Bibliometric analysis of focal therapy in prostate cancer research

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1002/bco2.353
Mohammed Shahait, Sarah Ibrahim, Laith Baqain, Zahi Abdul-Sater
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis of focal therapy in prostate cancer research","authors":"Mohammed Shahait,&nbsp;Sarah Ibrahim,&nbsp;Laith Baqain,&nbsp;Zahi Abdul-Sater","doi":"10.1002/bco2.353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The use of focal therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) has soared, as it controls disease and is associated with minimal side effects. Bibliometric analysis examines the global research landscape on any topic to identify gaps in the research and areas for improvement and prioritize future research efforts. This study aims to examine the research outputs and trends and collaboration landscape in the field of focal therapy for PCa on a global scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched Medline, PubMed and Scopus for peer-reviewed publications on our research topic using controlled keywords. Search results were limited to the period between 1980 and 2022, screened for duplicates and then included in our study based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The Bibliometrix Package was used for comprehensive science mapping analysis of co-authorship, co-citation and co-occurrence analysis of countries, institutions, authors, references and keywords in this field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This analysis included 2578 research articles. The annual scientific production increased from one article in 1982 to 143 in 2022 (13.21%). The average citation per year was incrementally increasing, and these documents were cited around 32.52 times. The documents included in this analysis were published in 633 sources. The international collaboration index was 22.7. In total, 6280 author keywords were identified. The most used keywords were ‘prostate cancer’, ‘focal therapy’, ‘prostate’ and ‘photodynamic therapy’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This bibliometric analysis has provided a comprehensive review of focal therapy in PCa research, highlighting both the significant growth in the field and the existing gaps that require further exploration. The study points to the need for more diverse international collaboration and exploration of various treatment modalities within the context of focal therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 6","pages":"602-609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of focal therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) has soared, as it controls disease and is associated with minimal side effects. Bibliometric analysis examines the global research landscape on any topic to identify gaps in the research and areas for improvement and prioritize future research efforts. This study aims to examine the research outputs and trends and collaboration landscape in the field of focal therapy for PCa on a global scale.

Methods

We searched Medline, PubMed and Scopus for peer-reviewed publications on our research topic using controlled keywords. Search results were limited to the period between 1980 and 2022, screened for duplicates and then included in our study based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The Bibliometrix Package was used for comprehensive science mapping analysis of co-authorship, co-citation and co-occurrence analysis of countries, institutions, authors, references and keywords in this field.

Results

This analysis included 2578 research articles. The annual scientific production increased from one article in 1982 to 143 in 2022 (13.21%). The average citation per year was incrementally increasing, and these documents were cited around 32.52 times. The documents included in this analysis were published in 633 sources. The international collaboration index was 22.7. In total, 6280 author keywords were identified. The most used keywords were ‘prostate cancer’, ‘focal therapy’, ‘prostate’ and ‘photodynamic therapy’.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis has provided a comprehensive review of focal therapy in PCa research, highlighting both the significant growth in the field and the existing gaps that require further exploration. The study points to the need for more diverse international collaboration and exploration of various treatment modalities within the context of focal therapy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌研究中焦点疗法的文献计量分析
前列腺癌(PCa)的病灶疗法能控制病情,且副作用极小,因此使用这种疗法的人数激增。文献计量学分析可对任何主题的全球研究状况进行研究,以找出研究中的差距和有待改进的领域,并确定未来研究工作的优先次序。本研究旨在考察全球范围内PCa病灶治疗领域的研究成果、趋势和合作情况。我们使用控制关键词在Medline、PubMed和Scopus上搜索了与我们的研究主题相关的同行评审出版物。搜索结果仅限于 1980 年至 2022 年期间,筛查重复内容,然后根据预先规定的资格标准将其纳入我们的研究。我们使用 Bibliometrix 软件包对该领域的国家、机构、作者、参考文献和关键词的共同作者、共同引用和共同出现进行了全面的科学图谱分析。年科研成果从 1982 年的 1 篇增加到 2022 年的 143 篇(13.21%)。每年的平均引用次数呈递增趋势,这些文献的引用次数约为 32.52 次。本分析所包含的文件发表在 633 个来源上。国际合作指数为 22.7。总共确定了 6280 个作者关键词。本文献计量学分析对 PCa 研究中的病灶疗法进行了全面回顾,强调了该领域的显著发展和需要进一步探索的现有差距。这项研究指出,在病灶疗法的背景下,有必要开展更加多样化的国际合作,并探索各种治疗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing cancer prostate following intravesical BCG for bladder cancer Understanding the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer outcomes: 12-Month follow-up data from the international, prospective COVIDSurg Cancer study Treatment preferences of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: A discrete choice experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1