The effect of physical therapy with goal attainment scaling on gait function in patients with subacute stroke

Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1142/s1013702525500015
Jung-Min Hong, Min-Hee Kim
{"title":"The effect of physical therapy with goal attainment scaling on gait function in patients with subacute stroke","authors":"Jung-Min Hong, Min-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1142/s1013702525500015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Correct goal setting for patients is one of the most important aspects of physical therapy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of physical therapy using goal attainment scaling (GAS) scores to assess the gait function in patients with subacute stroke and related factors. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the medical records of 129 patients with subacute stroke who had been treated with intensive rehabilitation intervention. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Bundang Cha Hospital (2021-06-008). The functional ambulation category (FAC) was used to set goals with the involvement of patients and their caregivers after the initial assessment, and raw GAS scores were calculated according to whether the goals were achieved through assessment one month later based on the FAC score. The groups were then divided according to the raw GAS scores (−1, 0, 1, or 2), and the general characteristics and clinical assessment scores were statistically analysed. Results: From our results, there were differences in clinical assessment scores based on raw scores on the GAS ([Formula: see text]) and correlation between raw scores on the GAS and improvement scores on the clinical assessment items ([Formula: see text]). Moreover, when the gait function measured by FAC was used as a GAS in subacute stroke patients, the better the function of Rivermead mobility index ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and Korean-mini-mental state examination ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) than the other clinical factors, the higher the goal attainment raw score. Conclusion: Functions, including cognitive function, should be included when setting goals to improve the gait function and should be considered when developing the neurological physiotherapy programmes. This study helps physicians and physical therapists who first apply functional gait assessment as a GAS to set the initial goals and improves patient and caregiver motivations by applying GAS to patients with lower initial cognitive levels.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013702525500015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Correct goal setting for patients is one of the most important aspects of physical therapy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of physical therapy using goal attainment scaling (GAS) scores to assess the gait function in patients with subacute stroke and related factors. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the medical records of 129 patients with subacute stroke who had been treated with intensive rehabilitation intervention. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Bundang Cha Hospital (2021-06-008). The functional ambulation category (FAC) was used to set goals with the involvement of patients and their caregivers after the initial assessment, and raw GAS scores were calculated according to whether the goals were achieved through assessment one month later based on the FAC score. The groups were then divided according to the raw GAS scores (−1, 0, 1, or 2), and the general characteristics and clinical assessment scores were statistically analysed. Results: From our results, there were differences in clinical assessment scores based on raw scores on the GAS ([Formula: see text]) and correlation between raw scores on the GAS and improvement scores on the clinical assessment items ([Formula: see text]). Moreover, when the gait function measured by FAC was used as a GAS in subacute stroke patients, the better the function of Rivermead mobility index ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and Korean-mini-mental state examination ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) than the other clinical factors, the higher the goal attainment raw score. Conclusion: Functions, including cognitive function, should be included when setting goals to improve the gait function and should be considered when developing the neurological physiotherapy programmes. This study helps physicians and physical therapists who first apply functional gait assessment as a GAS to set the initial goals and improves patient and caregiver motivations by applying GAS to patients with lower initial cognitive levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
采用目标达成量表的物理治疗对亚急性中风患者步态功能的影响
背景:为患者正确设定目标是物理治疗最重要的方面之一。研究目的本研究旨在探讨使用目标达成量表(GAS)评分评估亚急性卒中患者步态功能的物理治疗效果及相关因素。研究方法这项回顾性队列研究使用了 129 名接受过强化康复干预治疗的亚急性脑卒中患者的病历。本研究获得了盆唐医院机构审查委员会的批准(2021-06-008)。初次评估后,在患者及其护理人员的参与下,使用功能性行走类别(FAC)设定目标,并根据一个月后的评估结果,根据 FAC 分数计算是否实现目标的原始 GAS 分数。然后,根据原始 GAS 分数(-1、0、1 或 2)对各组进行划分,并对一般特征和临床评估分数进行统计分析。结果从我们的结果来看,根据 GAS 原始分数得出的临床评估分数存在差异([计算公式:见正文]),而 GAS 原始分数与临床评估项目的改善分数之间存在相关性([计算公式:见正文])。此外,当亚急性卒中患者使用 FAC 测量的步态功能作为 GAS 时,Rivermead 移动能力指数([公式:见正文],[公式:见正文])和韩式迷你精神状态检查([公式:见正文],[公式:见正文])的功能越好,达到目标的原始得分就越高。结论在制定改善步态功能的目标时,应将包括认知功能在内的各项功能纳入其中,并在制定神经物理治疗方案时加以考虑。这项研究有助于医生和物理治疗师在首次应用功能步态评估作为 GAS 时设定初始目标,并通过将 GAS 应用于初始认知水平较低的患者来提高患者和护理人员的积极性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1