Cross-Border Central Places in the Bavarian-Czech border region – Closing the gap for services of general interest?

Stefan Bloßfeldt
{"title":"Cross-Border Central Places in the Bavarian-Czech border region – Closing the gap for services of general interest?","authors":"Stefan Bloßfeldt","doi":"10.14512/rur.1968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creating equal living conditions in rural border regions poses a particular challenge for policy-makers and planners. In addition to demographic factors, national borders negatively affect the sustainability of services of general interest. However, overcoming border-related barriers also holds potential to compensate for gaps in service provision. It is therefore noteworthy that Bavarian federal state planning has designated so-called cross-border central places (GRZO) since 1994. Since the instrument is not legally binding abroad, its effectiveness appears to be limited. Moreover, it is unclear to what extent cross-border public services on the basis of cross-border central places are perceived as a potential by the population concerned. In order to discuss this, guided interviews were conducted with citizens in affected Bavarian municipalities on the Czech border and complemented by expert interviews. On the one hand, the results indicate a limited perception of cross-border public services as a relevant potential. On the other hand, they point to some concrete expectations of the cross-border central places designation that have not yet been fulfilled and at times reinforce a latent feeling of being left behind.","PeriodicalId":507133,"journal":{"name":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning","volume":"21 10‐11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creating equal living conditions in rural border regions poses a particular challenge for policy-makers and planners. In addition to demographic factors, national borders negatively affect the sustainability of services of general interest. However, overcoming border-related barriers also holds potential to compensate for gaps in service provision. It is therefore noteworthy that Bavarian federal state planning has designated so-called cross-border central places (GRZO) since 1994. Since the instrument is not legally binding abroad, its effectiveness appears to be limited. Moreover, it is unclear to what extent cross-border public services on the basis of cross-border central places are perceived as a potential by the population concerned. In order to discuss this, guided interviews were conducted with citizens in affected Bavarian municipalities on the Czech border and complemented by expert interviews. On the one hand, the results indicate a limited perception of cross-border public services as a relevant potential. On the other hand, they point to some concrete expectations of the cross-border central places designation that have not yet been fulfilled and at times reinforce a latent feeling of being left behind.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴伐利亚-捷克边境地区的跨境中心--缩小普遍服务的差距?
在农村边境地区创造平等的生活条件对政策制定者和规划者提出了特殊的挑战。除人口因素外,国界对普遍关心的服务的可持续性也有负面影响。然而,克服与边境有关的障碍也有可能弥补服务提供方面的不足。因此,值得注意的是,巴伐利亚联邦州规划局自 1994 年起就指定了所谓的跨境中心地(GRZO)。由于该文书在国外不具有法律约束力,其效力似乎有限。此外,还不清楚相关居民在多大程度上认为以跨境中心地为基础的跨境公共服务具有潜力。为了讨论这个问题,我们对捷克边境巴伐利亚州受影响城市的市民进行了有指导的访谈,并辅之以专家访谈。一方面,访谈结果表明,人们对跨境公共服务的相关潜力认识有限。另一方面,他们也指出了一些尚未实现的对跨境中央场所指定的具体期望,并不时强化了一种被抛在后面的潜在感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing, alternatives and variants in municipal planning processes: general considerations and results of an empirical analysis Mapping access to medical service provision at micro-scale: Dynamics in supply and demand in Germany Raus aus der Komfortzone: Von kohlenstoffarmen zu umweltschonenden Städten Planning problems as epistemic problems. Notes on the debate about multiple truths in planning Book review of: Affolderbach, Julia; Schulz, Christian (2024): Wirtschaftsgeographien der Nachhaltigkeit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1