Predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.34172/jcvtr.32913
Mohammad Reza Dehghani, Navideh Safarzadeh, Akram Shariati, Yousef Rezaei
{"title":"Predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion","authors":"Mohammad Reza Dehghani, Navideh Safarzadeh, Akram Shariati, Yousef Rezaei","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.32913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) is routinely implemented in daily practice; however, it can be associated with the development of recurrent AF. In this study we aimed to evaluate the predictors of AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion, and to compare the outcomes of patients with or without AF recurrence during follow-up. Methods: Patients with persistent AF were enrolled from March 2015 to September 2018. Patients with recurrent AF within 6 months after the index cardioversion were considered as AF recurrence (AFR) group, and those with normal sinus rhythm were defined as normal sinus rhythm (NSR) group. Thereafter, all patients were followed up for the incidence of adverse events, including death, requiring dialysis, coronary artery intervention/surgeries, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, and recurrent AF beyond 6 months. Results: Of 129 patients, 11 patients had failed cardioversion and 7 patients lost to follow-up. So, 34 and 77 patients were categorized as the NSR and the AFR groups. During a median follow-up time of 54 (46-75) months, there was a trend for a higher incidence of major adverse events in the AFR group compared to the NSR group (P=0.063). Lower body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 0.885, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.794-0.986, P=0.027) and coarse AF before the index cardioversion (OR 3.846, 95% CI 1.189-12.443, P=0.025) were the independent predictors of recurrent AF. Conclusion: In patients with persistent AF undergoing cardioversion, the presence of coarse AF and the lower values of body mass index were found to be associated with the AF recurrence.","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.32913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) is routinely implemented in daily practice; however, it can be associated with the development of recurrent AF. In this study we aimed to evaluate the predictors of AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion, and to compare the outcomes of patients with or without AF recurrence during follow-up. Methods: Patients with persistent AF were enrolled from March 2015 to September 2018. Patients with recurrent AF within 6 months after the index cardioversion were considered as AF recurrence (AFR) group, and those with normal sinus rhythm were defined as normal sinus rhythm (NSR) group. Thereafter, all patients were followed up for the incidence of adverse events, including death, requiring dialysis, coronary artery intervention/surgeries, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, and recurrent AF beyond 6 months. Results: Of 129 patients, 11 patients had failed cardioversion and 7 patients lost to follow-up. So, 34 and 77 patients were categorized as the NSR and the AFR groups. During a median follow-up time of 54 (46-75) months, there was a trend for a higher incidence of major adverse events in the AFR group compared to the NSR group (P=0.063). Lower body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 0.885, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.794-0.986, P=0.027) and coarse AF before the index cardioversion (OR 3.846, 95% CI 1.189-12.443, P=0.025) were the independent predictors of recurrent AF. Conclusion: In patients with persistent AF undergoing cardioversion, the presence of coarse AF and the lower values of body mass index were found to be associated with the AF recurrence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受心脏电复律治疗的持续性心房颤动患者长期预后的预测因素
导言:心房颤动(房颤)的心脏电复律是日常治疗的常规方法,但也可能导致房颤复发。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估电复律术后房颤复发的预测因素,并比较房颤复发或未复发患者的随访结果。研究方法2015年3月至2018年9月期间,持续性房颤患者入组。指标心脏电复律后 6 个月内房颤复发的患者被视为房颤复发(AFR)组,窦性心律正常的患者被定义为窦性心律正常(NSR)组。此后,对所有患者进行随访,以了解不良事件的发生率,包括死亡、需要透析、冠状动脉介入治疗/手术、脑血管事件、心力衰竭和 6 个月后房颤复发。结果:在129名患者中,11名患者心脏复律失败,7名患者失去随访。因此,34 名患者和 77 名患者被分为 NSR 组和 AFR 组。中位随访时间为 54(46-75)个月,与 NSR 组相比,AFR 组主要不良事件的发生率呈上升趋势(P=0.063)。较低的体重指数(比值比 [OR] 0.885,95% 置信区间 [CI]0.794-0.986,P=0.027)和指数心脏复律前的粗房颤(OR 3.846,95% CI 1.189-12.443,P=0.025)是复发性房颤的独立预测因素。结论在接受心脏复律术的持续性房颤患者中,粗房颤的存在和较低的体重指数值与房颤复发有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acellular carotid scaffold and evaluation the biological and biomechanical properties for tissue engineering Vietnamese version of the Hypertension Knowledge-Level Scale (HK-LS): Translation and validation Right pulmonary artery compression following acute type A aortic dissection resulting in acute right ventricular heart failure: A case report Low-dose, high-pitch, spiral (FLASH) mode versus conventional sequential method for coronary artery calcium scoring: A derivation-validation study Risk factors for re-expansion pulmonary edema following chest tube drainage in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1