Distribution of case volumes in surgery: an analysis of the British Spine Registry

Chan Hee Koh, William Muirhead, Danyal Zaman Khan, Hugo Layard Horsfall, George Prezerakos, Parag Sayal, Hani J Marcus
{"title":"Distribution of case volumes in surgery: an analysis of the British Spine Registry","authors":"Chan Hee Koh, William Muirhead, Danyal Zaman Khan, Hugo Layard Horsfall, George Prezerakos, Parag Sayal, Hani J Marcus","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To characterize the distribution of case volumes within a surgical field. Design An analysis of British Spine Registry. Setting 295 centers in England that conducted at least one spinal operation either within the NHS or private settings between 1 May 2016 and 27 February 2021. Participants 644 surgeons. Main outcome measures Mathematical descriptions of distributions of cases among surgeons and the extent of workforce-level case-volume concentration as a surrogate marker. Results There were wide variations in monthly caseloads between surgeons, ranging from 0 to average monthly high of 81.8 cases. The curves showed that 37.7% of surgeons were required to perform 80% of all spinal operations, which is substantially less than in fields outside of healthcare. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the case volumes of surgeons with the highest volumes dropped dramatically, whereas those with the lowest case numbers remained nearly unchanged. This, along with the relatively low level of case-volume concentration within spinal surgery, may indicate an inevitability of at least some level of surgical care being provided by the relatively lower volume surgeons. Conclusions While there is a reasonable degree of workforce-level case volume concentration within spinal surgery, with high volume spinal surgeons providing a large proportion of care, it is not clear whether a further concentration of case volumes into those few hands is possible or desirable. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data were obtained from the British Spine Registry for a fee. Any requests for the data must be made to the British Spine Registry, or otherwise may only be release with their permission.","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To characterize the distribution of case volumes within a surgical field. Design An analysis of British Spine Registry. Setting 295 centers in England that conducted at least one spinal operation either within the NHS or private settings between 1 May 2016 and 27 February 2021. Participants 644 surgeons. Main outcome measures Mathematical descriptions of distributions of cases among surgeons and the extent of workforce-level case-volume concentration as a surrogate marker. Results There were wide variations in monthly caseloads between surgeons, ranging from 0 to average monthly high of 81.8 cases. The curves showed that 37.7% of surgeons were required to perform 80% of all spinal operations, which is substantially less than in fields outside of healthcare. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the case volumes of surgeons with the highest volumes dropped dramatically, whereas those with the lowest case numbers remained nearly unchanged. This, along with the relatively low level of case-volume concentration within spinal surgery, may indicate an inevitability of at least some level of surgical care being provided by the relatively lower volume surgeons. Conclusions While there is a reasonable degree of workforce-level case volume concentration within spinal surgery, with high volume spinal surgeons providing a large proportion of care, it is not clear whether a further concentration of case volumes into those few hands is possible or desirable. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data were obtained from the British Spine Registry for a fee. Any requests for the data must be made to the British Spine Registry, or otherwise may only be release with their permission.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科手术病例量的分布:英国脊柱登记处的分析
目标 描述外科领域病例量的分布特征。设计 对英国脊柱注册中心进行分析。地点 英格兰 295 个中心,这些中心在 2016 年 5 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 27 日期间在英国国家医疗服务体系或私人机构中至少进行过一次脊柱手术。参与者 644 名外科医生。主要结果测量 外科医生病例分布的数学描述,以及作为替代指标的劳动力水平病例量集中程度。结果 外科医生之间的月病例量差异很大,从 0 例到平均每月最高 81.8 例不等。曲线显示,37.7% 的外科医生需要完成 80% 的脊柱手术,这大大低于医疗保健以外的其他领域。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,病例量最高的外科医生的病例量急剧下降,而病例量最低的外科医生的病例量几乎保持不变。这一点以及脊柱外科病例量相对较低的集中程度可能表明,至少在某种程度上,手术量相对较低的外科医生提供的手术治疗是不可避免的。结论 虽然脊柱外科的病例量在一定程度上比较集中,高病例量的脊柱外科医生提供了大部分的医疗服务,但进一步将病例量集中到这些少数医生手中是否可能或可取,目前尚不清楚。数据可能来自第三方,不对外公开。数据从英国脊柱登记处有偿获得。如需获取数据,必须向英国脊柱登记处提出申请,否则只能在征得其同意后方可发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Financial incentives and motivational intervention to improve gastric cancer screening in China: a randomized controlled trial study protocol. The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1