Decreases and Pronounced Geographic Variability in Antibiotic Prescribing in Medicaid.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12020046
Alexia G Aguilar, Priscilla C Canals, Maria Tian, Kimberly A Miller, Brian J Piper
{"title":"Decreases and Pronounced Geographic Variability in Antibiotic Prescribing in Medicaid.","authors":"Alexia G Aguilar, Priscilla C Canals, Maria Tian, Kimberly A Miller, Brian J Piper","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12020046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic resistance is a persistent and growing concern. Our objective was to analyze antibiotic prescribing in the United States (US) in the Medical Expenditure Panel System (MEPS) and to Medicaid patients. We obtained MEPS prescriptions for eight antibiotics from 2013 to 2020. We extracted prescribing rates per 1000 Medicaid enrollees for two years, 2018 and 2019, for four broad-spectrum (azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin) and four narrow-spectrum (amoxicillin, cephalexin, doxycycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) antibiotics. Antibiotic prescriptions in MEPS decreased from 2013 to 2020 by 38.7%, with a larger decline for the broad (-53.7%) than narrow (-23.5%) spectrum antibiotics. Antibiotic prescriptions in Medicaid decreased by 6.7%. Amoxicillin was the predominant antibiotic, followed by azithromycin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Substantial geographic variation in prescribing existed, with a 2.8-fold difference between the highest (Kentucky = 855/1000) and lowest (Oregon = 299) states. The South prescribed 52.2% more antibiotics (580/1000) than the West (381/1000). There were significant correlations across states (r = 0.81 for azithromycin and amoxicillin). This study identified sizable disparities by geography in the prescribing rates of eight antibiotics with over three-fold state-level differences. Areas with high prescribing rates, particularly for outpatients, may benefit from stewardship programs to reduce potentially unnecessary prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12020046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a persistent and growing concern. Our objective was to analyze antibiotic prescribing in the United States (US) in the Medical Expenditure Panel System (MEPS) and to Medicaid patients. We obtained MEPS prescriptions for eight antibiotics from 2013 to 2020. We extracted prescribing rates per 1000 Medicaid enrollees for two years, 2018 and 2019, for four broad-spectrum (azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin) and four narrow-spectrum (amoxicillin, cephalexin, doxycycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) antibiotics. Antibiotic prescriptions in MEPS decreased from 2013 to 2020 by 38.7%, with a larger decline for the broad (-53.7%) than narrow (-23.5%) spectrum antibiotics. Antibiotic prescriptions in Medicaid decreased by 6.7%. Amoxicillin was the predominant antibiotic, followed by azithromycin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Substantial geographic variation in prescribing existed, with a 2.8-fold difference between the highest (Kentucky = 855/1000) and lowest (Oregon = 299) states. The South prescribed 52.2% more antibiotics (580/1000) than the West (381/1000). There were significant correlations across states (r = 0.81 for azithromycin and amoxicillin). This study identified sizable disparities by geography in the prescribing rates of eight antibiotics with over three-fold state-level differences. Areas with high prescribing rates, particularly for outpatients, may benefit from stewardship programs to reduce potentially unnecessary prescribing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助中抗生素处方的减少和明显的地域差异。
抗生素耐药性是一个长期存在且日益令人担忧的问题。我们的目标是分析美国医疗支出面板系统(MEPS)中的抗生素处方以及医疗补助患者的抗生素处方。我们获得了 2013 年至 2020 年期间 MEPS 中八种抗生素的处方。我们提取了 2018 年和 2019 年这两年每 1000 名医疗补助参保者中四种广谱抗生素(阿奇霉素、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星)和四种窄谱抗生素(阿莫西林、头孢氨苄、强力霉素和三甲双胍-磺胺甲噁唑)的处方率。从 2013 年到 2020 年,MEPS 的抗生素处方减少了 38.7%,广谱抗生素(-53.7%)的降幅大于窄谱抗生素(-23.5%)。医疗补助计划中的抗生素处方减少了 6.7%。阿莫西林是最主要的抗生素,其次是阿奇霉素、头孢氨苄、三甲双胍-磺胺甲恶唑、强力霉素、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星。处方的地域差异很大,最高的州(肯塔基州 = 855/1000)和最低的州(俄勒冈州 = 299)之间相差 2.8 倍。南部地区的抗生素处方量(580/1000)比西部地区(381/1000)高出 52.2%。各州之间存在明显的相关性(阿奇霉素和阿莫西林的相关性为 0.81)。这项研究发现,八种抗生素的处方率在地域上存在巨大差异,各州之间的差异超过三倍。处方率较高的地区,尤其是门诊病人,可能会受益于管理计划,以减少潜在的不必要处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences of Patients Regarding Gender-Specific Aspects of Pain Management. Assessment of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions of Psycholeptics and Antidepressants in Outpatient Settings. Tackling Pharmaceutical Pollution Along the Product Lifecycle: Roles and Responsibilities for Producers, Regulators and Prescribers. Evaluating Pharmacists' Knowledge of Food-Drug Interactions in Croatia: Identifying Gaps and Opportunities. Cardiovascular Diseases and Metabolic Medications in the Lebanese Population: A Post Hoc Analysis from a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1