An Experimental Investigation into the Scope Assignment of Japanese and Chinese Quantifier-Negation Sentences

IF 0.9 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Languages Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.3390/languages9030111
Yunchuan Chen
{"title":"An Experimental Investigation into the Scope Assignment of Japanese and Chinese Quantifier-Negation Sentences","authors":"Yunchuan Chen","doi":"10.3390/languages9030111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantifier-Negation sentences such as all teachers did not use Sandy’s car are known to allow an inverse scope interpretation in English. However, there is a lack of experimental evidence to determine whether this interpretation is allowed in equivalent sentences in Japanese and Chinese. To address this issue, this study conducted a sentence–picture matching truth value judgment experiment in both Japanese and Chinese. The data suggested that Japanese Quantifier-Negation sentences do allow inverse scope readings, which suggests that the subject may be interpreted within the scope of negation. In contrast, Chinese Quantifier-Negation sentences prohibit inverse scope readings, which is in accordance with the strong scope rigidity consistently observed in this language. This paper also discussed how to develop a valid experiment for investigating scope ambiguities.","PeriodicalId":52329,"journal":{"name":"Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifier-Negation sentences such as all teachers did not use Sandy’s car are known to allow an inverse scope interpretation in English. However, there is a lack of experimental evidence to determine whether this interpretation is allowed in equivalent sentences in Japanese and Chinese. To address this issue, this study conducted a sentence–picture matching truth value judgment experiment in both Japanese and Chinese. The data suggested that Japanese Quantifier-Negation sentences do allow inverse scope readings, which suggests that the subject may be interpreted within the scope of negation. In contrast, Chinese Quantifier-Negation sentences prohibit inverse scope readings, which is in accordance with the strong scope rigidity consistently observed in this language. This paper also discussed how to develop a valid experiment for investigating scope ambiguities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日语和汉语量词否定句的范围分配实验研究
众所周知,英语中的量词否定句(如所有老师都没有使用 Sandy 的汽车)允许反范围解释。然而,日语和汉语中的等价句子是否允许这种解释,目前还缺乏实验证据。为了解决这个问题,本研究用日语和汉语进行了句子-图片匹配真值判断实验。数据表明,日语量词-否定句确实允许反范围解读,这表明主语可以在否定范围内被解读。与此相反,汉语的量词否定句则禁止逆范围解读,这与该语言一贯的强范围刚性是一致的。本文还讨论了如何开发有效的实验来研究范围歧义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Languages
Languages Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Empirical Mobile-Assisted Pronunciation Studies through a Perception–Production Lens Amplifying Parental Views about Language Choice When Raising Multilingual Children: Towards a Family-Centered Approach in Professional Contexts Causal Relations and Cohesive Strategies in the Narratives of Heritage Speakers of Russian in Their Two Languages Mind the Gap! Null Modals (and Other Functional Verbs) in Finite Complementation in Italo-Greek Chilean Spanish Intonational Plateaus and Their Pragmatic Functions: A Case of Contact with Mapudungun
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1