Effects of early respacing on physico-mechanical properties of naturally regenerated Picea sitchensis in Great Britain

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Canadian Journal of Forest Research Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1139/cjfr-2023-0091
Andrew Price, J. Paul McLean, V. Stokes, Andrew David Cameron
{"title":"Effects of early respacing on physico-mechanical properties of naturally regenerated Picea sitchensis in Great Britain","authors":"Andrew Price, J. Paul McLean, V. Stokes, Andrew David Cameron","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2023-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural regeneration can reduce costs compared with replanting. However, its use requires knowledge about how either active or passive management will affect the balance between quality and quantity in the timber supply. This study aimed to quantify the effects of respacing on volume recovery and wood properties. Two British forest experiments using Picea sitchensis with various respacing distances and an un-respaced control were assessed 21-22 years after the treatments were applied. Tree dimensions were measured and used to quantify slenderness, merchantable volume and sawlog-volume. Wood properties were assessed on a sub-sample using mechanical testing. Generalised linear mixed models were used to examine differences between treatments and sites. Respacing decreased slenderness and increased relative sawlog volume and branch size. Wider respacing reduced wood strength and the widest respacing reduced wood stiffness. Respacing did not affect wood density. However, at the relatively low productivity sites considered here, respacing to 2.1m represented the best compromise for current markets. In summary, not respacing improved some wood properties, but reduced tree stability and the proportion and volume of sawlogs, which will negatively affect forest value.","PeriodicalId":9483,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2023-0091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural regeneration can reduce costs compared with replanting. However, its use requires knowledge about how either active or passive management will affect the balance between quality and quantity in the timber supply. This study aimed to quantify the effects of respacing on volume recovery and wood properties. Two British forest experiments using Picea sitchensis with various respacing distances and an un-respaced control were assessed 21-22 years after the treatments were applied. Tree dimensions were measured and used to quantify slenderness, merchantable volume and sawlog-volume. Wood properties were assessed on a sub-sample using mechanical testing. Generalised linear mixed models were used to examine differences between treatments and sites. Respacing decreased slenderness and increased relative sawlog volume and branch size. Wider respacing reduced wood strength and the widest respacing reduced wood stiffness. Respacing did not affect wood density. However, at the relatively low productivity sites considered here, respacing to 2.1m represented the best compromise for current markets. In summary, not respacing improved some wood properties, but reduced tree stability and the proportion and volume of sawlogs, which will negatively affect forest value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期移栽对英国天然更新红豆杉物理机械特性的影响
与重新种植相比,自然再生可以降低成本。然而,使用这种方法需要了解主动或被动管理将如何影响木材供应的质量和数量之间的平衡。本研究旨在量化呼吸法对体积恢复和木材特性的影响。使用不同间伐距离的西洋红豆杉和未间伐对照进行了两项英国森林实验,并在实施处理 21-22 年后进行了评估。对树木的尺寸进行了测量,并用于量化细长度、可销售体积和锯材体积。通过机械测试评估了子样本的木材特性。采用广义线性混合模型来检验处理和地点之间的差异。间伐降低了细长度,增加了相对锯材材积和树枝尺寸。较宽的间伐降低了木材强度,最宽的间伐降低了木材硬度。间伐对木材密度没有影响。然而,在这里考虑的生产力相对较低的地点,2.1 米的间伐是当前市场的最佳折衷方案。总之,不进行间伐可以改善木材的某些特性,但会降低树木的稳定性,减少锯材的比例和数量,从而对森林价值产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, the Canadian Journal of Forest Research is a monthly journal that features articles, reviews, notes and concept papers on a broad spectrum of forest sciences, including biometrics, conservation, disturbances, ecology, economics, entomology, genetics, hydrology, management, nutrient cycling, pathology, physiology, remote sensing, silviculture, social sciences, soils, stand dynamics, and wood science, all in relation to the understanding or management of ecosystem services. It also publishes special issues dedicated to a topic of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Alberta’s 2023 wildfires: context, factors and futures Assessing Soil Microbial Catabolic Diversity in Alder and Oak Plantations at Varying Developmental Stages The impact of climate on the dominant height and climate thresholds for P. elliottii, P. taeda, P. patula, and P. patula x P. tecunumanii plantation forests Individual Fertilization Response with Social Status and Crown Characteristics for Western Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) Effects of log booms on physical habitat, water quality, and benthic invertebrates in the lower Fraser River and estuary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1