A retrospective hydrological uncertainty analysis using precipitation estimation ensembles for a poorly gauged basin in High Mountain Asia

P. Reggiani, Oleksiy Boyko
{"title":"A retrospective hydrological uncertainty analysis using precipitation estimation ensembles for a poorly gauged basin in High Mountain Asia","authors":"P. Reggiani, Oleksiy Boyko","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0170.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nWe study the impact of uncertain precipitation estimates on simulated streamflows for the poorly gauged Yarlung Tsangpo basin (YTB), High Mountain Asia (HMA). A process-based hydrological model at 0.5 km resolution is driven by an ensemble of precipitation estimation products (PEPs), including analyzed ground observations, high-resolution precipitation estimates, climate data records and reanalyses over the 2008-2015 control period. The model is then forced retrospectively from 1983 onward to obtain seamless discharge estimates till 2007, a period for which there is very sparse flow data coverage. Whereas temperature forcing is considered deterministic, precipitation is sampled from the predictive distribution, which is obtained through processing PEPs by means of a probabilisitc processor of uncertainty. The employed Bayesian processor combines the PEPs and outputs the predictive densities of daily precipitation depth accumulation as well as the probability of precipitation occurrence, from which random precipitation fields for probabilistic model forcing are sampled. The predictive density of precipitation is conditional on the precipitation estimation predictors that are bias-corrected and variance adjusted. For the selected HMA study site, discharges simulated from reanalysis and climate data records score lowest against observations at three flow gauging points, whereas high-resolution satellite estimates perform better, but are still outperformed by precipitation fields obtained from analyzed observed precipitation and merged products, which were corrected against ground observations. The applied methodology indicates how missing flows for poorly gauged sites can be retrieved and is further extendable to hydrological projections of climate.","PeriodicalId":503314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0170.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the impact of uncertain precipitation estimates on simulated streamflows for the poorly gauged Yarlung Tsangpo basin (YTB), High Mountain Asia (HMA). A process-based hydrological model at 0.5 km resolution is driven by an ensemble of precipitation estimation products (PEPs), including analyzed ground observations, high-resolution precipitation estimates, climate data records and reanalyses over the 2008-2015 control period. The model is then forced retrospectively from 1983 onward to obtain seamless discharge estimates till 2007, a period for which there is very sparse flow data coverage. Whereas temperature forcing is considered deterministic, precipitation is sampled from the predictive distribution, which is obtained through processing PEPs by means of a probabilisitc processor of uncertainty. The employed Bayesian processor combines the PEPs and outputs the predictive densities of daily precipitation depth accumulation as well as the probability of precipitation occurrence, from which random precipitation fields for probabilistic model forcing are sampled. The predictive density of precipitation is conditional on the precipitation estimation predictors that are bias-corrected and variance adjusted. For the selected HMA study site, discharges simulated from reanalysis and climate data records score lowest against observations at three flow gauging points, whereas high-resolution satellite estimates perform better, but are still outperformed by precipitation fields obtained from analyzed observed precipitation and merged products, which were corrected against ground observations. The applied methodology indicates how missing flows for poorly gauged sites can be retrieved and is further extendable to hydrological projections of climate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用降水估测集合对亚洲高山缺测流域进行水文不确定性回顾分析
我们研究了亚洲高山地区(HMA)雅鲁藏布江流域(YTB)测量数据不足的情况下,不确定的降水量估计值对模拟溪流的影响。一个基于过程的 0.5 千米分辨率水文模型由一系列降水估算产品(PEPs)驱动,这些产品包括 2008-2015 年控制期内的分析地面观测数据、高分辨率降水估算数据、气候数据记录和再分析数据。然后从 1983 年起对模型进行追溯强迫,以获得直到 2007 年的无缝排放估算值,这一时期的流量数据非常稀少。温度强迫被认为是确定性的,而降水则是从预测分布中采样,预测分布是通过不确定性概率处理器处理 PEPs 而获得的。采用的贝叶斯处理器将 PEPs 结合起来,输出每日降水深度累积的预测密度以及降水发生的概率,并从中采样随机降水场,用于概率模型强迫。降水预测密度取决于经过偏差校正和方差调整的降水估算预测因子。在所选的 HMA 研究地点,根据三个流量测量点的观测数据,从再分析和气候数据记录模拟的排水量得分最低,而高分辨率卫星估算结果表现较好,但仍优于从分析观测降水和合并产品中获得的降水场,后者根据地面观测数据进行了校正。所应用的方法说明了如何检索测量条件较差站点的缺失流量,并可进一步扩展到气候水文预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the source and evolution of precipitation stable isotope composition across O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, USA Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output The Shrinking Great Salt Lake May Exacerbate Droughts by Reducing Local Precipitation: A Case Study In situ observations of rain rate and precipitation microphysics over the coastal area of South China: Perspectives for satellite validation Evaporation driven by Atmospheric Boundary Layer Processes over a Shallow Salt-Water Lagoon in the Altiplano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1