Accuracy of the infrazygomatic orthodontic bone screws digital planning and surgical guided positioning: A observational study

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE APOS Trends in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.25259/apos_166_2023
Paolo Manzo, E. Paoletto, Federica Pellitteri, L. Brucculeri, Luca Lombardo
{"title":"Accuracy of the infrazygomatic orthodontic bone screws digital planning and surgical guided positioning: A observational study","authors":"Paolo Manzo, E. Paoletto, Federica Pellitteri, L. Brucculeri, Luca Lombardo","doi":"10.25259/apos_166_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of surgical guidance for the insertion of infrazygomatic (IFZ) miniscrews by means of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation.\n\n\n\nNine patients (five men and four women, from 14.8 to 41.4 years of age) were recruited for the study. Rhinoceros software was used to digitally plan the infrazygomatic miniscrew insertion with the INFRABSTEER method (INFRA-zygomatic and Buccal Shelf method), superimposing intraoral scans and a CBCT obtained at T0. No orthodontic movement was performed, and six months later a second CBCT was done (T1). Rhinoceros software was used to superimpose T0 and T1 files. Mesio-distal, bucco-palatal, and vertical linear discrepancy in cap and tip and an angular discrepancy between the mini-screws was measured. To check the repeatability of the measurements, the intraclass coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The significance level considered is P < 0.05. The ICCs are all >0.85 and significantly different from 0 (P < 0.05), indicating excellent repeatability of measurements.\n\n\n\nThe lowest mean linear distance was found to be the mesio-distal distance at the tip with 0.23 ± 0.241 mm. All linear distances produced an average distance of less than 0.5 mm, except for the bucco-palatal distance measured at the tip. The smallest angular measurement was obtained from the intersection of the axes of the miniscrews in the mesio-distal plane (1.58° ± 1.458°).\n\n\n\nThe combination of a digitally planned and a template-guided surgical positioning procedure allows excellent control of infrazygomatic miniscrews insertion.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_166_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of surgical guidance for the insertion of infrazygomatic (IFZ) miniscrews by means of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation. Nine patients (five men and four women, from 14.8 to 41.4 years of age) were recruited for the study. Rhinoceros software was used to digitally plan the infrazygomatic miniscrew insertion with the INFRABSTEER method (INFRA-zygomatic and Buccal Shelf method), superimposing intraoral scans and a CBCT obtained at T0. No orthodontic movement was performed, and six months later a second CBCT was done (T1). Rhinoceros software was used to superimpose T0 and T1 files. Mesio-distal, bucco-palatal, and vertical linear discrepancy in cap and tip and an angular discrepancy between the mini-screws was measured. To check the repeatability of the measurements, the intraclass coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The significance level considered is P < 0.05. The ICCs are all >0.85 and significantly different from 0 (P < 0.05), indicating excellent repeatability of measurements. The lowest mean linear distance was found to be the mesio-distal distance at the tip with 0.23 ± 0.241 mm. All linear distances produced an average distance of less than 0.5 mm, except for the bucco-palatal distance measured at the tip. The smallest angular measurement was obtained from the intersection of the axes of the miniscrews in the mesio-distal plane (1.58° ± 1.458°). The combination of a digitally planned and a template-guided surgical positioning procedure allows excellent control of infrazygomatic miniscrews insertion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颧骨下正畸骨螺钉数字规划和手术引导定位的准确性:观察研究
这项研究的目的是通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估颧下微型螺钉插入手术引导的准确性。研究共招募了九名患者(五男四女,年龄从 14.8 岁到 41.4 岁)。九名患者(五男四女,14.8 岁至 41.4 岁)参加了此次研究。研究人员使用 Rhinoceros 软件,通过叠加口内扫描图像和 T0 时获得的 CBCT 图像,使用 INFRABSTEER 方法(INFRA-颧骨和颊架方法)对颧骨下微型螺钉的插入进行数字化规划。六个月后进行第二次 CBCT 扫描(T1)。使用 Rhinoceros 软件叠加 T0 和 T1 文件。测量了牙冠和牙尖的中-瓣、颊-腭、垂直线性差异以及微型螺钉之间的角度差异。为了检查测量的重复性,计算了类内系数(ICC)。显著性水平为 P <0.05。ICC 均大于 0.85,且与 0 显著不同(P < 0.05),表明测量的重复性极佳。除了在顶端测量的颊腭间距外,所有线性距离的平均值都小于 0.5 毫米。最小的角度测量值来自迷你螺钉轴线在中远心平面的交点(1.58° ± 1.458°)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Comparison of coating stability and surface characterization of different esthetic NiTi arch wires – An in vivo study Accelerated and hybrid orthodontic treatment using a combination of 2D lingual appliance and in-house aligner: An anterior cross-bite and TMD case report after 1-year follow-up The perception of facial esthetics with regard to different buccal corridors and facial proportions Clinical effect of low-level laser therapy on pain perception after placement of initial orthodontic archwires Orthodontic treatment of a patient with pycnodysostosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1