Risky conclusions regarding shrinking rhino horns

IF 4.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION People and Nature Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1002/pan3.10552
S. M. Ferreira, M. ’t Sas‐Rolfes, D. Balfour, C. Barichievy, G. Chege, C. Dean, N. Doak, H. T. Dublin, R. du Toit, S. Ellis, R. H. Emslie, J. Flamand, M. Gadd, J. Gaymer, M. Hofmeyr, M. Knight, Y. Moodley, J. Shaw, L. Versteege, L. Vigne, F. von Houwald, S. Uri‐Khob, K. Mosweu
{"title":"Risky conclusions regarding shrinking rhino horns","authors":"S. M. Ferreira, M. ’t Sas‐Rolfes, D. Balfour, C. Barichievy, G. Chege, C. Dean, N. Doak, H. T. Dublin, R. du Toit, S. Ellis, R. H. Emslie, J. Flamand, M. Gadd, J. Gaymer, M. Hofmeyr, M. Knight, Y. Moodley, J. Shaw, L. Versteege, L. Vigne, F. von Houwald, S. Uri‐Khob, K. Mosweu","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nImage‐based analyses from an online repository on rhino horns asserted that declines in size over time could be the consequence of poaching and hunting.\n\nWe provide reflections on whether the sample was representative enough to make generalizations, the study adequately accounted for the main sources of horn‐size variation and the statistical methods were adequate to be confident in the results.\n\nThe sample had a limited representation, most coming from zoo animals. We highlight several sources of variance in horn size that such a sample could not evaluate robustly using linear regressions, both for establishing a proxy for horn size corrected for size of a rhino and assessing trends over time.\n\nNevertheless, horn poaching continues to be the key threat to rhinos. Addressing the underlying drivers of poaching and trafficking are key priorities for responsible public debate, policy making and interventions.\n\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.","PeriodicalId":52850,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Image‐based analyses from an online repository on rhino horns asserted that declines in size over time could be the consequence of poaching and hunting. We provide reflections on whether the sample was representative enough to make generalizations, the study adequately accounted for the main sources of horn‐size variation and the statistical methods were adequate to be confident in the results. The sample had a limited representation, most coming from zoo animals. We highlight several sources of variance in horn size that such a sample could not evaluate robustly using linear regressions, both for establishing a proxy for horn size corrected for size of a rhino and assessing trends over time. Nevertheless, horn poaching continues to be the key threat to rhinos. Addressing the underlying drivers of poaching and trafficking are key priorities for responsible public debate, policy making and interventions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于犀牛角萎缩的危险结论
我们对样本是否具有足够的代表性以进行归纳、研究是否充分考虑了犀牛角大小变化的主要来源以及统计方法是否足以让我们对结果充满信心等问题进行了反思。样本的代表性有限,大部分来自动物园的动物。我们强调了犀牛角大小变异的几个来源,这样的样本无法通过线性回归进行稳健的评估,无论是建立犀牛角大小的替代值(根据犀牛的大小进行校正),还是评估随时间变化的趋势。解决偷猎和贩运犀牛角的根本原因是负责任的公众辩论、政策制定和干预措施的关键优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
People and Nature
People and Nature Multiple-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
103
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
From cash to conservation: Which wildlife species appear on banknotes? Slugs Count: Assessing citizen scientist engagement and development, and the accuracy of their identifications The frequent five: Insights from interviews with urban wildlife professionals in Germany Gugwilx'ya'ansk and goats: Indigenous perspectives on governance, stewardship and relationality in mountain goat (mati) hunting in Gitga'at territory Using gross ecosystem product to harmonize biodiversity conservation and economic development in Southwestern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1