Ghalib Moseti, O. Orango, Benjamin Elly Odongo, P. Itsura, J. Odunga
{"title":"Impact of Surgical Treatment on Quality of Life of Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Case Study of Two Referral Hospitals in Kenya","authors":"Ghalib Moseti, O. Orango, Benjamin Elly Odongo, P. Itsura, J. Odunga","doi":"10.33590/emj/10306929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the impact of surgical treatment on quality of life (QoL) of patients with early-stage cervical cancer at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya, and Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Nairobi, Kenya.\n\nMethods: A cohort study conducted among 71 patients undergoing surgery for surgically amenable cervical cancer stage. Consecutive sampling of females was used to recruit participants. Participants were followed up for 3 months post-operatively. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the study participants. Bivariate analysis was used to assess the relationship between dependent and independent variables, and p value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.\n\nResults: Nearly two-thirds (63.5%) of the females had a parity of four or more, 69 (97.2%) did not have a family history of cervical cancer, and 57 (80.3%) were negative on HIV test. Most females (47.9%) had Stage IB2 cervical cancer, followed by those with Stage IB1, seen in 28 (39.4%) of the females enrolled. There were statistically significant differences in pain/discomfort (p=0.028) and anxiety/depression (p=0.028). Patients aged 20–35 years had a two-fold increased likelihood (adjusted odds ratio: 2.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.30–3.10; p=0.011) of reporting better QoL scores compared to older females. The lower the cervical cancer stage (Stage IA2), the higher the likelihood for improved QoL following surgical management of cervical cancer (adjusted odds ratio: 5.69; 95% confidence interval: 3.55–6.89; p=0.001).\n\nConclusion: This study reports that being aged 20–35 years old and having a lower stage cervical cancer increased the likelihood of a good QoL outcome following surgical management of cervical cancer.","PeriodicalId":505023,"journal":{"name":"European Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emj/10306929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the impact of surgical treatment on quality of life (QoL) of patients with early-stage cervical cancer at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya, and Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Nairobi, Kenya.
Methods: A cohort study conducted among 71 patients undergoing surgery for surgically amenable cervical cancer stage. Consecutive sampling of females was used to recruit participants. Participants were followed up for 3 months post-operatively. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the study participants. Bivariate analysis was used to assess the relationship between dependent and independent variables, and p value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: Nearly two-thirds (63.5%) of the females had a parity of four or more, 69 (97.2%) did not have a family history of cervical cancer, and 57 (80.3%) were negative on HIV test. Most females (47.9%) had Stage IB2 cervical cancer, followed by those with Stage IB1, seen in 28 (39.4%) of the females enrolled. There were statistically significant differences in pain/discomfort (p=0.028) and anxiety/depression (p=0.028). Patients aged 20–35 years had a two-fold increased likelihood (adjusted odds ratio: 2.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.30–3.10; p=0.011) of reporting better QoL scores compared to older females. The lower the cervical cancer stage (Stage IA2), the higher the likelihood for improved QoL following surgical management of cervical cancer (adjusted odds ratio: 5.69; 95% confidence interval: 3.55–6.89; p=0.001).
Conclusion: This study reports that being aged 20–35 years old and having a lower stage cervical cancer increased the likelihood of a good QoL outcome following surgical management of cervical cancer.