Identifying High-Risk ZIP Codes for Childhood Lead Exposure: A Statewide ZCTA-Level Priority List for North Carolina

Q2 Medicine North Carolina Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.18043/001c.94878
Rashida Callender, Carolina Avendano, Mercedes A. Bravo, Joshua L. Tootoo, Ed Norman, Marie Lynn Miranda
{"title":"Identifying High-Risk ZIP Codes for Childhood Lead Exposure: A Statewide ZCTA-Level Priority List for North Carolina","authors":"Rashida Callender, Carolina Avendano, Mercedes A. Bravo, Joshua L. Tootoo, Ed Norman, Marie Lynn Miranda","doi":"10.18043/001c.94878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has consistently shown that there is no safe blood lead level (BLL) for children. Despite progress in lead poisoning prevention, lead exposure remains a persistent threat to the health and neurological development of children. To identify high-risk ZIP codes for use by families and health care providers for the entire state of North Carolina, we developed a risk model using ZIP Code Tabula­tion Area (ZCTA)-level census data. We obtained all available BLL testing data from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services for the years 2010–2015 via data use agreement. We fit a multivariable regression model with the ZCTA-level mean of log normalized BLLs as the de­pendent variable and ZCTA-level census data for known risk factors of childhood lead exposure as predictors. We used this model to create a priority risk categorization. We organized ZCTAs into 20 quantiles, or priority risk categories, that can be used in local and statewide screening programs. The first six (of 20) quantiles were identified as particularly high-risk areas for childhood lead exposure. Because BLL testing is not universal, the BLL testing data used in this study are likely biased toward those most at risk for lead exposure. This study demonstrates the utility of ZCTA-level census data in identifying high-risk ZIP codes for childhood lead exposure, which can be used to ensure that the highest-risk children are tested in a timely manner. This approach can be replicated to address lead exposure nationally.","PeriodicalId":39574,"journal":{"name":"North Carolina Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Carolina Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18043/001c.94878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has consistently shown that there is no safe blood lead level (BLL) for children. Despite progress in lead poisoning prevention, lead exposure remains a persistent threat to the health and neurological development of children. To identify high-risk ZIP codes for use by families and health care providers for the entire state of North Carolina, we developed a risk model using ZIP Code Tabula­tion Area (ZCTA)-level census data. We obtained all available BLL testing data from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services for the years 2010–2015 via data use agreement. We fit a multivariable regression model with the ZCTA-level mean of log normalized BLLs as the de­pendent variable and ZCTA-level census data for known risk factors of childhood lead exposure as predictors. We used this model to create a priority risk categorization. We organized ZCTAs into 20 quantiles, or priority risk categories, that can be used in local and statewide screening programs. The first six (of 20) quantiles were identified as particularly high-risk areas for childhood lead exposure. Because BLL testing is not universal, the BLL testing data used in this study are likely biased toward those most at risk for lead exposure. This study demonstrates the utility of ZCTA-level census data in identifying high-risk ZIP codes for childhood lead exposure, which can be used to ensure that the highest-risk children are tested in a timely manner. This approach can be replicated to address lead exposure nationally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定儿童铅暴露的高风险邮政编码:北卡罗来纳州全州 ZCTA 级优先列表
研究一致表明,儿童的血铅含量 (BLL) 没有安全值。尽管在预防铅中毒方面取得了进展,但铅暴露仍然对儿童的健康和神经系统发育构成持续威胁。为了确定北卡罗来纳州全境的高风险邮政编码,供家庭和医疗服务提供者使用,我们利用邮政编码表区 (ZCTA) 级人口普查数据开发了一个风险模型。我们通过数据使用协议从北卡罗来纳州卫生与公众服务部获得了 2010-2015 年的所有可用 BLL 检测数据。我们以 ZCTA 级对数归一化 BLL 平均值为因变量,以 ZCTA 级人口普查数据中已知的儿童铅暴露风险因素为预测因子,拟合了一个多变量回归模型。我们使用该模型创建了优先风险分类。我们将 ZCTA 划分为 20 个量级,即优先风险类别,可用于地方和全州范围内的筛查计划。前六个量级(共 20 个量级)被确定为儿童铅暴露的高风险地区。由于 BLL 检测并不普遍,本研究中使用的 BLL 检测数据很可能偏向于铅暴露风险最高的人群。本研究证明了 ZCTA 级人口普查数据在确定儿童铅暴露高风险邮政编码方面的实用性,可用于确保及时对高风险儿童进行检测。这种方法可在全国范围内推广,以解决铅暴露问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
North Carolina Medical Journal
North Carolina Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: NCMJ, the North Carolina Medical Journal, is meant to be read by everyone with an interest in improving the health of North Carolinians. We seek to make the Journal a sounding board for new ideas, new approaches, and new policies that will deliver high quality health care, support healthy choices, and maintain a healthy environment in our state.
期刊最新文献
The Crucial Role of Academic Medical Centers in Preparing for the Future of Health AI A Compass for North Carolina Health Care Workers Navigating the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Toward an “Equitable” Assimilation of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning into Our Health Care System Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Road Ahead Applying AI to Care Management and Claims Processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1