Science, technology, and innovation in health for the next twenty years: A survey analysis in Colombia

Oscar Espinosa, Gabriela Puentes, Jhonathan Rodríguez, Adriana Robayo, Juan-Manual Anaya
{"title":"Science, technology, and innovation in health for the next twenty years: A survey analysis in Colombia","authors":"Oscar Espinosa,&nbsp;Gabriela Puentes,&nbsp;Jhonathan Rodríguez,&nbsp;Adriana Robayo,&nbsp;Juan-Manual Anaya","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Colombia is a Latin American country with a very complex social and political context that has not allowed the allocation of sufficient resources to the fields of science, technology, and innovation (STI). This is particularly worrying for the area of health since not enough resources are allocated for public health, research, or education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The so-called “Great Survey in Health 2019” was administered online through the SurveyMonkey platform to 5298 people in different regions of the country, representing the public, private, and academic sectors. The questionnaire consisted of 46 open and closed questions, including demographic inquiries. Data analysis involved textual analytics and sentiment analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 56% of those surveyed were women within the adult life cycle. Most respondents had a postgraduate education. Greater participation was observed in the Oriental, Bogotá, and Antioquia regions, which also concentrate the largest number of resources for STI. Among the main recommendations derived from the results, priorities include investing in research, personalised medicine, promoting the social appropriation of knowledge, addressing mental health, regulating research through a statute, promoting undergraduate research, and establishing recertification exams to pursue excellence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this original study serve as a fundamental input to promote and strengthen the STI processes in life sciences and health. They serve as a guide to generate public policies and actions that guarantee better health and well-being for the Colombian population, strategically proposing a clear roadmap for the next 20 years.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":"3 2","pages":"78-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hcs2.87","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Colombia is a Latin American country with a very complex social and political context that has not allowed the allocation of sufficient resources to the fields of science, technology, and innovation (STI). This is particularly worrying for the area of health since not enough resources are allocated for public health, research, or education.

Methods

The so-called “Great Survey in Health 2019” was administered online through the SurveyMonkey platform to 5298 people in different regions of the country, representing the public, private, and academic sectors. The questionnaire consisted of 46 open and closed questions, including demographic inquiries. Data analysis involved textual analytics and sentiment analysis.

Results

Overall, 56% of those surveyed were women within the adult life cycle. Most respondents had a postgraduate education. Greater participation was observed in the Oriental, Bogotá, and Antioquia regions, which also concentrate the largest number of resources for STI. Among the main recommendations derived from the results, priorities include investing in research, personalised medicine, promoting the social appropriation of knowledge, addressing mental health, regulating research through a statute, promoting undergraduate research, and establishing recertification exams to pursue excellence.

Conclusion

The results of this original study serve as a fundamental input to promote and strengthen the STI processes in life sciences and health. They serve as a guide to generate public policies and actions that guarantee better health and well-being for the Colombian population, strategically proposing a clear roadmap for the next 20 years.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来二十年卫生领域的科学、技术和创新:哥伦比亚调查分析
哥伦比亚是一个社会和政治背景非常复杂的拉美国家,因此无法为科学、技术和创新(STI)领域分配足够的资源。所谓的 "2019 年健康大调查 "是通过 SurveyMonkey 平台对全国不同地区的 5298 名公共、私营和学术界代表进行的在线调查。问卷由 46 个开放式和封闭式问题组成,包括人口统计学调查。数据分析包括文本分析和情感分析。总体而言,56% 的受访者为成年女性。大多数受访者受过研究生教育。东方、波哥大和安蒂奥基亚地区的参与度更高,这些地区也集中了最多的科技创新资源。根据调查结果提出的主要建议中,优先事项包括投资于研究、个性化医疗、促进知识的社会占有、解决心理健康问题、通过法规规范研究、促进本科生研究以及设立再认证考试以追求卓越。这项原创性研究的成果为促进和加强生命科学与健康领域的科技创新进程提供了基本投入,也为制定公共政策和行动提供了指导,从而确保哥伦比亚人民享有更好的健康和福祉,并从战略高度为未来 20 年提出了明确的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study protocol: A national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023. Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers. Innovative public strategies in response to COVID-19: A review of practices from China. Sixty years of ethical evolution: The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). A novel ensemble ARIMA-LSTM approach for evaluating COVID-19 cases and future outbreak preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1