The Efficacy of Grounded Theory as a Methodology to Map the Strategic Behaviour of Small Organisations: A Reflexive Practitioner Evaluation

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS Journal of Enterprising Culture Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1142/s0218495824500031
Alex Rizzo, Ronald Aquilina, Rose Falzon
{"title":"The Efficacy of Grounded Theory as a Methodology to Map the Strategic Behaviour of Small Organisations: A Reflexive Practitioner Evaluation","authors":"Alex Rizzo, Ronald Aquilina, Rose Falzon","doi":"10.1142/s0218495824500031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This collaborative paper aims to reflexively evaluate the versatile and comprehensive application of grounded theory, comparatively using two studies researching the strategic behaviour of small organisations within a small island state. The methodological stance adopted is that of practitioner researchers, critically analysing the research positioning and processes in two large grounded theory studies that mapped the competitive behaviours of some 100 small businesses in the small island EU state of Malta. The study evaluates grounded theory processes and actions taken in the two studies, depicting the systematic collection, comparison and analysis of the data gathered, concept generation, continuous interaction between actions and context, use of in-depth interviews combined with quantitative data, coding, mapping and categorisation of the data collected, and the use of MAXQDA as a viable software tool to carry out grounded theory. This practitioner research study comprises detailed practice-related implications for the use of grounded theory in researching small organisations, in a manner that a novice grounded theory practitioner can adopt and a manager in a small business can appreciate.","PeriodicalId":45304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprising Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprising Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218495824500031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This collaborative paper aims to reflexively evaluate the versatile and comprehensive application of grounded theory, comparatively using two studies researching the strategic behaviour of small organisations within a small island state. The methodological stance adopted is that of practitioner researchers, critically analysing the research positioning and processes in two large grounded theory studies that mapped the competitive behaviours of some 100 small businesses in the small island EU state of Malta. The study evaluates grounded theory processes and actions taken in the two studies, depicting the systematic collection, comparison and analysis of the data gathered, concept generation, continuous interaction between actions and context, use of in-depth interviews combined with quantitative data, coding, mapping and categorisation of the data collected, and the use of MAXQDA as a viable software tool to carry out grounded theory. This practitioner research study comprises detailed practice-related implications for the use of grounded theory in researching small organisations, in a manner that a novice grounded theory practitioner can adopt and a manager in a small business can appreciate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以基础理论为方法绘制小型组织战略行为图的有效性:实践者的反思性评价
这篇合作论文旨在通过对小岛屿国家小型组织战略行为的两项研究进行比较,对基础理论的多功能性和全面应用进行反思性评估。本研究采用了实践研究者的方法论立场,批判性地分析了两项大型基础理论研究的研究定位和过程,这两项研究绘制了欧盟小岛国马耳他约 100 家小型企业的竞争行为图。本研究评估了这两项研究中的基础理论过程和所采取的行动,描述了系统收集、比较和分析所收集的数据、概念生成、行动与背景之间的持续互动、使用深度访谈与定量数据相结合、对所收集的数据进行编码、绘图和分类,以及使用 MAXQDA 作为可行的软件工具来实施基础理论。这项实践研究包含了在小型组织研究中使用基础理论的详细实践意义,新手基础理论实践者可以采用,小型企业的管理者也可以理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Creative Entrepreneurs: Dual Identities, Multiple Needs Towards Nonlinearity in the Entrepreneurial Process: The Entrepreneurial S-Curve Perspective The Efficacy of Grounded Theory as a Methodology to Map the Strategic Behaviour of Small Organisations: A Reflexive Practitioner Evaluation Exploring Support Practices Within Family Business Succession Process: Evidence from Tunisian SMEs Family Exploring Support Practices Within Family Business Succession Process: Evidence from Tunisian SMEs Family
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1