Medical students’ experiences and perspectives on simulation-based education

N. Ensor, Mithila Sivasubramaniam, Ashleigh Laird, B. Roddis, K. Qin, Maurizio Pacilli, Debra Nestel, R. Nataraja
{"title":"Medical students’ experiences and perspectives on simulation-based education","authors":"N. Ensor, Mithila Sivasubramaniam, Ashleigh Laird, B. Roddis, K. Qin, Maurizio Pacilli, Debra Nestel, R. Nataraja","doi":"10.54531/uswj3969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to gain insight into student experiences of simulation-based education (SBE), particularly in regards to (1) current provision of SBE, (2) learning opportunities and (3) areas for improvements, innovation and focused initiatives. This was to create focussed initiatives that can assess and address specific needs to improve SBE for learners and educators alike.\n Medical students were surveyed with 41 questions on their experiences of SBE using an 11-point Likert scale (0 – strongly disagree, 10 – strongly agree). Results were analysed by individual questions and presented as median (interquartile range) or percentage (\n 246 students participated, with 76.0% (187/246) completing all questions. 99.2% of students (235/237) had participated in SBE. The most valuable elements of SBE were learning a new skill under supervision (90.3%, 187/207), applying prior knowledge to a clinical scenario (73.4%, 152/187) and identifying gaps in knowledge/skill (73.4%, 152/187). Simulation was thought to improve medical knowledge (95.2%, 218/229) and technical skills (87.3%, 200/229). Twenty-one per cent (41/197) of students reported a negative experience and 23.5% (48/204) felt anxious. Students strongly agreed that simulation was beneficial to their training (9 [8–10]) and that there should be more SBE (8.5 [8–10]).\n Medical students find SBE accessible and valuable to their education. By analysing student perspectives (such as self-reported negative experience), targeted areas for further research and focussed initiatives can be implemented.","PeriodicalId":506634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/uswj3969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to gain insight into student experiences of simulation-based education (SBE), particularly in regards to (1) current provision of SBE, (2) learning opportunities and (3) areas for improvements, innovation and focused initiatives. This was to create focussed initiatives that can assess and address specific needs to improve SBE for learners and educators alike. Medical students were surveyed with 41 questions on their experiences of SBE using an 11-point Likert scale (0 – strongly disagree, 10 – strongly agree). Results were analysed by individual questions and presented as median (interquartile range) or percentage ( 246 students participated, with 76.0% (187/246) completing all questions. 99.2% of students (235/237) had participated in SBE. The most valuable elements of SBE were learning a new skill under supervision (90.3%, 187/207), applying prior knowledge to a clinical scenario (73.4%, 152/187) and identifying gaps in knowledge/skill (73.4%, 152/187). Simulation was thought to improve medical knowledge (95.2%, 218/229) and technical skills (87.3%, 200/229). Twenty-one per cent (41/197) of students reported a negative experience and 23.5% (48/204) felt anxious. Students strongly agreed that simulation was beneficial to their training (9 [8–10]) and that there should be more SBE (8.5 [8–10]). Medical students find SBE accessible and valuable to their education. By analysing student perspectives (such as self-reported negative experience), targeted areas for further research and focussed initiatives can be implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生对模拟教学的体验和看法
我们的目标是深入了解学生对模拟教育(SBE)的体验,特别是关于(1)目前提供的模拟教育,(2)学习机会和(3)需要改进、创新和重点举措的领域。这样做的目的是制定有针对性的计划,以评估和解决具体需求,从而改善学习者和教育者的模拟基础教育。采用 11 点李克特量表(0 - 非常不同意,10 - 非常同意)对医学生进行了 41 个问题的调查,以了解他们对校本教育的体验。调查结果按单个问题进行分析,并以中位数(四分位间距)或百分比表示(246 名学生参与了调查,其中 76.0%(187/246)的学生完成了所有问题。99.2%的学生(235/237)参加过校本教育。SBE最有价值的内容是在指导下学习一项新技能(90.3%,187/207)、将已有知识应用于临床情景(73.4%,152/187)以及找出知识/技能差距(73.4%,152/187)。模拟被认为能提高医学知识(95.2%,218/229)和技术技能(87.3%,200/229)。21%的学生(41/197)报告了负面体验,23.5%的学生(48/204)感到焦虑。学生们非常同意模拟训练对他们的培训有益(9 [8-10]),并认为应该有更多的 SBE(8.5 [8-10])。医学生认为模拟医疗对他们的教育既方便又有价值。通过分析学生的观点(如自我报告的负面经历),可以有针对性地开展进一步研究并采取有针对性的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mixed reality simulation training in the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study Virtual reality versus webinar trans healthcare training for emergency medicine residents: a feasibility study Using Forum Theatre techniques in teaching and learning about professionalism and communication in healthcare Revising the ASPiH standards: reflections on the evolution of simulated practice Stress and resilience among military medical students completing a high-fidelity military medical simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1