Examining the Proteus Effect in the context of healthy food choices and intentions to eat healthy: the role of Avatar Body Size, Avatar Allocation Type and Visual Perspective

Nadine E van der Waal, Loes Janssen, M. Antheunis, L. N. van der Laan
{"title":"Examining the Proteus Effect in the context of healthy food choices and intentions to eat healthy: the role of Avatar Body Size, Avatar Allocation Type and Visual Perspective","authors":"Nadine E van der Waal, Loes Janssen, M. Antheunis, L. N. van der Laan","doi":"10.1162/pres_a_00410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As avatars gain prominence in health-promoting applications, understanding how health-related avatar appearance characteristics could affect users' behavior is crucial. Drawing upon the Proteus effect, avatars can positively and negatively affect health behaviors, depending on whether the avatar appearance is aligned with stereotypes about healthy or unhealthy behavior. Investigating avatar appearances is essential to understand potential negative health effects. Three experiments in a non-immersive virtual supermarket examined whether controlling an overweight avatar negatively affected 1) intentions to eat healthy and 2) food choice healthiness in the virtual supermarket, thereby investigating avatar allocation type (Study 1) and visual perspective (Study 2) as moderators. 2 (Avatar body size: overweight vs. healthy weight) by 2 (Avatar allocation type: self-assigned vs. experimenter-assigned [Study 1]; Visual perspective: first-person vs. third-person [Studies 2 and 3]) between-subjects designs were employed. None of the studies demonstrated the Proteus effect and no moderating role of avatar allocation type was found (Study 1). Unexpectedly, controlling an overweight avatar resulted in stronger intentions to eat healthy from a third-person perspective only (Study 2), which led to the hypothesis that the overweight avatar functioned as a fear stimulus. To test this, a health message was added that highlighted obesity as a health risk (Study 3). The addition of this message did not affect intentions to eat healthy and food choice healthiness. The combination of fear appeal and self-perception theory as explanatory frameworks for behavioral responses to avatars opens avenues for new research, such as exploring specific conditions that trigger each effect.","PeriodicalId":501553,"journal":{"name":"PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As avatars gain prominence in health-promoting applications, understanding how health-related avatar appearance characteristics could affect users' behavior is crucial. Drawing upon the Proteus effect, avatars can positively and negatively affect health behaviors, depending on whether the avatar appearance is aligned with stereotypes about healthy or unhealthy behavior. Investigating avatar appearances is essential to understand potential negative health effects. Three experiments in a non-immersive virtual supermarket examined whether controlling an overweight avatar negatively affected 1) intentions to eat healthy and 2) food choice healthiness in the virtual supermarket, thereby investigating avatar allocation type (Study 1) and visual perspective (Study 2) as moderators. 2 (Avatar body size: overweight vs. healthy weight) by 2 (Avatar allocation type: self-assigned vs. experimenter-assigned [Study 1]; Visual perspective: first-person vs. third-person [Studies 2 and 3]) between-subjects designs were employed. None of the studies demonstrated the Proteus effect and no moderating role of avatar allocation type was found (Study 1). Unexpectedly, controlling an overweight avatar resulted in stronger intentions to eat healthy from a third-person perspective only (Study 2), which led to the hypothesis that the overweight avatar functioned as a fear stimulus. To test this, a health message was added that highlighted obesity as a health risk (Study 3). The addition of this message did not affect intentions to eat healthy and food choice healthiness. The combination of fear appeal and self-perception theory as explanatory frameworks for behavioral responses to avatars opens avenues for new research, such as exploring specific conditions that trigger each effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在健康食品选择和健康饮食意愿的背景下研究普洛特斯效应:阿凡达体型、阿凡达分配类型和视觉视角的作用
随着头像在促进健康的应用中日益突出,了解与健康相关的头像外观特征如何影响用户的行为至关重要。借鉴普洛特斯效应,头像可以对健康行为产生积极或消极影响,这取决于头像外观是否符合人们对健康或不健康行为的刻板印象。调查化身的外观对于了解潜在的负面健康影响至关重要。在一个非沉浸式虚拟超市中进行的三项实验研究了控制一个超重的头像是否会对以下两方面产生负面影响:1)健康饮食的意愿;2)在虚拟超市中选择食物的健康程度,从而研究了头像分配类型(研究 1)和视觉角度(研究 2)作为调节因素的作用。研究采用了 2(头像体型:超重 vs. 健康体重)乘 2(头像分配类型:自我分配 vs. 实验者分配 [研究 1];视觉视角:第一人称 vs. 第三人称 [研究 2 和 3])的被试间设计。没有一项研究显示了普洛特斯效应,也没有发现化身分配类型的调节作用(研究 1)。出乎意料的是,控制一个超重的头像只会从第三人称的角度导致更强的健康饮食意向(研究 2),这导致了一个假设,即超重的头像起到了恐惧刺激的作用。为了验证这一点,我们添加了一条健康信息,强调肥胖是一种健康风险(研究 3)。添加这一信息并不影响健康饮食的意愿和食物选择的健康程度。将恐惧吸引力和自我认知理论结合起来,作为头像行为反应的解释框架,为新的研究开辟了道路,例如探索触发每种效应的具体条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Center for Cyber-Physical Systems: Immersive Visualization and Simulation Environment First-Person Experience in Virtual Reality Sport Advertisement: Transportation of Embodied Empathy Assessment and Application of Digital Museum Visitors' Emotional Experience Based on Virtual Reality Technology and Emotion Recognition Algorithm Contribution of Virtual Reality to the Reproduction of Social Interaction characteristics in Neuropsychology: A Systematic Review of the Literature Bridging the Headset: Engagement, Collaboration and Learning In and Around Virtual Reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1