Touchstones for the development of an inclusive approach for ecotourism as a service industry

Anupam Saxena, Sugandha Shanker, Deepa Sethi, Manisha Seth, Anurag Saxena
{"title":"Touchstones for the development of an inclusive approach for ecotourism as a service industry","authors":"Anupam Saxena, Sugandha Shanker, Deepa Sethi, Manisha Seth, Anurag Saxena","doi":"10.1108/bij-07-2023-0456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study was conducted to analyse the socio-ecological problems faced by the Suhelwa Wildlife Sanctuary and understand its potential and challenges for developing ecotourism following Triple Bottom Line (TBL) principles. The study also benchmarked best ecotourism practices across the globe to create an ecotourism plan that would provide alternative livelihood and help in sustainable management of the area by reducing poverty, dependency on forests and biodiversity protection.Design/methodology/approachSuhelwa Wildlife Sanctuary was chosen because this area has several socio-ecological crises with limited livelihood options, and there is an urgent need for alternative livelihood opportunities in the form of ecotourism. The study followed an ethnographic approach through observation, participant observation, and semi-structured interviews. Content and thematic analysis was conducted through Atlas Ti9.0 software for data analysis. Subsequently, benchmarking best ecotourism practices through a literature review was done to develop an ecotourism action plan.FindingsThe First finding was related to the study area divided into three themes: problems, potential for ecotourism development, and challenges for ecotourism development. The second finding was related to benchmarking best practices and suggesting an action plan.Originality/valueThis work studied an area not sufficiently acknowledged by academicians and policymakers concerning ecotourism development. The work also benchmarks the best practices for ecotourism and proposes a sight-specific ecotourism action plan in accordance with TBL.","PeriodicalId":502853,"journal":{"name":"Benchmarking: An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benchmarking: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2023-0456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study was conducted to analyse the socio-ecological problems faced by the Suhelwa Wildlife Sanctuary and understand its potential and challenges for developing ecotourism following Triple Bottom Line (TBL) principles. The study also benchmarked best ecotourism practices across the globe to create an ecotourism plan that would provide alternative livelihood and help in sustainable management of the area by reducing poverty, dependency on forests and biodiversity protection.Design/methodology/approachSuhelwa Wildlife Sanctuary was chosen because this area has several socio-ecological crises with limited livelihood options, and there is an urgent need for alternative livelihood opportunities in the form of ecotourism. The study followed an ethnographic approach through observation, participant observation, and semi-structured interviews. Content and thematic analysis was conducted through Atlas Ti9.0 software for data analysis. Subsequently, benchmarking best ecotourism practices through a literature review was done to develop an ecotourism action plan.FindingsThe First finding was related to the study area divided into three themes: problems, potential for ecotourism development, and challenges for ecotourism development. The second finding was related to benchmarking best practices and suggesting an action plan.Originality/valueThis work studied an area not sufficiently acknowledged by academicians and policymakers concerning ecotourism development. The work also benchmarks the best practices for ecotourism and proposes a sight-specific ecotourism action plan in accordance with TBL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为作为服务业的生态旅游制定包容性方法的试金石
目的 本研究旨在分析苏赫勒瓦野生动物保护区面临的社会生态问题,并了解其按照三重底线(TBL)原则发展生态旅游的潜力和挑战。该研究还以全球最佳生态旅游实践为基准,制定生态旅游计划,通过减少贫困、对森林的依赖和生物多样性保护,提供替代生计并帮助该地区实现可持续管理。选择苏赫勒瓦野生动物保护区是因为该地区存在多种社会生态危机,生计选择有限,迫切需要生态旅游形式的替代生计机会。研究采用人种学方法,通过观察、参与观察和半结构化访谈进行。通过 Atlas Ti9.0 软件对数据进行了内容和主题分析。第一项发现与研究区域有关,分为三个主题:问题、生态旅游发展潜力和生态旅游发展挑战。第二项研究结果与最佳实践基准和行动计划建议有关。这项工作还为生态旅游的最佳做法制定了基准,并根据 TBL 提出了针对具体景点的生态旅游行动计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Humanitarian supply chain resilience: does organizational flexibility matter? Impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) on foreign institutional investments in India: a machine learning perspective Analyzing barriers to sustainable healthcare waste disposal: a hybrid decision-making framework Intrinsic satisfaction and turnover intentions: the moderating roles of collegial and managerial values congruence Unraveling the role of digital leadership in developing digital dynamic capabilities for the digital transformation of firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1