Falta de conhecimento sobre os fatores de risco não ocupacionais da dor lombar entre profissionais de saúde ocupacional brasileiros: um estudo observacional transversal

Q4 Health Professions Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5427
Eduardo Gallas Leivas, Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Arthur de Sá Ferreira, Renato De Almeida, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira
{"title":"Falta de conhecimento sobre os fatores de risco não ocupacionais da dor lombar entre profissionais de saúde ocupacional brasileiros: um estudo observacional transversal","authors":"Eduardo Gallas Leivas, Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Arthur de Sá Ferreira, Renato De Almeida, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira","doi":"10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and is one of the main causes of disability in Brazil and around the world. LBP presents a multifactorial etiology, being extremely common in workers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify the knowledge about the LBP risk factors, beliefs and attitudes about the management of LBP among health professionals (physiotherapists and ergonomists) working in the occupational area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 81 Brazilian occupational health professionals. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire comprising professional data, sociodemographics, items about LBP risk factors, and the Brazilian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists. Knowledge, beliefs and attitudes were analyzed using the chi-square test for LBP risk factors and the linear regression model for health professionals' beliefs and attitudes. RESULTS: Obesity (7.4%), sitting for more than 2 hours (8.6%), physical activity (9.9%), lack of psychosocial support at work (11.1%) and consuming alcohol (37.0%) presented the lowest rate of knowledge about LBP risk factors by professionals. Items about general health showed the lowest knowledge. A balanced biomedical and psychosocial orientation of beliefs and attitudes about managing LBP was observed. CONCLUSION: Brazilian occupational health professionals lack knowledge about non-occupational LBP risk factors, especially general health status. These professionals also have balanced biomedical and psychosocial concepts in managing LBP.","PeriodicalId":36370,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and is one of the main causes of disability in Brazil and around the world. LBP presents a multifactorial etiology, being extremely common in workers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify the knowledge about the LBP risk factors, beliefs and attitudes about the management of LBP among health professionals (physiotherapists and ergonomists) working in the occupational area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 81 Brazilian occupational health professionals. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire comprising professional data, sociodemographics, items about LBP risk factors, and the Brazilian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists. Knowledge, beliefs and attitudes were analyzed using the chi-square test for LBP risk factors and the linear regression model for health professionals' beliefs and attitudes. RESULTS: Obesity (7.4%), sitting for more than 2 hours (8.6%), physical activity (9.9%), lack of psychosocial support at work (11.1%) and consuming alcohol (37.0%) presented the lowest rate of knowledge about LBP risk factors by professionals. Items about general health showed the lowest knowledge. A balanced biomedical and psychosocial orientation of beliefs and attitudes about managing LBP was observed. CONCLUSION: Brazilian occupational health professionals lack knowledge about non-occupational LBP risk factors, especially general health status. These professionals also have balanced biomedical and psychosocial concepts in managing LBP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西职业卫生专业人员对腰背痛的非职业风险因素缺乏了解:一项横断面观察研究
引言:腰背痛(LBP)在巴西和全世界都非常普遍,是导致残疾的主要原因之一。腰背痛的病因是多因素的,在工人中极为常见。目的:本研究旨在核实在职业领域工作的卫生专业人员(物理治疗师和人体工程学专家)对腰椎间盘突出症风险因素的了解、对管理腰椎间盘突出症的信念和态度。材料与方法:对 81 名巴西职业健康专业人员进行了横断面观察研究。参与者填写了一份电子问卷,其中包括专业数据、社会人口统计学、有关枸杞多糖症风险因素的项目以及巴西版物理治疗师疼痛态度和信念量表。采用卡方检验对枸杞痛风险因素的知识、信念和态度进行了分析,采用线性回归模型对医疗专业人员的信念和态度进行了分析。结果:肥胖(7.4%)、久坐超过 2 小时(8.6%)、体力活动(9.9%)、工作中缺乏社会心理支持(11.1%)和饮酒(37.0%)是专业人员对腰背痛风险因素了解最少的几项。关于一般健康的项目显示出最低的知识水平。在管理腰椎间盘突出症的信念和态度方面,生物医学和社会心理取向取得了平衡。结论:巴西职业健康专业人员缺乏对非职业性腰背痛风险因素的了解,尤其是一般健康状况。这些专业人员在管理腰椎间盘突出症方面的生物医学和社会心理观念也不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field and retrowalking in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a pilot study Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of Class IV Laser therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial Efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic field and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on painful shoulder following stroke Efficacy of pulmonary telerehabilitation on exercise tolerance, fatigue, perceived exertion, depression, and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors Improving walking via real-time visual feedback after stroke in treadmill training (RE-VISIT): a protocol for randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1