On the Need for Accurate Brushstroke Segmentation of Tablet-Acquired Kinematic and Pressure Data: The Case of Unconstrained Tracing

Algorithms Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.3390/a17030128
Karly S. Franz, Grace Reszetnik, Tom Chau
{"title":"On the Need for Accurate Brushstroke Segmentation of Tablet-Acquired Kinematic and Pressure Data: The Case of Unconstrained Tracing","authors":"Karly S. Franz, Grace Reszetnik, Tom Chau","doi":"10.3390/a17030128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brushstroke segmentation algorithms are critical in computer-based analysis of fine motor control via handwriting, drawing, or tracing tasks. Current segmentation approaches typically rely only on one type of feature, either spatial, temporal, kinematic, or pressure. We introduce a segmentation algorithm that leverages both spatiotemporal and pressure features to accurately identify brushstrokes during a tracing task. The algorithm was tested on both a clinical and validation dataset. Using validation trials with incorrectly identified brushstrokes, we evaluated the impact of segmentation errors on commonly derived biomechanical features used in the literature to detect graphomotor pathologies. The algorithm exhibited robust performance on validation and clinical datasets, effectively identifying brushstrokes while simultaneously eliminating spurious, noisy data. Spatial and temporal features were most affected by incorrect segmentation, particularly those related to the distance between brushstrokes and in-air time, which experienced propagated errors of 99% and 95%, respectively. In contrast, kinematic features, such as velocity and acceleration, were minimally affected, with propagated errors between 0 to 12%. The proposed algorithm may help improve brushstroke segmentation in future studies of handwriting, drawing, or tracing tasks. Spatial and temporal features derived from tablet-acquired data should be considered with caution, given their sensitivity to segmentation errors and instrumentation characteristics.","PeriodicalId":502609,"journal":{"name":"Algorithms","volume":"360 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/a17030128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brushstroke segmentation algorithms are critical in computer-based analysis of fine motor control via handwriting, drawing, or tracing tasks. Current segmentation approaches typically rely only on one type of feature, either spatial, temporal, kinematic, or pressure. We introduce a segmentation algorithm that leverages both spatiotemporal and pressure features to accurately identify brushstrokes during a tracing task. The algorithm was tested on both a clinical and validation dataset. Using validation trials with incorrectly identified brushstrokes, we evaluated the impact of segmentation errors on commonly derived biomechanical features used in the literature to detect graphomotor pathologies. The algorithm exhibited robust performance on validation and clinical datasets, effectively identifying brushstrokes while simultaneously eliminating spurious, noisy data. Spatial and temporal features were most affected by incorrect segmentation, particularly those related to the distance between brushstrokes and in-air time, which experienced propagated errors of 99% and 95%, respectively. In contrast, kinematic features, such as velocity and acceleration, were minimally affected, with propagated errors between 0 to 12%. The proposed algorithm may help improve brushstroke segmentation in future studies of handwriting, drawing, or tracing tasks. Spatial and temporal features derived from tablet-acquired data should be considered with caution, given their sensitivity to segmentation errors and instrumentation characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对平板电脑获取的运动学和压力数据进行精确笔触分割的必要性:无约束追踪案例
笔触分割算法对于通过手写、绘画或描摹任务进行基于计算机的精细运动控制分析至关重要。目前的分割方法通常只依赖一种类型的特征,即空间、时间、运动或压力特征。我们介绍了一种利用时空和压力特征的分割算法,可在描画任务中准确识别笔触。该算法在临床和验证数据集上进行了测试。通过使用识别错误的笔画进行验证试验,我们评估了分割错误对文献中用于检测图形运动病理学的常见生物力学特征的影响。该算法在验证和临床数据集上表现出强劲的性能,在有效识别笔触的同时,还能消除虚假的噪声数据。空间和时间特征受错误分割的影响最大,尤其是与笔画间距离和空气中时间相关的特征,其传播误差分别为 99% 和 95%。相比之下,速度和加速度等运动学特征受到的影响最小,传播误差在 0 到 12% 之间。在未来的手写、绘画或描摹任务研究中,所提出的算法可能有助于改进笔触分割。从平板电脑获取的数据中得出的空间和时间特征应谨慎考虑,因为它们对分割误差和仪器特性非常敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Label-Setting Algorithm for Multi-Destination K Simple Shortest Paths Problem and Application A Quantum Approach for Exploring the Numerical Results of the Heat Equation Enhancing Indoor Positioning Accuracy with WLAN and WSN: A QPSO Hybrid Algorithm with Surface Tessellation Trajectory Classification and Recognition of Planar Mechanisms Based on ResNet18 Network Computational Test for Conditional Independence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1