The Impact of Economic Integration on Income Inequality in the EU: A Panel Data Analysis of the EU Members from 2002-2020

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Integration Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.11130/jei.2024006
Quinten De Wettinck, A. Mourik
{"title":"The Impact of Economic Integration on Income Inequality in the EU: A Panel Data Analysis of the EU Members from 2002-2020","authors":"Quinten De Wettinck, A. Mourik","doi":"10.11130/jei.2024006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the relation between economic integration and income inequality for the 27 current EU members from 2002 to 2020. The Gini coefficient is the dependent variable in a panel data regression analysis, and is expressed as a function of indicators related to economic integration (total trade, intra-EU trade, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow and outflow) and a set of control variables. Although much research points to a significant relationship between inequality and integration, there is no consensus on the sign and magnitude of the effect. In this paper, four random effects panel models are estimated with robust standard errors to uncover this relationship. The results show that in the context of the EU, intra-EU trade is associated with decreased income inequality, while overall trade and FDI in- or outflow seem to have no direct effect on the income gap. In addition, the level of economic development seems to moderate the effect of intra-EU trade: for countries with a below-average gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, the reducing effect of integration on Gini is weaker than for richer countries. Additionally, market capitalisation, the presence of natural resources and government spending on social benefits are associated with reduced inequality, while unemployment and population size seem to drive income disparities. These results are consistent with a major part of the existing literature and lead to interesting conclusions for policy makers. The originality of this work differentiating it from prior research is twofold: (1) the region of examination is the EU, which is not often the subject of similar analyses, and (2) an interaction effect is examined that differs from the conventional measures for less developed economies.","PeriodicalId":45678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the relation between economic integration and income inequality for the 27 current EU members from 2002 to 2020. The Gini coefficient is the dependent variable in a panel data regression analysis, and is expressed as a function of indicators related to economic integration (total trade, intra-EU trade, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow and outflow) and a set of control variables. Although much research points to a significant relationship between inequality and integration, there is no consensus on the sign and magnitude of the effect. In this paper, four random effects panel models are estimated with robust standard errors to uncover this relationship. The results show that in the context of the EU, intra-EU trade is associated with decreased income inequality, while overall trade and FDI in- or outflow seem to have no direct effect on the income gap. In addition, the level of economic development seems to moderate the effect of intra-EU trade: for countries with a below-average gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, the reducing effect of integration on Gini is weaker than for richer countries. Additionally, market capitalisation, the presence of natural resources and government spending on social benefits are associated with reduced inequality, while unemployment and population size seem to drive income disparities. These results are consistent with a major part of the existing literature and lead to interesting conclusions for policy makers. The originality of this work differentiating it from prior research is twofold: (1) the region of examination is the EU, which is not often the subject of similar analyses, and (2) an interaction effect is examined that differs from the conventional measures for less developed economies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济一体化对欧盟收入不平等的影响:2002-2020 年欧盟成员国面板数据分析
本文研究了 2002 年至 2020 年欧盟 27 个现有成员国的经济一体化与收入不平等之间的关系。基尼系数是面板数据回归分析中的因变量,用与经济一体化相关的指标(贸易总额、欧盟内部贸易、外国直接投资(FDI)流入和流出)以及一系列控制变量的函数表示。尽管许多研究都指出不平等与一体化之间存在显著关系,但对其影响的符号和程度却没有达成共识。本文利用稳健标准误差对四个随机效应面板模型进行了估计,以揭示这种关系。结果表明,就欧盟而言,欧盟内部贸易与收入不平等的减少有关,而整体贸易和外国直接投资的流入或流出似乎对收入差距没有直接影响。此外,经济发展水平似乎会缓和欧盟内部贸易的影响:对于人均国内生产总值(GDP)低于平均水平的国家,一体化对基尼系数的降低作用要弱于富裕国家。此外,市场资本化、自然资源的存在以及政府在社会福利方面的支出都与不平等的减少有关,而失业率和人口规模似乎是收入差距的驱动因素。这些结果与现有文献的大部分内容一致,并为政策制定者提供了有趣的结论。这项工作有别于以往研究的独创性体现在两个方面:(1) 研究的地区是欧盟,类似的分析并不常见;(2) 研究的互动效应不同于针对欠发达经济体的传统衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The Empirical Study on Producer Service Industry and Economic Growth in China: Implication on Economic Integration External Debt and Economic Vulnerability: An International Evidence Examining the Impact of Environmental Pollution and Life Expectancy on Economic Growth in the European Union Trade Liberalization, International Relocation of Firms, and Economic Growth Assessing the Association Between Trade and Regional Trade Agreements: A Network Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1