The role of clinical characteristics of Lyme borreliosis in predicting cognitive impairment

T. Malysh
{"title":"The role of clinical characteristics of Lyme borreliosis in predicting cognitive impairment","authors":"T. Malysh","doi":"10.22141/2224-0713.20.1.2024.1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Lyme disease is characterized by a wide polymorphism of clinical manifestations, including various lesions of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Along with neurological disorders, diverse manifestations and signs of cognitive impairments are often found. Despite the high prevalence of cognitive disorders in Lyme borreliosis, data on their frequency and risk factors are contradictory. The examination of cognitive status is still not included in the standard clinical examination of this category of patients. The aim of the study is to identify predictors that may independently influence the development of cognitive dysfunction in patients with Lyme borreliosis. Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study of 69 patients (47 females, 22 males) diagnosed with Lyme borreliosis, aged between 23 and 77 (average of 49.90 ± 16.26) years, was carried out. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used to evaluate cognitive function. To determine the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and its potential predictors, the participants were divided into two groups: patients without cognitive impairment (n = 30) and those with cognitive dysfunction (n = 39) based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score. Results. It was found that risk factors for the development of cognitive impairment include: diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis at the age of 45.5 years and older (hazard ratio (HR) 5.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.82–14.27]; p = 0.001), presence of neuroborreliosis (HR 5.98; 95% CI [2.0–17.8]; р < 0.001), Lyme carditis (HR 8.7; 95% CI [1.04–73.06]; р = 0.021), hypertension (HR 7.19; 95% CI [2.32–22.28]; р < 0.001), anxiety disorders. Conclusions. The prospect for further research is to study and analyze the features of the correlation between cognitive and psycho-emotional disorders and the quality of life of patients with different forms and duration of Lyme borreliosis.","PeriodicalId":14476,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL NEUROLOGICAL JOURNAL","volume":"6 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL NEUROLOGICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0713.20.1.2024.1044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Lyme disease is characterized by a wide polymorphism of clinical manifestations, including various lesions of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Along with neurological disorders, diverse manifestations and signs of cognitive impairments are often found. Despite the high prevalence of cognitive disorders in Lyme borreliosis, data on their frequency and risk factors are contradictory. The examination of cognitive status is still not included in the standard clinical examination of this category of patients. The aim of the study is to identify predictors that may independently influence the development of cognitive dysfunction in patients with Lyme borreliosis. Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study of 69 patients (47 females, 22 males) diagnosed with Lyme borreliosis, aged between 23 and 77 (average of 49.90 ± 16.26) years, was carried out. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used to evaluate cognitive function. To determine the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and its potential predictors, the participants were divided into two groups: patients without cognitive impairment (n = 30) and those with cognitive dysfunction (n = 39) based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score. Results. It was found that risk factors for the development of cognitive impairment include: diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis at the age of 45.5 years and older (hazard ratio (HR) 5.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.82–14.27]; p = 0.001), presence of neuroborreliosis (HR 5.98; 95% CI [2.0–17.8]; р < 0.001), Lyme carditis (HR 8.7; 95% CI [1.04–73.06]; р = 0.021), hypertension (HR 7.19; 95% CI [2.32–22.28]; р < 0.001), anxiety disorders. Conclusions. The prospect for further research is to study and analyze the features of the correlation between cognitive and psycho-emotional disorders and the quality of life of patients with different forms and duration of Lyme borreliosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱姆包虫病的临床特征在预测认知障碍方面的作用
背景。莱姆病的临床表现多种多样,包括中枢和周围神经系统的各种病变。除神经系统疾病外,认知障碍的表现和体征也多种多样。尽管认知障碍在莱姆-博雷利病中的发病率很高,但有关其发病频率和风险因素的数据却相互矛盾。对这类患者的标准临床检查仍未包括认知状况的检查。本研究旨在找出可能独立影响莱姆-博雷利病患者认知功能障碍发展的预测因素。材料与方法。对 69 名年龄在 23 岁至 77 岁(平均 49.90 ± 16.26)之间的莱姆病患者(47 名女性,22 名男性)进行了前瞻性队列研究。评估认知功能时使用了蒙特利尔认知评估。为确定认知功能障碍与其潜在预测因素之间的关系,根据蒙特利尔认知评估得分将参与者分为两组:无认知障碍患者(30 人)和认知功能障碍患者(39 人)。结果发现结果发现,出现认知障碍的风险因素包括:45.5 岁及以上诊断出莱姆包虫病(危险比 (HR) 5.09; 95% 置信区间 (CI) [1.82-14.27]; p = 0.001)、神经性包虫病(HR 5.98;95% CI [2.0-17.8];р < 0.001)、莱姆心肌炎(HR 8.7;95% CI [1.04-73.06];р = 0.021)、高血压(HR 7.19;95% CI [2.32-22.28];р < 0.001)、焦虑症。结论进一步研究的前景是研究和分析不同形式和病程的莱姆病患者的认知和心理情感障碍与生活质量之间的相关性特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of different types of postamputation residual limb pain amid full scale war Influence of the anatomical level of spinal cord injury on the severity of neurological impairments in spinal cord trauma A case report of a hemorrhagic stroke with atrial fibrillation in combination with hypertension Typical course of hippocampal sclerosis. Literature review The medical and psychological components of post-COVID syndrome: disorders of the cognitive and emotional sphere of a person
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1