Comparison of Tornado Damage Characteristics to Low-Altitude WSR-88D Radar Observations and Implications for Tornado Intensity Estimation

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1175/mwr-d-23-0242.1
Anthony W. Lyza, Matthew D. Flournoy, A. A. Alford
{"title":"Comparison of Tornado Damage Characteristics to Low-Altitude WSR-88D Radar Observations and Implications for Tornado Intensity Estimation","authors":"Anthony W. Lyza, Matthew D. Flournoy, A. A. Alford","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-23-0242.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nGiven the obvious difficulties in directly sampling tornadic wind fields, ongoing work continues to improve estimates of near-ground wind speeds in tornadoes. This study builds upon a recently proposed empirical relationship between radar-observed velocities in the lowest 150 m AGL and the theoretical peak 15-m AGL wind speed. We create and analyze a dataset of 194 velocity observations within tornadoes in the lowest 150 m AGL. These observations are drawn from 105 individual tornadoes that occurred across a diverse range of EF-scale ratings (EF0–4), convective modes (discrete supercell and quasi-linear convective system), geographical regions, and housing-unit densities (HUD). Comparing the radar-estimated and damage-estimated tornado wind speeds, and corresponding EF- and F-scale ratings, is the primary focus of the ensuing analysis. Consistent with recent work, damage-estimated tornado wind speeds tend to be lower than radar-estimated near-surface wind speeds, especially for stronger tornadoes. Damage- and radar-estimated wind speed differences are not strongly related to the availability of damage indicators (as measured by HUD). While some relationship exists—particularly underestimates of peak wind speeds for strong–violent tornadoes in low HUD areas—the tendency of radar-based strong/violent tornado intensity estimates to be meaningfully higher than EF-scale-based damage estimates exists across the HUD spectrum. The legacy F-scale wind speed ranges may ultimately provide a better estimate of peak tornado wind speeds at 10–15 m AGL for strong–violent tornadoes and a better damage-based intensity rating for all tornadoes. These results are contextualized with regards to ongoing community efforts to improve tornado intensity estimation.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"107 9‐12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-23-0242.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the obvious difficulties in directly sampling tornadic wind fields, ongoing work continues to improve estimates of near-ground wind speeds in tornadoes. This study builds upon a recently proposed empirical relationship between radar-observed velocities in the lowest 150 m AGL and the theoretical peak 15-m AGL wind speed. We create and analyze a dataset of 194 velocity observations within tornadoes in the lowest 150 m AGL. These observations are drawn from 105 individual tornadoes that occurred across a diverse range of EF-scale ratings (EF0–4), convective modes (discrete supercell and quasi-linear convective system), geographical regions, and housing-unit densities (HUD). Comparing the radar-estimated and damage-estimated tornado wind speeds, and corresponding EF- and F-scale ratings, is the primary focus of the ensuing analysis. Consistent with recent work, damage-estimated tornado wind speeds tend to be lower than radar-estimated near-surface wind speeds, especially for stronger tornadoes. Damage- and radar-estimated wind speed differences are not strongly related to the availability of damage indicators (as measured by HUD). While some relationship exists—particularly underestimates of peak wind speeds for strong–violent tornadoes in low HUD areas—the tendency of radar-based strong/violent tornado intensity estimates to be meaningfully higher than EF-scale-based damage estimates exists across the HUD spectrum. The legacy F-scale wind speed ranges may ultimately provide a better estimate of peak tornado wind speeds at 10–15 m AGL for strong–violent tornadoes and a better damage-based intensity rating for all tornadoes. These results are contextualized with regards to ongoing community efforts to improve tornado intensity estimation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
龙卷风破坏特征与低空 WSR-88D 雷达观测数据的比较及对龙卷风强度估计的影响
鉴于直接采集龙卷风风场样本存在明显困难,目前仍在继续努力改进龙卷风近地风速的估算。本研究基于最近提出的最低 150 米 AGL 雷达观测速度与 15 米 AGL 理论峰值风速之间的经验关系。我们创建并分析了一个包含 194 个龙卷风中最低 150 米 AGL 速度观测值的数据集。这些观测数据来自 105 个单独的龙卷风,这些龙卷风发生在不同的 EF 等级(EF0-4)、对流模式(离散超大型龙卷风和准线性对流系统)、地理区域和住房单位密度(HUD)范围内。比较雷达估测的龙卷风风速和损害估测的龙卷风风速,以及相应的 EF 和 F 级等级是接下来分析的主要重点。与最近的研究结果一致,龙卷风的破坏估测风速往往低于雷达估测的近地面风速,特别是对于较强的龙卷风。损害估测风速和雷达估测风速之间的差异与损害指标的可用性(如 HUD 所测量的)关系不大。虽然存在一些关系--特别是低 HUD 地区的强龙卷风的峰值风速被低估,但基于雷达的强/暴力龙卷风强度估计值明显高于基于 EF 等级的损害估计值的趋势存在于整个 HUD 范围内。传统的 F 级风速范围最终可能会更好地估算出强暴力龙卷风在 10-15 米高度时的峰值风速,并更好地估算出所有龙卷风的破坏强度等级。这些结果与社区正在进行的改进龙卷风强度估算的努力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Dual Antibacterial and Anticancer Functionality of Self-Assembled Dipeptide-Capped Silver Nanoparticles: Molecular Insights into Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions. Simultaneous Cross-Linking and Nanoparticle Anchoring by Dialdehyde Cellulose in Injectable Composite Chitosan/Polypyrrole Hydrogels. Biocompatibility of Additively Manufactured Fe-AZ31 Biodegradable Composites for Craniofacial Implant Applications. Decellularized Dermis ECM-Based Melanoma-on-a-Chip Model with Integrated Lymphatic and Vascular Networks for High-Throughput Drug Testing. Physically Cross-Linked Hydrogels Based on Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Gelatin for Independent Modulation of Mechanical Cues in Cell Adhesion Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1