Comparison of anterior, posterior, and lateral approaches of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in an adult patient undergoing inguinal hernia surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Ajeet Kumar, C. Sinha, Soumya Singh, Amarjeet Kumar, Anil Kumar, Diti Priya
{"title":"Comparison of anterior, posterior, and lateral approaches of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in an adult patient undergoing inguinal hernia surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial","authors":"Ajeet Kumar, C. Sinha, Soumya Singh, Amarjeet Kumar, Anil Kumar, Diti Priya","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_75_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Inguinal hernia surgeries can pose significant postoperative pain, leading to chronic pain syndromes when not managed well.\n \n \n \n Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II adult patients scheduled to undergo unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries were enrolled in this trial. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups according to the various approaches of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum (QL) block: group transmuscular (TM): TM or anterior approach, group L: lateral approach, and group P: posterior approach. All the patients underwent surgery under subarachnoid blockade. A QL block was administered at the end of the surgery.\n \n \n \n A total of 19 patients in each group were analyzed. Patients in the TM group had the least 24-hour requirement of fentanyl (P < 0.001), with better pain scores (P < 0.001) and prolonged duration of analgesia. No significant difference was found in the patient satisfaction scores (PSSs) in the three approaches. None of the patients reported any adverse effects related to the block.\n \n \n \n The TM approach of QL block is an effective analgesic strategy in patients undergoing unilateral hernia surgeries. It could form a part of the multimodal analgesic regimen for such patients.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"4 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_75_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inguinal hernia surgeries can pose significant postoperative pain, leading to chronic pain syndromes when not managed well. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II adult patients scheduled to undergo unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries were enrolled in this trial. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups according to the various approaches of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum (QL) block: group transmuscular (TM): TM or anterior approach, group L: lateral approach, and group P: posterior approach. All the patients underwent surgery under subarachnoid blockade. A QL block was administered at the end of the surgery. A total of 19 patients in each group were analyzed. Patients in the TM group had the least 24-hour requirement of fentanyl (P < 0.001), with better pain scores (P < 0.001) and prolonged duration of analgesia. No significant difference was found in the patient satisfaction scores (PSSs) in the three approaches. None of the patients reported any adverse effects related to the block. The TM approach of QL block is an effective analgesic strategy in patients undergoing unilateral hernia surgeries. It could form a part of the multimodal analgesic regimen for such patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受腹股沟疝手术的成人患者进行超声引导下腰股沟区阻滞的前方、后方和侧方方法比较:前瞻性随机对照试验
腹股沟疝气手术会带来明显的术后疼痛,处理不当会导致慢性疼痛综合征。 60 名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I/II 级成人患者计划接受单侧腹股沟疝手术。根据超声引导下腰椎四头肌(QL)阻滞的不同方法,患者被随机分为三组:经肌肉(TM)组:L组:外侧入路,P组:后方入路。所有患者均在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下接受手术。手术结束时进行 QL 阻滞。 每组共有 19 名患者接受了分析。TM 组患者 24 小时芬太尼需求量最少(P < 0.001),疼痛评分更高(P < 0.001),镇痛时间更长。三种方法的患者满意度评分(PSS)无明显差异。没有患者报告与阻滞相关的任何不良反应。 在接受单侧疝气手术的患者中,QL阻滞的TM方法是一种有效的镇痛策略。它可以成为此类患者多模式镇痛方案的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in truncal surgeries: A narrative review Anesthetic challenges in using posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for phaeochromocytoma in pregnancy A case of lost endotracheal tube PONV, beyond “Apfel” score Clinical experience with stellate ganglion block in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1