Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e72
Eun Hye Cho, Min-Seung Park, Hee-Yeon Woo, Hyosoon Park, Min-Jung Kwon
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening.","authors":"Eun Hye Cho, Min-Seung Park, Hee-Yeon Woo, Hyosoon Park, Min-Jung Kwon","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a leading cause of cervical cancer, of which human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 and HPV-18 account for about 70% of cases. Since HPV infection is common, it is important to focus on the HPV genotypes that pose the highest risk for effective cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 86,022 women aged 25 years or older was analyzed in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HPV genotyping and cytology were analyzed. In addition, we subdivided participants into two groups according to cytology results, negative for intraepithelial lesion of malignancy (NILM) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and analyzed absolute risk (AR) and relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or worse according to HPV genotype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AR of CIN 3 or worse was 77.0 times higher in HR-HPV-positive compared to HR-HPV-negative. Compared to 12 other HR-HPV-positive, the AR of CIN 3 or worse was 4.2 times higher in HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 positive. This finding was more evident in women with NILM than in women with ASC-US. The RR of CIN 3 or worse was 7.0 in women with NILM and 4.5 in women with ASC-US.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the cytology results, the risk of CIN 3 or worse was higher in HPV-16/HPV-18 than in other HR-HPV. HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping is recommended to screen women with a high risk of cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e72","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a leading cause of cervical cancer, of which human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 and HPV-18 account for about 70% of cases. Since HPV infection is common, it is important to focus on the HPV genotypes that pose the highest risk for effective cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening.

Methods: A total of 86,022 women aged 25 years or older was analyzed in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HPV genotyping and cytology were analyzed. In addition, we subdivided participants into two groups according to cytology results, negative for intraepithelial lesion of malignancy (NILM) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and analyzed absolute risk (AR) and relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or worse according to HPV genotype.

Results: The AR of CIN 3 or worse was 77.0 times higher in HR-HPV-positive compared to HR-HPV-negative. Compared to 12 other HR-HPV-positive, the AR of CIN 3 or worse was 4.2 times higher in HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 positive. This finding was more evident in women with NILM than in women with ASC-US. The RR of CIN 3 or worse was 7.0 in women with NILM and 4.5 in women with ASC-US.

Conclusion: Regardless of the cytology results, the risk of CIN 3 or worse was higher in HPV-16/HPV-18 than in other HR-HPV. HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping is recommended to screen women with a high risk of cervical cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 HPV-16 和 HPV-18 基因分型在宫颈癌筛查中的临床实用性。
目的:高危人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)感染是宫颈癌的主要病因,其中人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-16 和 HPV-18 约占 70%。由于 HPV 感染很常见,因此必须重点关注风险最高的 HPV 基因型,以便有效筛查宫颈癌。在这项研究中,我们评估了 HPV-16/HPV-18 基因分型在宫颈癌筛查中的临床实用性:方法:本研究共分析了 86,022 名 25 岁或以上的女性。分析了 HPV 基因分型和细胞学检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。此外,我们还根据细胞学结果将参与者分为两组,即恶性上皮内病变阴性组(NILM)和意义未定的非典型鳞状细胞组(ASC-US),并根据 HPV 基因型分析了宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)3 或更严重的绝对风险(AR)和相对风险(RR):结果:与HR-HPV阴性者相比,HR-HPV阳性者发生CIN 3或更严重的绝对风险是后者的77.0倍。与其他 12 名 HR-HPV 阳性者相比,HPV-16 和/或 HPV-18 阳性者的 CIN 3 或更严重的 AR 值要高出 4.2 倍。这一结果在NILM女性中比在ASC-US女性中更为明显。NILM 女性 CIN 3 或更严重的 RR 为 7.0,ASC-US 女性为 4.5:结论:无论细胞学结果如何,HPV-16/HPV-18 感染 CIN 3 或更严重的风险均高于其他 HR-HPV。建议对宫颈癌高风险妇女进行 HPV-16/HPV-18 基因分型筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening. Influence of cancer in pregnancy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: an observational retrospective cohort study. Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy. The prognostic significance of primary tumor site in vulvar cancer: a population-based cohort study. Genetic analysis of cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1