Working From Home in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.53761/vn71sq54
Ishaq Al-Naabi, Nahid Al-Shukaili
{"title":"Working From Home in Higher Education: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ishaq Al-Naabi, Nahid Al-Shukaili","doi":"10.53761/vn71sq54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expectations of teaching staff employed in higher education institutions worldwide transformed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid shift to online curriculum delivery, with teachers working from their homes, resulted in significant changes to employer-employee workplace relations and management systems (some temporary; others permanent). Following the Job Demands-Resources Model as a theoretical framework, this study adopts a systematic literature review research methodology using the PRISMA approach and a deductive thematic analysis to analyse and synthesise the literature on working from home in higher education published during the pandemic (2020+). The findings indicated a convergence between the identified challenges and increased job demands such as workload and role ambiguity, along with a dearth of job resources encompassing infrastructure, training, and support. In addition to establishing support policies and providing training opportunities, the study raised the need for reassessment and modification of work policies in higher education to support work-from-home settings navigating the post-pandemic era.","PeriodicalId":45764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53761/vn71sq54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expectations of teaching staff employed in higher education institutions worldwide transformed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid shift to online curriculum delivery, with teachers working from their homes, resulted in significant changes to employer-employee workplace relations and management systems (some temporary; others permanent). Following the Job Demands-Resources Model as a theoretical framework, this study adopts a systematic literature review research methodology using the PRISMA approach and a deductive thematic analysis to analyse and synthesise the literature on working from home in higher education published during the pandemic (2020+). The findings indicated a convergence between the identified challenges and increased job demands such as workload and role ambiguity, along with a dearth of job resources encompassing infrastructure, training, and support. In addition to establishing support policies and providing training opportunities, the study raised the need for reassessment and modification of work policies in higher education to support work-from-home settings navigating the post-pandemic era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中的在家工作:系统回顾
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,世界各地高等教育机构聘用的教职员工的期望发生了变 化。由于迅速转向在线课程授课,教师在家工作,雇主与雇员之间的工作场所关系和管理制度发生了重大变化(有些是临时性的,有些则是永久性的)。本研究以 "工作需求-资源模型 "为理论框架,采用 "PRISMA "系统文献综述研究方法和演绎式主题分析法,分析和归纳了大流行病(2020+)期间发表的有关高等教育在家办公的文献。研究结果表明,已确定的挑战与工作需求的增加(如工作量和角色模糊性)以及包括基础设施、培训和支持在内的工作资源的匮乏是一致的。除了制定支持政策和提供培训机会外,该研究还提出了重新评估和修改高等教育工作政策的必要性,以支持在家工作环境在后流行病时代的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice aims to add significantly to the body of knowledge describing effective and innovative teaching and learning practice in higher education.The Journal is a forum for educational practitioners across a wide range of disciplines. Its purpose is to facilitate the communication of teaching and learning outcomes in a scholarly way, bridging the gap between journals covering purely academic research and articles and opinions published without peer review.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Intensive modes of teaching, past, present, and future Editorial: More Practical Gender Research is Needed in Higher Education Leadership and Management What Exactly is Peer Learning? An Exploratory Analysis of Student Class Interaction Reframing Professional Identity: Professional Development Framework for Learning/Educational Designers Perceptions and Experiences of Academic Advisers and Minoritised Students at a UK University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1