Our business, not the robot’s: family conversations about privacy with social robots in the home

Leigh Levinson, Jessica McKinney, Christena Nippert-Eng, Randy Gomez, Selma Šabanović
{"title":"Our business, not the robot’s: family conversations about privacy with social robots in the home","authors":"Leigh Levinson, Jessica McKinney, Christena Nippert-Eng, Randy Gomez, Selma Šabanović","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1331347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The targeted use of social robots for the family demands a better understanding of multiple stakeholders’ privacy concerns, including those of parents and children. Through a co-learning workshop which introduced families to the functions and hypothetical use of social robots in the home, we present preliminary evidence from 6 families that exhibits how parents and children have different comfort levels with robots collecting and sharing information across different use contexts. Conversations and booklet answers reveal that parents adopted their child’s decision in scenarios where they expect children to have more agency, such as in cases of homework completion or cleaning up toys, and when children proposed what their parents found to be acceptable reasoning for their decisions. Families expressed relief when they shared the same reasoning when coming to conclusive decisions, signifying an agreement of boundary management between the robot and the family. In cases where parents and children did not agree, they rejected a binary, either-or decision and opted for a third type of response, reflecting skepticism, uncertainty and/or compromise. Our work highlights the benefits of involving parents and children in child- and family-centered research, including parental abilities to provide cognitive scaffolding and personalize hypothetical scenarios for their children.","PeriodicalId":504612,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":" 75","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1331347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The targeted use of social robots for the family demands a better understanding of multiple stakeholders’ privacy concerns, including those of parents and children. Through a co-learning workshop which introduced families to the functions and hypothetical use of social robots in the home, we present preliminary evidence from 6 families that exhibits how parents and children have different comfort levels with robots collecting and sharing information across different use contexts. Conversations and booklet answers reveal that parents adopted their child’s decision in scenarios where they expect children to have more agency, such as in cases of homework completion or cleaning up toys, and when children proposed what their parents found to be acceptable reasoning for their decisions. Families expressed relief when they shared the same reasoning when coming to conclusive decisions, signifying an agreement of boundary management between the robot and the family. In cases where parents and children did not agree, they rejected a binary, either-or decision and opted for a third type of response, reflecting skepticism, uncertainty and/or compromise. Our work highlights the benefits of involving parents and children in child- and family-centered research, including parental abilities to provide cognitive scaffolding and personalize hypothetical scenarios for their children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的事,不是机器人的事:关于家庭社交机器人隐私的家庭对话
要在家庭中有针对性地使用社交机器人,就必须更好地了解多方利益相关者(包括父母和孩子)对隐私的关注。通过共同学习研讨会向家庭介绍社交机器人在家庭中的功能和假设用途,我们从 6 个家庭中获得了初步证据,展示了在不同的使用环境下,父母和孩子对机器人收集和共享信息的舒适度如何不同。对话和手册答案显示,在父母希望孩子有更多自主权的情况下,如完成家庭作业或清理玩具,以及当孩子提出父母认为可以接受的决定理由时,父母会采纳孩子的决定。如果在做出最终决定时,双方的理由一致,这就意味着机器人和家庭在边界管理方面达成了一致,家庭也就如释重负。在父母和孩子意见不一致的情况下,他们拒绝二元对立、非此即彼的决定,而是选择第三种反应,反映出怀疑、不确定和/或妥协。我们的工作强调了让父母和孩子参与以儿童和家庭为中心的研究的益处,包括父母为孩子提供认知支架和个性化假设情景的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collective predictive coding hypothesis: symbol emergence as decentralized Bayesian inference Adaptive satellite attitude control for varying masses using deep reinforcement learning Towards reconciling usability and usefulness of policy explanations for sequential decision-making systems Semantic learning from keyframe demonstration using object attribute constraints Gaze detection as a social cue to initiate natural human-robot collaboration in an assembly task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1