Thoracic radiotherapy timing and prognostic factors in elderly patients with limited‐stage small cell lung cancer

Q4 Medicine Precision Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1002/pro6.1223
Huan Zhao, Yue Qi, Lanfang Zhang, Meng Xing, Fujun Yang
{"title":"Thoracic radiotherapy timing and prognostic factors in elderly patients with limited‐stage small cell lung cancer","authors":"Huan Zhao, Yue Qi, Lanfang Zhang, Meng Xing, Fujun Yang","doi":"10.1002/pro6.1223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the outcomes of elderly patients with limited‐stage small cell lung cancer (LS‐SCLC), which may be linked to the timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) following chemotherapy.Elderly patients (n = 78) with LS‐SCLC were divided into three groups depending on the timing of radiotherapy. The patients in the TRT group were stratified into early (TRT after 1–2 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 29), medium‐term (TRT after 3–4 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 33), and late (TRT after 5–6 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 16) TRT groups. The overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were assessed and compared.The medium‐term TRT group demonstrated significantly longer mPFS (20.12 months) and better mOS (35.97 months) than those in the other groups (PFS: P = 0.021;OS: P = 0.035). A pairwise comparison of the three groups revealed that those who received medium‐term TRT exhibited significantly improved PFS than the early (mPFS: 20.12 vs. 10.36 mouths, P = 0.018) and late (mPFS: 20.12 vs. 9.17 months, P = 0.016) TRT. The medium‐term TRT group demonstrated significantly improved OS than the early TRT (mOS: 35.97 vs. 25.22 months, P = 0.007) but not in comparison with the late TRT (mOS: 35.97 vs. 21.63 months, P = 0.100).In elderly patients with LS‐SCLC, the addition of TRT after 3–4 cycles of chemotherapy appears to be a viable and potentially beneficial treatment approach.","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the outcomes of elderly patients with limited‐stage small cell lung cancer (LS‐SCLC), which may be linked to the timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) following chemotherapy.Elderly patients (n = 78) with LS‐SCLC were divided into three groups depending on the timing of radiotherapy. The patients in the TRT group were stratified into early (TRT after 1–2 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 29), medium‐term (TRT after 3–4 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 33), and late (TRT after 5–6 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 16) TRT groups. The overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were assessed and compared.The medium‐term TRT group demonstrated significantly longer mPFS (20.12 months) and better mOS (35.97 months) than those in the other groups (PFS: P = 0.021;OS: P = 0.035). A pairwise comparison of the three groups revealed that those who received medium‐term TRT exhibited significantly improved PFS than the early (mPFS: 20.12 vs. 10.36 mouths, P = 0.018) and late (mPFS: 20.12 vs. 9.17 months, P = 0.016) TRT. The medium‐term TRT group demonstrated significantly improved OS than the early TRT (mOS: 35.97 vs. 25.22 months, P = 0.007) but not in comparison with the late TRT (mOS: 35.97 vs. 21.63 months, P = 0.100).In elderly patients with LS‐SCLC, the addition of TRT after 3–4 cycles of chemotherapy appears to be a viable and potentially beneficial treatment approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年局限期小细胞肺癌患者的胸腔放疗时机和预后因素
本研究评估了局限期小细胞肺癌(LS-SCLC)老年患者的预后,这可能与化疗后胸腔放疗(TRT)的时机有关。根据放疗时机的不同,LS-SCLC老年患者(78人)被分为三组。TRT组患者被分为早期(化疗1-2个周期后TRT,29人)、中期(化疗3-4个周期后TRT,33人)和晚期(化疗5-6个周期后TRT,16人)TRT组。中期 TRT 组的 mPFS(20.12 个月)和 mOS(35.97 个月)明显长于其他组(PFS:P = 0.021;OS:P = 0.035)。对三组患者进行配对比较后发现,与早期(mPFS:20.12 个月 vs. 10.36 个月,P = 0.018)和晚期(mPFS:20.12 个月 vs. 9.17 个月,P = 0.016)TRT 相比,接受中期 TRT 的患者的 PFS 有明显改善。中期TRT组的OS明显优于早期TRT组(mOS:35.97个月 vs. 25.22个月,P = 0.007),但不优于晚期TRT组(mOS:35.97个月 vs. 21.63个月,P = 0.100)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Radiation Oncology
Precision Radiation Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Sinonasal Teratocarcinosarcoma: A case report Stereotactic body radiotherapy takes on Lung Oligometastases: Latest breakthroughs Clinical outcomes of multisite moderate to high dose radiotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma Stereotactic radiotherapy: An educational narrative review Clinical application of high‐LET radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in malignant tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1