Illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness in individuals living with advanced respiratory disease: an observational study

Charles C Reilly, I. Higginson, T. Chalder
{"title":"Illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness in individuals living with advanced respiratory disease: an observational study","authors":"Charles C Reilly, I. Higginson, T. Chalder","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00874-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the complexity and multidimensional nature of chronic breathlessness is key to its successful management. The aim of this study was to explore illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness in individuals living with advanced respiratory disease.A cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a feasibility randomised control trial of SELF-BREATHE for individuals living with chronic breathlessness due to advanced disease. All participants completed the following questionnaires: Numerical rating scale (NRS) breathlessness severity, NRS distress due to breathlessness, NRS self-efficacy for managing breathlessness, Dyspnoea 12, chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ), brief illness perception questionnaire (brief IPQ) and the cognitive and behavioural response questionnaire short version (CBRQ-S). The associations between the brief IPQ, CBRQ-S, NRS breathlessness severity, distress and self-efficacy, D-12 and CRQ were examined using Spearman's rho correlation coefficients. A Spearman's rho of≥0.50 was pre-defined as the threshold to denote important associations between variables. A p value <0.008 was considered statistically significant, to account for the number of comparisons performed.Illness perception items: consequences, identity, concern, and emotional response were associated with increased breathlessness severity, increased distress, reduced breathlessness self-management ability and lower health related quality of life. Symptom focusing and embarrassment avoidance were identified as important cognitive responses to chronic breathlessness.Interventions that directly target illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness may improve symptom burden, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life.","PeriodicalId":504874,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00874-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the complexity and multidimensional nature of chronic breathlessness is key to its successful management. The aim of this study was to explore illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness in individuals living with advanced respiratory disease.A cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a feasibility randomised control trial of SELF-BREATHE for individuals living with chronic breathlessness due to advanced disease. All participants completed the following questionnaires: Numerical rating scale (NRS) breathlessness severity, NRS distress due to breathlessness, NRS self-efficacy for managing breathlessness, Dyspnoea 12, chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ), brief illness perception questionnaire (brief IPQ) and the cognitive and behavioural response questionnaire short version (CBRQ-S). The associations between the brief IPQ, CBRQ-S, NRS breathlessness severity, distress and self-efficacy, D-12 and CRQ were examined using Spearman's rho correlation coefficients. A Spearman's rho of≥0.50 was pre-defined as the threshold to denote important associations between variables. A p value <0.008 was considered statistically significant, to account for the number of comparisons performed.Illness perception items: consequences, identity, concern, and emotional response were associated with increased breathlessness severity, increased distress, reduced breathlessness self-management ability and lower health related quality of life. Symptom focusing and embarrassment avoidance were identified as important cognitive responses to chronic breathlessness.Interventions that directly target illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness may improve symptom burden, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期呼吸系统疾病患者对长期呼吸困难的疾病感知、认知和行为反应:一项观察研究
了解慢性呼吸困难的复杂性和多面性是成功治疗的关键。本研究旨在探讨晚期呼吸系统疾病患者对疾病的感知、认知以及对慢性呼吸困难的行为反应。本研究对 "SELF-BREATHE "可行性随机对照试验的数据进行了横断面二次分析,该试验针对因晚期疾病而患有慢性呼吸困难的患者。所有参与者均填写了以下问卷:数字评分量表(NRS)呼吸困难严重程度、NRS 呼吸困难痛苦程度、NRS 呼吸困难自我控制能力、呼吸困难 12、慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(CRQ)、简明疾病认知问卷(简明 IPQ)以及认知和行为反应问卷简版(CBRQ-S)。使用 Spearman's rho 相关系数检验了简短 IPQ、CBRQ-S、NRS 呼吸困难严重程度、痛苦和自我效能、D-12 和 CRQ 之间的联系。Spearman's rho ≥0.50被预先设定为变量间重要关联的临界值。疾病感知项目:后果、身份、担忧和情绪反应与憋气严重程度增加、痛苦增加、憋气自我管理能力降低和健康相关生活质量降低有关。直接针对慢性憋气的疾病感知、认知和行为反应的干预措施可改善症状负担、自我效能和与健康相关的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary fibrosis in patients with auto-immune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a retrospective nationwide cohort study Long-term dupilumab efficacy in type 2 asthma regardless of baseline characteristics The prevalence and implications of depression and anxiety in patients with bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Neutrophil extracellular traps are associated with airways inflammation and increased severity of lung disease in Cystic Fibrosis Extracellular vesicles in sputum of children with cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1