Linking a latent variable trait-state-occasion model of emotion regulation to cognitive control.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1080/02699931.2024.2332594
Bunmi O Olatunji, Kelly A Knowles, Alexandra M Adamis, David A Cole
{"title":"Linking a latent variable trait-state-occasion model of emotion regulation to cognitive control.","authors":"Bunmi O Olatunji, Kelly A Knowles, Alexandra M Adamis, David A Cole","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2332594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion dysregulation (ED) is a vulnerability factor for affective disorders that may originate from deficits in cognitive control (CC). Although measures of ED are often designed to assess trait-like tendencies, the extent to which such measures capture a time-varying (TV) or state-like construct versus a time-invariant (TI) or trait-like personality characteristic is unclear. The link between the TV and TI components of ED and CC is also unclear. In a 6-wave, 5-month longitudinal study, community participants (<i>n</i> = 1281) completed the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16), a commonly used measure of ED and measures of CC. A latent variable (trait-state-occasion) model showed that the proportion of TI factor variance (.80) was greater than the TV factor variance (.19). Although TV factor stability was significant, the coefficients were small in magnitude. Furthermore, regression weights for the ED TI factor (average <math><mtext>β</mtext></math> = -.62) were significant and larger than those for the TV factor (average <math><mtext>β</mtext></math> = -.10) in predicting latent CC at each of the six-time points. These findings suggest that ED, as assessed by the DERS-16, is largely TI and this TI component is more strongly linked to CC than the TV component.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2332594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion dysregulation (ED) is a vulnerability factor for affective disorders that may originate from deficits in cognitive control (CC). Although measures of ED are often designed to assess trait-like tendencies, the extent to which such measures capture a time-varying (TV) or state-like construct versus a time-invariant (TI) or trait-like personality characteristic is unclear. The link between the TV and TI components of ED and CC is also unclear. In a 6-wave, 5-month longitudinal study, community participants (n = 1281) completed the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16), a commonly used measure of ED and measures of CC. A latent variable (trait-state-occasion) model showed that the proportion of TI factor variance (.80) was greater than the TV factor variance (.19). Although TV factor stability was significant, the coefficients were small in magnitude. Furthermore, regression weights for the ED TI factor (average β = -.62) were significant and larger than those for the TV factor (average β = -.10) in predicting latent CC at each of the six-time points. These findings suggest that ED, as assessed by the DERS-16, is largely TI and this TI component is more strongly linked to CC than the TV component.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将情绪调节的潜变量特质-状态-事件模型与认知控制联系起来。
情绪失调(ED)是情感障碍的一个易感因素,可能源于认知控制(CC)的缺陷。尽管情绪失调的测量通常是为了评估特质样倾向而设计的,但此类测量在多大程度上捕捉到了时变(TV)或状态样结构,而不是时不变(TI)或特质样人格特征,目前尚不清楚。ED的TV和TI成分与CC之间的联系也不清楚。在一项为期 6 波、5 个月的纵向研究中,社区参与者(n = 1281)完成了情绪调节困难量表(DERS-16),这是一种常用的 ED 和 CC 测量方法。潜变量(特质-状态-事件)模型显示,TI因子方差(0.80)大于TV因子方差(0.19)。虽然 TV 因子的稳定性显著,但系数的幅度较小。此外,在预测六个时间点中每个时间点的潜在 CC 时,ED TI 因子(平均 β = -.62)的回归权重显著且大于 TV 因子(平均 β = -.10)的回归权重。这些研究结果表明,DERS-16 评估的 ED 主要是 TI,而 TI 因素比 TV 因素与 CC 的关联性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
期刊最新文献
Affect and executive function dynamics in primary school classrooms: an intensive longitudinal study. Does enhanced memory of disgust vs. fear images extend to involuntary memory? Pupil size and iris brightness interact to affect prosocial behaviour and affective responses. Remembering the blues: negative emotion during encoding improve memory recall in major depressive Disorder. The empathic measure of true emotion (EMOTE): a novel set of stimuli for measuring emotional responding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1