Effect of needles distance of arteriovenous fistula cannulation on hemodialysis adequacy based on KT/V: a randomized controlled trial

Samad Karkhah, Majid Pourshaikhian, Saman Maroufizadeh, Pooyan Ghorbani Vajargah, P. Aghajanzadeh, Joseph Osuji, M. Moghadamnia
{"title":"Effect of needles distance of arteriovenous fistula cannulation on hemodialysis adequacy based on KT/V: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Samad Karkhah, Majid Pourshaikhian, Saman Maroufizadeh, Pooyan Ghorbani Vajargah, P. Aghajanzadeh, Joseph Osuji, M. Moghadamnia","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000001966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This study aims to assess the effect of needle distance of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation on hemodialysis adequacy based on KT/V.\n \n \n \n This study was a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups with 3 and 6 cm needle distances using block randomization. Data acquisition transpired through a comprehensive checklist encompassing demographic variables such as age and gender, alongside clinical metrics comprising actual weight, dry weight, average dialysis duration, fistula longevity, and KT/V rate.\n \n \n \n A total of 42 hemodialysis patients were enrolled in this investigation, with 21 allocated to the 3 cm needle distance group and another 21 to the 6 cm needle distance group. The mean post-hemodialysis KT/V values for the 3 cm and 6 cm needle distance groups were 1.25 (SD=0.25) and 1.42 (SD=0.24), respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). While there was no significant difference in the average pre- and post-hemodialysis KT/V values within the 3 cm needle distance group (t=1.93, P=0.068), the corresponding values for the 6 cm needle distance group exhibited a notable discrepancy (t=9.66, P<0.001).\n \n \n \n In general, a needle distance of 6 cm between arteriovenous points yielded superior enhancements in dialysis adequacy compared to a 3 cm needle distance following hemodialysis. Consequently, health administrators and policymakers may consider instituting efficacious interventions to scrutinize the care and therapeutic protocols for hemodialysis patients, involving the development of policies and applications.\n","PeriodicalId":503882,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine &amp; Surgery","volume":" 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine &amp; Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000001966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effect of needle distance of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation on hemodialysis adequacy based on KT/V. This study was a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups with 3 and 6 cm needle distances using block randomization. Data acquisition transpired through a comprehensive checklist encompassing demographic variables such as age and gender, alongside clinical metrics comprising actual weight, dry weight, average dialysis duration, fistula longevity, and KT/V rate. A total of 42 hemodialysis patients were enrolled in this investigation, with 21 allocated to the 3 cm needle distance group and another 21 to the 6 cm needle distance group. The mean post-hemodialysis KT/V values for the 3 cm and 6 cm needle distance groups were 1.25 (SD=0.25) and 1.42 (SD=0.24), respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). While there was no significant difference in the average pre- and post-hemodialysis KT/V values within the 3 cm needle distance group (t=1.93, P=0.068), the corresponding values for the 6 cm needle distance group exhibited a notable discrepancy (t=9.66, P<0.001). In general, a needle distance of 6 cm between arteriovenous points yielded superior enhancements in dialysis adequacy compared to a 3 cm needle distance following hemodialysis. Consequently, health administrators and policymakers may consider instituting efficacious interventions to scrutinize the care and therapeutic protocols for hemodialysis patients, involving the development of policies and applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 KT/V 的动静脉内瘘插管针距对血液透析充分性的影响:随机对照试验
本研究旨在根据 KT/V 评估动静脉内瘘插管针距对血液透析充分性的影响。 本研究是一项平行分组随机对照试验。符合纳入标准的患者被随机分为两组,针距分别为 3 厘米和 6 厘米。数据采集采用全面的核对表,包括年龄和性别等人口统计学变量,以及实际体重、干重、平均透析时间、瘘管寿命和 KT/V 率等临床指标。 共有 42 名血液透析患者参与了此次调查,其中 21 人被分配到针距为 3 厘米组,另外 21 人被分配到针距为 6 厘米组。3 厘米针距组和 6 厘米针距组血液透析后的 KT/V 平均值分别为 1.25(SD=0.25)和 1.42(SD=0.24),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。虽然 3 厘米针距组的血液透析前和透析后 KT/V 平均值没有明显差异(t=1.93,P=0.068),但 6 厘米针距组的相应值却有明显差异(t=9.66,P<0.001)。 总体而言,与血液透析后 3 厘米的针距相比,动静脉点之间 6 厘米的针距能更好地提高透析充分性。因此,卫生管理者和政策制定者可以考虑采取有效的干预措施,对血液透析患者的护理和治疗方案进行仔细检查,包括制定政策和应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biliary atresia with rare associations: a case report and literature review Unveiling the uncommon: A case report of avascular necrosis in the triquetrum bone without trauma A pocket practical guide on bibliometric analysis: bridging informatics with science in a rapid manner Anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in a symptomatic adult, a case report Challenges in diagnosing and managing hyper-IgE syndrome in a resource-limited setting: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1