Optimising project outcomes in complex environments: empirical insights on agile practices and stakeholder dynamics

T. S. Nguyen, Sherif Mohamed, Sherif Mostafa
{"title":"Optimising project outcomes in complex environments: empirical insights on agile practices and stakeholder dynamics","authors":"T. S. Nguyen, Sherif Mohamed, Sherif Mostafa","doi":"10.1108/bepam-06-2023-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study delves into the dynamics between Agile Response to Change (AR), Adaptive Scoping (AS), Stakeholder Engagement (SE) and Project Performance (PP), with a special focus on the moderating influence of Project Complexity (PC). The research, grounded in a thorough literature review, identifies critical gaps in these areas and examines the extent to which PC moderates the effects of AR, AS and SE on PP, offering new perspectives for managing complex projects.Design/methodology/approachThe research develops a conceptual model based on a critical analysis of existing literature. A comprehensive questionnaire was designed, incorporating 28 items to measure AR, AS, SE, PP and PC. Data was collected from 136 project managers across various industries, and the responses were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM) to explore the complex interplay between these variables.FindingsThe analysis revealed that internal AR (ARint) significantly enhances both quantitative (PPqt) and qualitative aspects of PP (PPql). AS and SE were found to positively influence PPql, but their impact on PPqt was not significant. Interestingly, PC was observed to negatively moderate the relationship between ARint and PPql, while its moderating effect on the relationship between ARint and PPql was not significant. The study also notes that PC does not significantly alter the positive correlations between AS, SE and PPql.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by elucidating the relationships between ARint, AS, SE and different dimensions of PP. It uniquely explores the role of PC as a moderating variable in these relationships, offering valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in the field of complex project management.","PeriodicalId":505703,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-06-2023-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study delves into the dynamics between Agile Response to Change (AR), Adaptive Scoping (AS), Stakeholder Engagement (SE) and Project Performance (PP), with a special focus on the moderating influence of Project Complexity (PC). The research, grounded in a thorough literature review, identifies critical gaps in these areas and examines the extent to which PC moderates the effects of AR, AS and SE on PP, offering new perspectives for managing complex projects.Design/methodology/approachThe research develops a conceptual model based on a critical analysis of existing literature. A comprehensive questionnaire was designed, incorporating 28 items to measure AR, AS, SE, PP and PC. Data was collected from 136 project managers across various industries, and the responses were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM) to explore the complex interplay between these variables.FindingsThe analysis revealed that internal AR (ARint) significantly enhances both quantitative (PPqt) and qualitative aspects of PP (PPql). AS and SE were found to positively influence PPql, but their impact on PPqt was not significant. Interestingly, PC was observed to negatively moderate the relationship between ARint and PPql, while its moderating effect on the relationship between ARint and PPql was not significant. The study also notes that PC does not significantly alter the positive correlations between AS, SE and PPql.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by elucidating the relationships between ARint, AS, SE and different dimensions of PP. It uniquely explores the role of PC as a moderating variable in these relationships, offering valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in the field of complex project management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在复杂环境中优化项目成果:关于敏捷实践和利益相关者动态的经验见解
目的 本研究深入探讨了敏捷应对变化(AR)、适应性范围界定(AS)、利益相关者参与(SE)与项目绩效(PP)之间的动态关系,并特别关注了项目复杂性(PC)的调节作用。该研究以全面的文献综述为基础,确定了这些领域的关键差距,并探讨了 PC 在多大程度上调节了 AR、AS 和 SE 对项目绩效的影响,为复杂项目的管理提供了新的视角。设计了一份综合问卷,包含 28 个项目,用于测量 AR、AS、SE、PP 和 PC。研究结果分析表明,内部 AR(ARint)显著增强了项目管理的定量(PPqt)和定性(PPql)方面。AS 和 SE 对 PPql 有积极影响,但对 PPqt 的影响不大。有趣的是,研究发现 PC 对 ARint 和 PPql 之间的关系具有负向调节作用,而其对 ARint 和 PPql 之间关系的调节作用并不显著。本研究阐明了 ARint、AS、SE 和 PP 不同维度之间的关系,为现有知识体系做出了贡献。它独特地探讨了 PC 在这些关系中作为调节变量的作用,为复杂项目管理领域的从业人员和研究人员提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problematic issues emerging during BIM implementation process in construction organizations Problematic issues emerging during BIM implementation process in construction organizations Awareness of net zero energy buildings among construction professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry Development of a blockchain-based embodied carbon estimator Carbon emission reduction in construction industry: qualitative insights on procurement, policies and artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1