Predictors of Nursing Performance for Patient Safety among Nurses in Regional Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study

Siriporn Sangsrijan, T. Akkadechanunt, B. Chitpakdee, K. Abhicharttibutra
{"title":"Predictors of Nursing Performance for Patient Safety among Nurses in Regional Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Siriporn Sangsrijan, T. Akkadechanunt, B. Chitpakdee, K. Abhicharttibutra","doi":"10.60099/prijnr.2024.265725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nursing performance for patient safety is crucial for improving patient safety outcomes and quality of care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore nursing performance for patient safety and identify the predictability of patient safety knowledge, patient safety attitude, nurse practice environment, patient-to-nurse ratio, and nursing hours per patient day on nursing performance for patient safety. The participants included 234 nurses randomly selected from six regional hospitals across Thailand. The research instruments included a demographic data form, the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, the Patient Safety Principles and Knowledge Questionnaire, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, and the Nursing Performance for Patient Safety Scale, which yielded scale-level content validity indices ranging from .85 to .88. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from .81 to .98. Descriptive statistics and stepwise multiple regression were utilized for the data analysis.The results revealed that the nurses perceived overall nursing performance for patient safety at a high level. Patient-to-nurse ratio was the strongest predictor of nursing performance for patient safety, followed by patient safety knowledge, patient safety attitude, nurse practice environment, and nursing hours per patient day. All predictors could predict nursing performance for patient safety, accounting for 56.00% of the variance. Nurse administrators and policymakers can use the results of this study to develop strategies for improving nursing performance for patient safety. We recommend longitudinal studies using different samples of Thailand nurses in diverse settings to confirm results across the country.","PeriodicalId":44649,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2024.265725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing performance for patient safety is crucial for improving patient safety outcomes and quality of care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore nursing performance for patient safety and identify the predictability of patient safety knowledge, patient safety attitude, nurse practice environment, patient-to-nurse ratio, and nursing hours per patient day on nursing performance for patient safety. The participants included 234 nurses randomly selected from six regional hospitals across Thailand. The research instruments included a demographic data form, the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, the Patient Safety Principles and Knowledge Questionnaire, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, and the Nursing Performance for Patient Safety Scale, which yielded scale-level content validity indices ranging from .85 to .88. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from .81 to .98. Descriptive statistics and stepwise multiple regression were utilized for the data analysis.The results revealed that the nurses perceived overall nursing performance for patient safety at a high level. Patient-to-nurse ratio was the strongest predictor of nursing performance for patient safety, followed by patient safety knowledge, patient safety attitude, nurse practice environment, and nursing hours per patient day. All predictors could predict nursing performance for patient safety, accounting for 56.00% of the variance. Nurse administrators and policymakers can use the results of this study to develop strategies for improving nursing performance for patient safety. We recommend longitudinal studies using different samples of Thailand nurses in diverse settings to confirm results across the country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区医院护士患者安全护理绩效的预测因素:横断面研究
患者安全护理绩效对提高患者安全结果和护理质量至关重要。本横断面研究旨在探讨患者安全护理绩效,并确定患者安全知识、患者安全态度、护士执业环境、患者与护士的比例以及每位患者每天的护理时间对患者安全护理绩效的可预测性。研究对象包括从泰国六个地区医院随机抽取的 234 名护士。研究工具包括人口统计学数据表、护理工作指数实践环境量表、患者安全原则和知识问卷、安全态度问卷和患者安全护理绩效量表,量表内容效度指数为 0.85 至 0.88。克朗巴赫α系数介于 0.81 和 0.98 之间。数据分析采用了描述性统计和逐步多元回归法。结果显示,护士对患者安全的整体护理绩效感知水平较高。患者与护士的比例是患者安全护理绩效的最强预测因子,其次是患者安全知识、患者安全态度、护士执业环境和每天为患者提供的护理时间。所有预测因子都能预测患者安全护理绩效,占差异的 56.00%。护士管理者和政策制定者可以利用本研究的结果来制定改善患者安全护理绩效的策略。我们建议使用不同环境下的泰国护士样本进行纵向研究,以在全国范围内确认研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Family-Centered Care in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during the Visitation Restrictions After COVID-19 Pandemic Peak: A Qualitative Study of Parents’ and Nurses’ Perspectives Feasibility Study the Effectiveness of Self-care Promoting Program on Self-care Behavioral and Clinical Outcomes in People with Corneal Transplantation: A Quasi-experiment Study The Efficacy of Chemo-Cooling Gloves in Preventing Nail Toxicity among Thai Women Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Quasi-experimental Study Effects of an Early Breastfeeding Education and Proactive Telephone Support Program for Mothers of Preterm Infants: A Quasi-experimental Study Promoting Positive Thinking and Reducing Perceived Stress Using the Be Aware of Stress Smartphone Application among At-risk Adolescents: A Quasi-experimental Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1