The relationship of borderline personality disorder to the affective disorders.

Psychiatric developments Pub Date : 1987-01-01
J Kroll, S Ogata
{"title":"The relationship of borderline personality disorder to the affective disorders.","authors":"J Kroll,&nbsp;S Ogata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proposition that Borderline Personality Disorders (BPDs) are atypical forms of affective disorder is reviewed in the light of pharmacological, outcome and clinical studies. The case can be summarized briefly as follows: that the basic underlying cause of borderline symptomatology is an effective disorder; that mood disturbance, which is viewed as primarily biological, is more important than developmental experience and life events in maintaining borderline personality features; that therapies aimed at treating the mood disorder should therefore be expected to relieve the personality disorder. However, the pharmacological studies suggest that antidepressant medications have been largely ineffective in treating well defined BPD, except in the presence of coexisting depressive disorder. Indeed low dose antipsychotics have a demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of BPD, which does not strengthen the case for an affective etiology. Follow-up studies of BPDs suggest that dramatic characterological features seen at the time of index hospitalization tend to recede by the time patients are in their 30s, that major affective disorders fail to emerge over time, and that long-term marginal functioning derives from long-term maladaptive patterns across a variety of areas. Clinical studies suggest that 20-60 per cent of patients with BPD have a concomitant depressive disorder. Conversely the prevalence of personality disorders in depressions varies with depressive category, with considerably higher incidence of personality disturbance found in non-endogenous depression. The high rate of coexistence of these two disorders does not imply causality or primacy, in the sense that it is the affective disorder which brings out and causes the personality disorder. The review concludes that the assertion that BPD represents atypical affective disorder begs the possibility that it is precisely in having borderline features that they are atypical, and hence distinct.</p>","PeriodicalId":77773,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric developments","volume":"5 2","pages":"105-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proposition that Borderline Personality Disorders (BPDs) are atypical forms of affective disorder is reviewed in the light of pharmacological, outcome and clinical studies. The case can be summarized briefly as follows: that the basic underlying cause of borderline symptomatology is an effective disorder; that mood disturbance, which is viewed as primarily biological, is more important than developmental experience and life events in maintaining borderline personality features; that therapies aimed at treating the mood disorder should therefore be expected to relieve the personality disorder. However, the pharmacological studies suggest that antidepressant medications have been largely ineffective in treating well defined BPD, except in the presence of coexisting depressive disorder. Indeed low dose antipsychotics have a demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of BPD, which does not strengthen the case for an affective etiology. Follow-up studies of BPDs suggest that dramatic characterological features seen at the time of index hospitalization tend to recede by the time patients are in their 30s, that major affective disorders fail to emerge over time, and that long-term marginal functioning derives from long-term maladaptive patterns across a variety of areas. Clinical studies suggest that 20-60 per cent of patients with BPD have a concomitant depressive disorder. Conversely the prevalence of personality disorders in depressions varies with depressive category, with considerably higher incidence of personality disturbance found in non-endogenous depression. The high rate of coexistence of these two disorders does not imply causality or primacy, in the sense that it is the affective disorder which brings out and causes the personality disorder. The review concludes that the assertion that BPD represents atypical affective disorder begs the possibility that it is precisely in having borderline features that they are atypical, and hence distinct.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘型人格障碍与情感性障碍的关系。
从药理学、转归和临床研究三个方面综述了边缘型人格障碍是非典型情感性障碍的观点。该病例可简单概括如下:边缘性症状的根本原因是一种有效的疾病;情绪障碍主要被认为是生物性的,在维持边缘型人格特征方面,它比发展经历和生活事件更重要;因此,旨在治疗情绪障碍的疗法应该有望缓解人格障碍。然而,药理学研究表明,抗抑郁药物在治疗明确定义的BPD方面基本上无效,除非存在共存的抑郁障碍。事实上,低剂量抗精神病药物在治疗BPD方面已被证明有效,这并没有加强情感性病因的情况。对bpd的随访研究表明,患者在30多岁时住院时出现的戏剧性特征往往会消退,主要的情感障碍不会随着时间的推移而出现,长期的边缘功能源于各个领域的长期适应不良模式。临床研究表明,20- 60%的BPD患者伴有抑郁症。相反,抑郁症中人格障碍的患病率因抑郁类型而异,非内源性抑郁症中人格障碍的发生率相当高。这两种障碍的高共存率并不意味着因果关系或首要性,从某种意义上说,是情感障碍引发并导致了人格障碍。这篇综述的结论是,BPD代表非典型情感障碍的断言,提出了一种可能性,即正是在具有边缘特征的情况下,它们才是非典型的,因此是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avoidance behaviour and major depression in panic disorder: a report from the Cross-National Collaborative Panic Study. Rationale for the planned clinical trials with nerve growth factor in Alzheimer's disease. The Parental Bonding Instrument: psychometric properties reviewed. Two kinds of borderline concepts. Conceptual and empirical agreement between DSM-III, DIB, and Kernberg. Dreaming: the impact of life stress events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1