilities are considered for publication. Authors are encouraged to preregister empirical studies, replications, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in a relevant public database and to include such information with their submission to the journal. Authors are also encouraged, where possible and applicable, to deposit data that support the findings of their research in a public repository (see detailed “Research Data Policy” module in the journal’s Instructions for Authors). In response to the need for increased clinical and research endeavors with persons with developmental and physical disabilities, the journal is cross-categorical and unbiased methodologically.
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Choice: Examining the Beliefs and Practices of Behavior Analysts Working with Individuals with Disabilities Differences in Executive Functioning for children with additional learning needs and Autism Spectrum Disorder or Attachment Disorder Enhancing Assent and Treatment Outcomes: A Case Study on Responding to Aversive Ambient Auditory Stimuli for an Autistic Adult Perspectives of Transition-Aged Youth with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities about Self-Advocacy and Civic Engagement The Use of Multisensory Environments with Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1