Impact of Surgical Treatment on Quality of Life of Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Case Study of Two Referral Hospitals in Kenya

Ghalib Moseti, O. Orango, Benjamin Elly Odongo, P. Itsura, J. Odunga
{"title":"Impact of Surgical Treatment on Quality of Life of Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Case Study of Two Referral Hospitals in Kenya","authors":"Ghalib Moseti, O. Orango, Benjamin Elly Odongo, P. Itsura, J. Odunga","doi":"10.33590/emj/10306929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the impact of surgical treatment on quality of life (QoL) of patients with early-stage cervical cancer at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya, and Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Nairobi, Kenya.\n\nMethods: A cohort study conducted among 71 patients undergoing surgery for surgically amenable cervical cancer stage. Consecutive sampling of females was used to recruit participants. Participants were followed up for 3 months post-operatively. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the study participants. Bivariate analysis was used to assess the relationship between dependent and independent variables, and p value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.\n\nResults: Nearly two-thirds (63.5%) of the females had a parity of four or more, 69 (97.2%) did not have a family history of cervical cancer, and 57 (80.3%) were negative on HIV test. Most females (47.9%) had Stage IB2 cervical cancer, followed by those with Stage IB1, seen in 28 (39.4%) of the females enrolled. There were statistically significant differences in pain/discomfort (p=0.028) and anxiety/depression (p=0.028). Patients aged 20–35 years had a two-fold increased likelihood (adjusted odds ratio: 2.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.30–3.10; p=0.011) of reporting better QoL scores compared to older females. The lower the cervical cancer stage (Stage IA2), the higher the likelihood for improved QoL following surgical management of cervical cancer (adjusted odds ratio: 5.69; 95% confidence interval: 3.55–6.89; p=0.001).\n\nConclusion: This study reports that being aged 20–35 years old and having a lower stage cervical cancer increased the likelihood of a good QoL outcome following surgical management of cervical cancer.","PeriodicalId":505023,"journal":{"name":"European Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emj/10306929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of surgical treatment on quality of life (QoL) of patients with early-stage cervical cancer at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya, and Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Nairobi, Kenya. Methods: A cohort study conducted among 71 patients undergoing surgery for surgically amenable cervical cancer stage. Consecutive sampling of females was used to recruit participants. Participants were followed up for 3 months post-operatively. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the study participants. Bivariate analysis was used to assess the relationship between dependent and independent variables, and p value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Nearly two-thirds (63.5%) of the females had a parity of four or more, 69 (97.2%) did not have a family history of cervical cancer, and 57 (80.3%) were negative on HIV test. Most females (47.9%) had Stage IB2 cervical cancer, followed by those with Stage IB1, seen in 28 (39.4%) of the females enrolled. There were statistically significant differences in pain/discomfort (p=0.028) and anxiety/depression (p=0.028). Patients aged 20–35 years had a two-fold increased likelihood (adjusted odds ratio: 2.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.30–3.10; p=0.011) of reporting better QoL scores compared to older females. The lower the cervical cancer stage (Stage IA2), the higher the likelihood for improved QoL following surgical management of cervical cancer (adjusted odds ratio: 5.69; 95% confidence interval: 3.55–6.89; p=0.001). Conclusion: This study reports that being aged 20–35 years old and having a lower stage cervical cancer increased the likelihood of a good QoL outcome following surgical management of cervical cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术治疗对早期宫颈癌患者生活质量的影响:肯尼亚两家转诊医院的案例研究
目的确定在肯尼亚埃尔多雷特的莫伊教学和转诊医院(MTRH)以及肯尼亚内罗毕的肯雅塔国立医院(KNH)接受手术治疗对早期宫颈癌患者生活质量(QoL)的影响:方法:对 71 名接受手术治疗的宫颈癌分期患者进行队列研究。研究采用女性连续抽样的方式招募参与者。对参与者进行了术后 3 个月的随访。研究采用描述性统计来描述参与者。采用双变量分析评估因变量和自变量之间的关系,P值≤0.05为具有统计学意义:近三分之二的女性(63.5%)的胎次为四次或四次以上,69 名女性(97.2%)无宫颈癌家族史,57 名女性(80.3%)HIV 检测呈阴性。大多数女性(47.9%)患有 IB2 期宫颈癌,其次是 IB1 期,有 28 名女性(39.4%)患有 IB1 期宫颈癌。在疼痛/不适(P=0.028)和焦虑/抑郁(P=0.028)方面,差异有统计学意义。与年龄较大的女性相比,20-35 岁的患者报告 QoL 评分较高的可能性增加了两倍(调整后的几率比:2.44;95% 置信区间:1.30-3.10;p=0.011)。宫颈癌分期越低(IA2 期),宫颈癌手术治疗后 QoL 改善的可能性越大(调整后的几率比:5.69;95% 置信区间:3.55-6.89;P=0.001):本研究报告显示,年龄在 20-35 岁之间、宫颈癌分期较低的患者在接受宫颈癌手术治疗后获得良好 QoL 结果的可能性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editor’s Pick: Genetics and Pathophysiology of Co-occurrence of Congenital Heart Disease and Autism Spectrum Disorder Frequency Determination of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection at a Renal Care Centre Review of the 12th Edition of the European Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Products (ECRD) 2024 How Can We Bridge the Rare Disease Treatment Gap? Role of Nebulisers in the Treatment of Patients with Severe and Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1