Comparison of machine learning models for flood forecasting in the Mahanadi River Basin, India

Sanjay Sharma, Sangeeta Kumari
{"title":"Comparison of machine learning models for flood forecasting in the Mahanadi River Basin, India","authors":"Sanjay Sharma, Sangeeta Kumari","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2024.517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Developing accurate flood forecasting models is necessary for flood control, water resources and management in the Mahanadi River Basin. In this study, convolutional neural network (CNN) is integrated with random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR) for making a hybrid model (CNN–RF and CNN–SVR) where CNN is used as feature extraction technique while RF and SVR are used as forecasting models. These hybrid models are compared with RF, SVR, and artificial neural network (ANN). The influence of training–testing data division on the performance of hybrid models has been tested. Hyperparameter sensitivity analyses are performed for forecasting models to select the best value of hyperparameters and to exclude the nonsensitive hyperparameters. Two hydrological stations (Kantamal and Kesinga) are selected as case studies. Results indicated that CNN–RF model performs better than other models for both stations. In addition, it is found that CNN has improved the accuracy of RF and SVR models for flood forecasting. The results of the training–testing division show that both models’ performance is better at 50–50% data division. Validation results show that both models are not overfitting or underfitting. Results demonstrate that CNN–RF model can be used as a potential model for flood forecasting in river basins.","PeriodicalId":506949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","volume":"68 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing accurate flood forecasting models is necessary for flood control, water resources and management in the Mahanadi River Basin. In this study, convolutional neural network (CNN) is integrated with random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR) for making a hybrid model (CNN–RF and CNN–SVR) where CNN is used as feature extraction technique while RF and SVR are used as forecasting models. These hybrid models are compared with RF, SVR, and artificial neural network (ANN). The influence of training–testing data division on the performance of hybrid models has been tested. Hyperparameter sensitivity analyses are performed for forecasting models to select the best value of hyperparameters and to exclude the nonsensitive hyperparameters. Two hydrological stations (Kantamal and Kesinga) are selected as case studies. Results indicated that CNN–RF model performs better than other models for both stations. In addition, it is found that CNN has improved the accuracy of RF and SVR models for flood forecasting. The results of the training–testing division show that both models’ performance is better at 50–50% data division. Validation results show that both models are not overfitting or underfitting. Results demonstrate that CNN–RF model can be used as a potential model for flood forecasting in river basins.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度马哈纳迪河流域洪水预报机器学习模型比较
开发精确的洪水预报模型对马哈纳迪河流域的洪水控制、水资源和管理十分必要。在这项研究中,卷积神经网络(CNN)与随机森林(RF)和支持向量回归(SVR)相结合,建立了一个混合模型(CNN-RF 和 CNN-SVR),其中 CNN 用作特征提取技术,RF 和 SVR 用作预测模型。这些混合模型与 RF、SVR 和人工神经网络(ANN)进行了比较。测试了训练测试数据划分对混合模型性能的影响。对预测模型进行了超参数敏感性分析,以选择最佳超参数值并排除不敏感的超参数。选定两个水文站(Kantamal 和 Kesinga)作为案例研究。结果表明,在这两个水文站中,CNN-RF 模型的表现优于其他模型。此外,还发现 CNN 提高了 RF 和 SVR 模型在洪水预报方面的准确性。训练-测试划分结果表明,在 50-50% 数据划分时,两个模型的性能都更好。验证结果表明,两个模型都没有过拟合或欠拟合。结果表明,CNN-RF 模型可用作流域洪水预报的潜在模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bed shear stress distribution across a meander path Impact of El Niño, Indian Ocean dipole, and Madden–Julian oscillation on land surface temperature in Kuching City Sarawak, during the periods of 1997/1998 and 2015/2016: a pilot study Comprehensive economic losses assessment of storm surge disasters using open data: a case study of Zhoushan, China Determination of the effects of irrigation with recycled wastewater and biochar treatments on crop and soil properties in maize cultivation Determination of climate change impacts on Mediterranean streamflows: a case study of Edremit Eybek Creek, Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1