Factors associated with radiological misstaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective observational study

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.03.001
Mohammad Yasrab MD , Sameer Thakker MD , Michael J. Wright MS , Taha Ahmed MD , Jin He MD, PhD , Christopher L. Wolfgang MD, PhD , Linda C. Chu MD , Matthew J. Weiss MD, MBA , Satomi Kawamoto MD , Pamela T. Johnson MD , Elliot K. Fishman MD , Ammar A. Javed MD
{"title":"Factors associated with radiological misstaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective observational study","authors":"Mohammad Yasrab MD ,&nbsp;Sameer Thakker MD ,&nbsp;Michael J. Wright MS ,&nbsp;Taha Ahmed MD ,&nbsp;Jin He MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Wolfgang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Linda C. Chu MD ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Weiss MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Satomi Kawamoto MD ,&nbsp;Pamela T. Johnson MD ,&nbsp;Elliot K. Fishman MD ,&nbsp;Ammar A. Javed MD","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Accurate staging of disease is vital in determining appropriate care for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It has been shown that the quality of scans and the experience of a radiologist can impact computed tomography (CT) based assessment of disease. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the rereading of outside hospital (OH) CT by an expert radiologist and a repeat pancreatic protocol CT (PPCT) on staging of disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients evaluated at the our institute's pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (2006 to 2014) with OH scan and repeat PPCT performed within 30 days were included. In-house radiologists staged disease using OH scans and repeat PPCT, and factors associated with misstaging were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 100 patients, with a median time between OH scan and PPCT of 19 days (IQR: 13–23 days.) Stage migration was mostly accounted for by upstaging of disease (58.8 % to 83.3 %) in all comparison groups. When OH scans were rereviewed, 21.5 % of the misstaging was due to missed metastases, however, when rereads were compared to the PPCT, occult metastases accounted for the majority of misstaged patients (62.5 %). Potential factors associated with misstaging were primarily related to imaging technique.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A repeat PPCT results in increased detection of metastatic disease that rereviews of OH scans may otherwise miss. Accessible insurance coverage for repeat PPCT imaging even within 30 days of an OH scan could help optimize delivery of care and alleviate burdens associated with misstaging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 458-463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824000471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate staging of disease is vital in determining appropriate care for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It has been shown that the quality of scans and the experience of a radiologist can impact computed tomography (CT) based assessment of disease. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the rereading of outside hospital (OH) CT by an expert radiologist and a repeat pancreatic protocol CT (PPCT) on staging of disease.

Methods

Patients evaluated at the our institute's pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (2006 to 2014) with OH scan and repeat PPCT performed within 30 days were included. In-house radiologists staged disease using OH scans and repeat PPCT, and factors associated with misstaging were determined.

Results

The study included 100 patients, with a median time between OH scan and PPCT of 19 days (IQR: 13–23 days.) Stage migration was mostly accounted for by upstaging of disease (58.8 % to 83.3 %) in all comparison groups. When OH scans were rereviewed, 21.5 % of the misstaging was due to missed metastases, however, when rereads were compared to the PPCT, occult metastases accounted for the majority of misstaged patients (62.5 %). Potential factors associated with misstaging were primarily related to imaging technique.

Conclusion

A repeat PPCT results in increased detection of metastatic disease that rereviews of OH scans may otherwise miss. Accessible insurance coverage for repeat PPCT imaging even within 30 days of an OH scan could help optimize delivery of care and alleviate burdens associated with misstaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰腺导管腺癌放射学误诊的相关因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:准确的疾病分期对于确定胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的适当治疗至关重要。研究表明,扫描质量和放射科医生的经验会影响基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的疾病评估。本研究旨在评估由放射科专家重读院外(OH)CT 和重复胰腺 CT(PPCT)对疾病分期的影响:方法:纳入在我院胰腺多学科门诊接受评估的患者(2006-2014年),这些患者均在30天内接受了OH扫描和重复PPCT检查。内部放射科医生通过OH扫描和重复PPCT对疾病进行分期,并确定与错误分期相关的因素:在所有对比组中,分期迁移的主要原因是疾病的上分期(58.8% 至 83.3%)。对OH扫描进行复查时,21.5%的误分期是由于漏诊转移灶造成的,但将复查结果与PPCT进行比较时,大部分误分期患者(62.5%)是由于隐匿性转移灶造成的。与误诊相关的潜在因素主要与成像技术有关:结论:重复 PPCT 可提高转移性疾病的检出率,否则 OH 扫描的复查可能会漏诊转移性疾病。即使是在OH扫描后30天内,重复PPCT成像的保险范围也是可以覆盖的,这有助于优化医疗服务并减轻与错误分期相关的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Gender equality in radiology: 3 steps worth taking Breast Imaging: what women & healthcare professionals need to know #HeForShe in radiology: A toolkit for radiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1