Disability studies in war and care: How to do work otherwise? A conversation between anthropology-and-disability-studies scholars in relation to Russia's invasion of Ukraine

Hanna Zaremba-Kosovych, Volha Verbilovich, Sarah D. Phillips, Julie Hemment
{"title":"Disability studies in war and care: How to do work otherwise? A conversation between anthropology-and-disability-studies scholars in relation to Russia's invasion of Ukraine","authors":"Hanna Zaremba-Kosovych,&nbsp;Volha Verbilovich,&nbsp;Sarah D. Phillips,&nbsp;Julie Hemment","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This piece weaves together the voices of four feminist disability studies scholars and anthropologists whose work has been profoundly shaped by Russia's war of aggression. Composed via a dialogic encounter, it is based on a panel presentation on the topic of disability studies in war and care that took place at the University of Massachusetts Amherst just before the 1-year mark of the full-scale invasion. We came together to share insights and consider the best ways to practice horizontal solidarity, our approach inspired by recent work on feminist epistemology and methodology and scholarship on care, and disability studies. The text assumes a dialogic form, presenting our reflections as well as the contexts that shape our knowledge production and sharing the process of scaffolding our “Dis-Fem” conversation. In dialogue with the decolonizing discussions that animate feminist, anthropological, and Slavic Studies, as well as critical disability scholarship, it centers on the work of Ukrainian scholar-activists associated with the organization of people with disabilities (OPD) Fight For Right. In foregrounding their work, it traces the creative ways they've mobilized data and the experimental and collaborative data practices they've harnessed. Finally, it asks questions about trans-local solidarities we can enact and ways we might forge novel, “otherwise” ways to collaborate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This piece weaves together the voices of four feminist disability studies scholars and anthropologists whose work has been profoundly shaped by Russia's war of aggression. Composed via a dialogic encounter, it is based on a panel presentation on the topic of disability studies in war and care that took place at the University of Massachusetts Amherst just before the 1-year mark of the full-scale invasion. We came together to share insights and consider the best ways to practice horizontal solidarity, our approach inspired by recent work on feminist epistemology and methodology and scholarship on care, and disability studies. The text assumes a dialogic form, presenting our reflections as well as the contexts that shape our knowledge production and sharing the process of scaffolding our “Dis-Fem” conversation. In dialogue with the decolonizing discussions that animate feminist, anthropological, and Slavic Studies, as well as critical disability scholarship, it centers on the work of Ukrainian scholar-activists associated with the organization of people with disabilities (OPD) Fight For Right. In foregrounding their work, it traces the creative ways they've mobilized data and the experimental and collaborative data practices they've harnessed. Finally, it asks questions about trans-local solidarities we can enact and ways we might forge novel, “otherwise” ways to collaborate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战争和护理中的残疾研究:如何开展其他工作?人类学与残疾研究学者就俄罗斯入侵乌克兰问题进行的对话
这篇文章汇集了四位女权主义残疾研究学者和人类学家的心声,俄罗斯的侵略战争对她们的工作产生了深远的影响。这篇文章是通过一次对话式的接触而创作的,它基于马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校就战争与关爱中的残疾研究这一主题所做的小组发言。我们聚集在一起,分享见解,思考实践横向团结的最佳方式,我们的方法受到了女权主义认识论和方法论以及护理和残疾研究方面最新研究成果的启发。本文采用对话形式,介绍了我们的思考以及影响我们知识生产的背景,并分享了我们的 "残疾-女性 "对话过程。在与激发女权主义、人类学、斯拉夫研究以及批判性残疾学术研究的非殖民化讨论进行对话的过程中,该书以与残疾人组织(OPD)"为权利而战"(Fight For Right)相关的乌克兰学者-活动家的工作为中心。在突出他们工作的同时,该书追溯了他们调动数据的创造性方式,以及他们利用数据的实验性和协作性实践。最后,它提出了一些问题,如我们可以建立跨地方的团结,以及我们可以建立新颖的、"其他 "的合作方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Finding Wang Tonghui: The life and after‐life of a pioneer female Chinese anthropologist Gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium commentary The politics of emotion and domestic violence in northern Vietnam Introduction to the gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1