Disparities in Substance Co-Use among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adult Hookah Smokers: Findings from Wave 4 (2016–2018) and Wave 5 (2018–2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study

Chandni Sakthi, Amanda Adolfo, Umme Warda, Asmaa Khaled, M. Brecht, M. Rezk-Hanna
{"title":"Disparities in Substance Co-Use among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adult Hookah Smokers: Findings from Wave 4 (2016–2018) and Wave 5 (2018–2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study","authors":"Chandni Sakthi, Amanda Adolfo, Umme Warda, Asmaa Khaled, M. Brecht, M. Rezk-Hanna","doi":"10.3390/psychoactives3010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heavily advertised as a harmless tobacco alternative, hookah (i.e., waterpipe)-flavored tobacco smoking has contributed to the wider epidemic of smoking, especially amongst marginalized sexual minority (SM) populations. Evidence regarding the concurrent use of substances and other drugs, among SM current hookah smokers, is scarce. We utilized nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (2016–2019) to examine patterns of the concurrent use of substances (i.e., marijuana, painkillers, sedatives, tranquilizers, cocaine, stimulants (specifically methamphetamines), and others), in SM adult hookah smokers and their heterosexual counterparts. Current hookah smoking is higher among SM adults (Wave 4: 4.22% [95% CI = 2.94–5.94] and Wave 5: 2.65% [95% CI = 1.81–3.48]) than heterosexuals (Wave 4: 1.31% [95% CI = 1.13–1.50] and Wave 5: 1.07% [95% CI = 0.89–1.25]). Among current SM hookah users, the co-use of substances, including alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, is comparable to heterosexuals (p = ns). Adjusting for gender alone and all covariates, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and education, no differences in concurrent substance use were observed between SM and heterosexual hookah users. While the co-use of substances is comparable between SM and heterosexual hookah smoker adults, the prevalence of current hookah use more than doubled among SM individuals than heterosexual individuals during 2018–2019. Our findings highlight the critical value of prevention efforts directed to increase education and awareness about hookah smoking use and known health effects, particularly tailored towards sexual minorities.","PeriodicalId":513469,"journal":{"name":"Psychoactives","volume":"15 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoactives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psychoactives3010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heavily advertised as a harmless tobacco alternative, hookah (i.e., waterpipe)-flavored tobacco smoking has contributed to the wider epidemic of smoking, especially amongst marginalized sexual minority (SM) populations. Evidence regarding the concurrent use of substances and other drugs, among SM current hookah smokers, is scarce. We utilized nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (2016–2019) to examine patterns of the concurrent use of substances (i.e., marijuana, painkillers, sedatives, tranquilizers, cocaine, stimulants (specifically methamphetamines), and others), in SM adult hookah smokers and their heterosexual counterparts. Current hookah smoking is higher among SM adults (Wave 4: 4.22% [95% CI = 2.94–5.94] and Wave 5: 2.65% [95% CI = 1.81–3.48]) than heterosexuals (Wave 4: 1.31% [95% CI = 1.13–1.50] and Wave 5: 1.07% [95% CI = 0.89–1.25]). Among current SM hookah users, the co-use of substances, including alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, is comparable to heterosexuals (p = ns). Adjusting for gender alone and all covariates, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and education, no differences in concurrent substance use were observed between SM and heterosexual hookah users. While the co-use of substances is comparable between SM and heterosexual hookah smoker adults, the prevalence of current hookah use more than doubled among SM individuals than heterosexual individuals during 2018–2019. Our findings highlight the critical value of prevention efforts directed to increase education and awareness about hookah smoking use and known health effects, particularly tailored towards sexual minorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性少数群体和异性恋成人胡克烟吸食者在共同使用药物方面的差异:烟草与健康人群评估研究第 4 波(2016-2018 年)和第 5 波(2018-2019 年)的结果
作为一种无害的烟草替代品,水烟(即水烟)口味的烟草烟雾被大肆宣传,助长了更广泛的吸烟流行,尤其是在边缘化的性少数群体(SM)中。目前,有关性少数群体水烟吸食者同时使用药物和其他毒品的证据还很少。我们利用烟草与健康人群评估(PATH)研究(2016-2019年)中具有全国代表性的数据,研究了性少数群体成年水烟吸食者及其异性恋吸食者同时使用药物(即大麻、止痛药、镇静剂、镇定剂、可卡因、兴奋剂(特别是甲基苯丙胺)和其他药物)的模式。目前吸食水烟的SM成人(第四波:4.22% [95% CI = 2.94-5.94],第五波:2.65% [95% CI = 1.81-3.48])高于异性恋者(第四波:1.31% [95% CI = 1.13-1.50],第五波:1.07% [95% CI = 0.89-1.25])。在目前的 SM 水烟吸食者中,同时吸食酒精、大麻和可卡因等物质的比例与异性恋者相当(P = ns)。仅对性别和所有协变量(包括年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度、收入和教育程度)进行调整后,SM 和异性恋水烟吸食者在同时使用药物方面没有发现差异。虽然SM和异性恋水烟吸食者成人之间同时使用药物的情况相当,但在2018-2019年期间,SM个体当前使用水烟的流行率比异性恋个体高出一倍多。我们的研究结果凸显了预防工作的重要价值,这些工作旨在提高关于水烟使用和已知健康影响的教育和认识,特别是针对性少数群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating Psychedelics into Groupwork: A Culturally Responsive Model for the Counseling Profession Evaluation of Density Functional Theory-Generated Data for Infrared Spectroscopy of Novel Psychoactive Substances Using Unsupervised Learning A Scoping Review of Determinants of Drinking and Driving Behavior among Young Adult College Students in the US Unlocking the Potential of Meldonium: From Performance Enhancement to Therapeutic Insights Producing Altered States of Consciousness, Reducing Substance Misuse: A Review of Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy, Transcendental Meditation and Hypnotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1